Re: How do I debug if the queries are not getting resolved?

Am 11.12.2023 um 23:37:36 Uhr schrieb Blason R: > I require assistance in troubleshooting the resolution issue for > specific domains that are not being resolved properly. The version of > BIND I am currently using is BIND 9.18.20-1. First, tell us if those queries are authoritative on that serve

Re: unable-resolve-bank=domain

Am 17.12.2023 um 10:21:05 Uhr schrieb MEjaz via bind-users: > One of the banking domain www.services.online-banking.gslb.sabbnet.com > unable to > resolve with our primary namservers 212.119.64.2 whearas as my > another server 212.119.64.3 is

Re: [Windows] [9.16.45] Missing IPv4 DNS prevents tools from working

Am 09.01.2024 um 01:41:46 Uhr schrieb Gentry Deng via bind-users: > Due to an accident my local network is missing IPv4 DNS but has IPv6 > DNS so it has little impact on accessing the internet. > > But I found that neither `dig `nor `nslookup` worked, and reported an > error: Windows Linux subsy

Re: BIND Upgrade

Am 15.02.2024 schrieb Semra Türkkal Nazlımoğlu : > Our bind version seems below. How can we upgrade bind version? It comes from the OS you are using. Upgrade to the current RHEL release. If you prefer bleeding-edge versions, use Fedora instead. > And if we upgrade bind version, is there any prob

Re: record PTR

Am 14.03.2024 schrieb sami.ra...@sofrecom.com: > Hello, please, I want to know if I need to delegate a range of IP > addresses to my authoritative DNS server with my registrar before > creating a PTR record or not. In other words, if I want to create a > PTR record on my authoritative server (ns1.

Re: DoH credentials

Am 25.03.2024 um 17:09:43 Uhr schrieb Julien Salort: > Because I am using an Apache proxy, bind9 sees the incoming requests > as localhost, so allows all recursive requests from anybody. > > Does it mean that credentials have to be implemented by the webserver > ? Yes, if you want to have a reve

Re: CNAME and IPv6

Am 28.05.2024 um 12:00:09 Uhr schrieb Peter: > if I understand corrently, the use of CNAME is just a convenience > and no technical feature, right? It is technical because the query is redirected to the domain listed in the CNAME. > In lots of examples on the net, a zonefile for a domain might

Re: CNAME and IPv6

Am 28.05.2024 um 18:48:38 Uhr schrieb Peter: > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:25:03PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > ! > Now we add an IPv6 address for 'myhost'. But portforwarding > ! > doesn't work for IPv6. Instead we are required to use different > ! > addres

Re: CNAME and IPv6

Am 30.05.2024 um 00:47:56 Uhr schrieb Peter: > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:20:09PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas > wrote: ! > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 09:09:20PM +0200, Marco Moock > wrote: ! > > rinetd manages 2 separate connections and should work > with PMTUD. ! > !

Re: MDLZ user activation

Am 07.06.2024 um 10:58:27 Uhr schrieb G.W. Haywood: > On the face of your description, this sounds like a spammer who has > slightly more skill than usual. The spammer simply used the name in From: after the Nick posted tothe list) (Nick Tait via bind-users) and the mail address (bind-users@lists

Re: strange reply dumped URGENT

Am 12.07.2024 um 14:13:03 Uhr schrieb Herman Brule via bind-users: > bind to my proxy from IPv4 to IPv6 zone Why don't you simply run multiple authoritative servers, some only accessible by IPv6, some dual-stack? They are independent of each other and only the zone transfer need to work. I also

Re: strange reply dumped URGENT

Am 12.07.2024 um 14:38:58 Uhr schrieb Herman Brule: > Because the customer are into IPv6 zone So the master DNS is IPv6 only? No problem for the zone transfer. > And the EDGE router connecting IPv4 and IPv6 is internal to the data > center company, not accessible for the customer. In which way

Re: strange reply dumped URGENT

Am 12.07.2024 um 14:56:28 Uhr schrieb Herman Brule via bind-users: > The edge router receive the query, should just forward to the IP into > the named.conf.rproxy (then IPv6 master) So bind runs on this router? What is the hostname of this router? To which IP addresses does it point? -- Gruß

Re: strange reply dumped URGENT

Am Fri, 12 Jul 2024 15:51:32 -0400 schrieb Herman Brule : > Loop detected! We were referred back to '45.225.75.8' That's why I say: Have real NS records that point to unique systems. If you forward, make sure the other machine is the master. I operate DNS with 2 NS records, one dual-stack,

Re: strange reply dumped URGENT

Am Fri, 12 Jul 2024 22:44:38 -0400 schrieb Herman Brule : > For now your method fail, include I try: > > zone "ore.org.bo" { >     type master; >     file "/etc/bind/ore.org.bo.db"; > }; Only have one, exactly one master for a zone. Everything else will create a big mess. The other servers ar

!AAAA in statistics

Hello! named.stats includes that: [...] ++ Cache DB RRsets ++ [View: default] 3184 A 1059 NS 108 CNAME 8 SOA 6 PTR 1 TXT 2739 75 DS 378

v6-bias

Hello! I couldn't find anything else than https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01349 for v6-bias. Is that still relevant for current versions? Is there a reason that option isn't described in the normal documentation? I've set it to 200ms and I still see outgoing queries to IPv4 destinations that are rea

Re: v6-bias

Am 18.08.2024 um 23:44:26 Uhr schrieb Mark Andrews: > > On 18 Aug 2024, at 20:32, Marco Moock wrote: > It is. Go to the product page. Look at panel 3 “Configuration". > Click on "Administrator Reference Manual (ARM)” then enter “v6-bias” > in the search box. https:

Re: 9.18 horrendous

Am 23.08.2024 um 21:57:47 Uhr schrieb Edwardo Garcia: > I've just updated 9.18 again, as recent update, and ever since using > this 9.18 mess the load has been horrendous never ever have I > experiemnce such a clusterfcsk of a release I can understand your anger, but the first thing to notice is

Re: 9.18 horrendous

Am Fri, 23 Aug 2024 16:28:22 -0400 schrieb David Farje : > The whole point of open source software is that you as a user get > software for free You get certain freedoms because of the license. This doesn't mean it needs to be provided for free. ISC also sells BIND9 together with a support contra

automatic reverse and forwarding zones

Hello, how do ISPs automatically create the reverse and forwaring zones for their customers IP pools? For example one of their clients has the IP 2001:db::3. Its reverse zone 3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.b.d.0.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa includes a PTR pointing to 3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0