Juliusz Chroboczek writes:
>> Introduce a strict-inequality version of the modulo-comparison for this
>> purpose.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I'm a little worried about the code around line 1017:
>
> struct babel_source *s = babel_get_source(p, e, e->router_id);
> s->expires = current_time() +
> Introduce a strict-inequality version of the modulo-comparison for this
> purpose.
Thanks.
I'm a little worried about the code around line 1017:
struct babel_source *s = babel_get_source(p, e, e->router_id);
s->expires = current_time() + BABEL_GARBAGE_INTERVAL;
if
Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:15:52PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via
> Bird-users wrote:
>> Juliusz noticed there were a couple of places we were doing straight
>> inequality comparisons of seqnos in Babel. This is wrong because seqnos can
>> wrap: so we need to use the
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:15:52PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bird-users
wrote:
> Juliusz noticed there were a couple of places we were doing straight
> inequality comparisons of seqnos in Babel. This is wrong because seqnos can
> wrap: so we need to use the modulo-64k comparison function
Juliusz noticed there were a couple of places we were doing straight
inequality comparisons of seqnos in Babel. This is wrong because seqnos can
wrap: so we need to use the modulo-64k comparison function for these cases
as well.
Introduce a strict-inequality version of the modulo-comparison for
