Re: [RFC] Replace WireGuard AllowedIPs with IP route attribute

2023-08-28 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Juliusz, On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 07:40:51PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > I've read the whole discussion, and I'm still not clear what advantages > the proposed route attribute has over having one interface per peer. Is > it because interfaces are expensive in the Linux kernel? Or is

Re: [Babel-users] [RFC] Replace WireGuard AllowedIPs with IP route attribute

2023-08-28 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Daniel, Kyle, I've read the whole discussion, and I'm still not clear what advantages the proposed route attribute has over having one interface per peer. Is it because interfaces are expensive in the Linux kernel? Or is there some other reason why it is better to run all WG tunnels over a

Re: [Babel-users] [RFC] Replace WireGuard AllowedIPs with IP route attribute

2023-08-28 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Kyle, On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:40:48AM -0400, Kyle Rose wrote: > On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 5:25 PM Daniel Gröber wrote: > > Having read Kyle's use-case I'm thinking my original plan to extend the wg > > internal source-address filtering to use a rt lookup with our new attribute > > would not

Re: Pending bird patches and discussions for proto/babel

2023-08-28 Thread Maria Matejka via Bird-users
Lastly my v5 route selection patch should also be ready, all threads of discussion should be resolved and there are no known bugs. However I've not received any testing reports, hint, hint peeps °>° OK, will look at it as well. Please send me an owl, a pigeon or another avian carrier

BGP: connect delay timer vs connect retry timer

2023-08-28 Thread Bala Sajja
Hi, It seems where BGP connect retry timer to be kicked in use cases also, connect delay timer gets kicked in. In the below function, though bgp_setup_conn(p, conn) sets connect_timer to connect retry timer, later it's over written by bgp_start_timer(conn->connect_timer, delay) which sets