Re: [Bioc-devel] Omada package failing due to removed dependency

https://nonstationarity.sciencesconf.org/resource/page/id/7 That is, perhaps, not surprising... Package seems to be too good to be abandoned. I wonder if anyone from their lab could take over maintenance, if you still bother to ask... Best, Oleksii On

Re: [Bioc-devel] Omada package failing due to removed dependency

Hey, I haven't received any responses from the maintainer of ClusterCrit so I guess I will have to re-write the code used. How can I properly go about this and credit the authors as well? Thanks! Cheers, Sokratis On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 7:38 PM Kern, Lori wrote: > We do not allow archived

Re: [Bioc-devel] Python module "tensorflow_probability" not found

So I think Kim is interfacing to tensorflow by using the keras package from CRAN (partly authored by the Rstudio people). This package leaves it to the user to install tensorflow, which is a highly non-trivial installation task. There is some partly helpful instructions for using conda together

Re: [Bioc-devel] Python module "tensorflow_probability" not found

I'll try to get clearer on the basilisk situation; I forked your repo and will plunge in soon. It may take a while. In the mean time I hope the BBS python stack can be looked at to see what the issue might be. @Jennifer Wokaty is it possible with the recent R upgrades that tensorflow and

Re: [Bioc-devel] Python module "tensorflow_probability" not found

Thanks a lot for your response! The Config/reticulate approach in DESCRIPTION looks very neat. I hope we can use it at some point. Could the issue you are facing with the conda install be, that the package is called "tensorflow-probability" instead of "tensorflow_probability" (