Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Babel: Implement route daming with fixed delay

2023-03-06 Thread dxld
Hi Juliusz, On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 03:59:14PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > In order to prevent RTT based routing from causing persistent traffic > > oscillations we delay core rte announcement of each prefix by a > > configurable but metric invariant amount of time. > > Could you please

Re: Expiration for ROA tables until when the VRP is valid?

2023-03-06 Thread Job Snijders via Bird-users
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 01:01:36AM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote: > On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, Robert Scheck wrote: > > rpki-client recently implemented the "expires" instruction for roa-sets > > that OpenBGPD provides [1][2]. As of writing, BIRD does not seem to have > > something similar...any chance for

Re: Expiration for ROA tables until when the VRP is valid?

2023-03-06 Thread Robert Scheck
On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, Robert Scheck wrote: > rpki-client recently implemented the "expires" instruction for roa-sets > that OpenBGPD provides [1][2]. As of writing, BIRD does not seem to have > something similar...any chance for it? From my understanding this only > applies to included ROA files

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Babel: Implement route daming with fixed delay

2023-03-06 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Hi Daniel, > In order to prevent RTT based routing from causing persistent traffic > oscillations we delay core rte announcement of each prefix by a > configurable but metric invariant amount of time. Could you please explain how that works? How does it interact with cost smoothing and route

Re: [PATCH] Babel: add RFC9229 (v4 via v6) support

2023-03-06 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
>> (There's also the PMTUD problem described in RFC 9229 Section 3.) > Juliusz, do you, or any one else, have info on: > How does ${vendor} behave when reverse path filters are enabled? I was under the impression that some kinds of ICMP pakets are not subject to RPF. See RFC 4890 Section 4.3.1.

Re: [PATCH] Printf: libc independent I/O error test

2023-03-06 Thread Petr Vaněk
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 11:43:40AM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 04:34:40PM +0100, Petr Vaněk wrote: > > Printf test suite fails on systems with musl libc because tests for "%m" > > and "%M" formats expect "Input/output error" message but musl returns > > "I/O error".

Re: [PATCH] Printf: libc independent I/O error test

2023-03-06 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 04:34:40PM +0100, Petr Vaněk wrote: > Printf test suite fails on systems with musl libc because tests for "%m" > and "%M" formats expect "Input/output error" message but musl returns > "I/O error". Proposed change compares the printf output with string > returned from