Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain on stable

Thanks James. We are able to add the header from our server's servlet filter code. It now appends the header for each response including static html files. It seems to be working fine so far. There are instances where it still gets blocked when a link is opened on new window. I believe we need

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fire toggle events using microtasks

Contact emailsjar...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/9046 Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9775 Summary The toggle events for the popover attribute and the details element, as well as the close event for dialog elements, currently post a task to the

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Feature detection for supported clipboard formats

Thanks Yoav! I pinged the TAG review thread. From: Yoav Weiss Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2023 3:58 AM To: blink-dev Cc: Anupam Snigdha ; Sangwhan Moon ; blin...@chromium.org ; Sanket Joshi (EDGE) ; Evan Stade ; jsb...@google.com ; Chris Harrelson Subject:

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Async Clipboard API: Read unsanitized HTML and write well-formed HTML format.

(edited the subject line) From: Anupam Snigdha Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2023 4:22 PM To: blink-dev@chromium.org Cc: Sanket Joshi (EDGE) ; Evan Stade ; jsb...@google.com ; Ana Sollano Kim Subject: Intent to Implement and Ship: Async Clipboard API: Read

[blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Async Clipboard API: Read unsanitized HTML and write well-formed HTML format.

Contact emails sni...@microsoft.com, sa...@microsoft.com, est...@chromium.org, jsb...@chromium.org, asu...@chromium.org,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Session API: enterpictureinpicture action

Hi, Please update your chromestatus entry to trigger the other 5 review categories for this intent. I think it's probably the case that you ended up with the wrong feature category and need to update it, sorry for any confusion. @Jason Robbins also. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 3:35 PM 'Tommy

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

LGTM2 On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:46 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 7:17 PM Alex Turner wrote: > >> Mike: thanks for the clarification, I've added a comment to the TAG >> review and kicked off those reviews in a new entry: >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Origin Trial: Cross App and Web Attribution Measurement M120-M123

Hi, Two questions: * Can you demonstrate any substantial progress since the original OT request towards the requirements for shipping the feature? * Could

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Open popups as fullscreen windows

LGTM to experiment. Thank you for completing the privacy and security reviews! On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 9:16 AM 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > We have secured Privacy, Security and Debuggability approvals in > chromestatus for the Origin Trial. > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Relaxed CSS Nesting

LGTM3 On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 3:54 AM Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: > LGTM2 > > On 04/10/2023 11:49, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > Thanks for clarifying and verifying! :) My LGTM still stands. > > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:48 AM Anders Hartvoll Ruud > > mailto:andr...@chromium.org>> wrote: > > > > >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Close requests for CloseWatcher, , and popover=""

Hi, While Alex's concerns are totally valid to consider from a feature design perspective, I think they are better to be discussed on the WHATWG issues for this feature. I chatted offline with Alex and he agreed about that point, and agreed to post comments and questions there. So from an API

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to implement and ship: Media query support for video elements

LGTM3 On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:36:25 PM UTC-7 Scott Jehl wrote: > Thanks!! > > On Thursday, 5 October 2023 at 16:14:19 UTC-4 Dale Curtis wrote: > >> Thanks! >> > >> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 12:53 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: >> > LGTM1 >>> >>> Thanks for correcting this historical mistake! >>>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Hi All, We are facing the same problem as others. We have chrome extension page in a Iframe on top of another web apps. When the *"Block third-party cookies"* is turned on, we are getting the following error: *"DOMException: Failed to read the 'localStorage' property from 'Window': Access is

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

Regarding why change to :state() instead of :--: as is typical, it was done in order to gain consensus; in particular, the CSSWG resolution notes indicate (see comment from the chair) one motivation is to align with WHATWG

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 2:24 PM Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > Apparently +Chris Wilson had part of this discussion > with Alan Stearns in April at > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8730#issuecomment-1524167658, > and the suggestion was that if a CSS spec for a feature is "unstable" >

Re: [blink-dev] Merging a UseCounter addition

I think what you've done is fine; that being said, I probably would have just cherry-picked the specific use counter the diff uses, but I don't think it really makes a difference either way. Daniel On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 13:25, Donn Denman wrote: > Can someone review a merge of new UseCounters

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to implement and ship: Media query support for video elements

Thanks!! On Thursday, 5 October 2023 at 16:14:19 UTC-4 Dale Curtis wrote: > Thanks! > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 12:53 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> >> Thanks for correcting this historical mistake! >> >> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 21:11 Dale Curtis wrote: >> >>> Contact

[blink-dev] Merging a UseCounter addition

Can someone review a merge of new UseCounters in https://crrev.com/c/4915881 ? I'm merging a CL that adds UseCounters, but my counters are not the next sequential values due to other additions that are not being merged. I'm thinking it's OK to add those values to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. I only get usability issues related to this feature in Chrome, which to me indicates it's a Chrome issue On Fri, 6 Oct 2023, 07:53 K. Moon, wrote: > If your complaint is about the URLs (and the resulting behavior), isn't > that a site authoring issue, not a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

Thanks for the explanation. But I don't like the scroll to text fragments. They're annoying, and have never been useful. There seem to be only two ways that this feature is used: 1. The first sentence of a page is highlighted, which is completely redundant and patronising. Yes Chrome, thank you

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

The feature can be disabled in Safari https://www.reddit.com/r/MacOS/comments/14l1gcu/how_to_disable_safari_automatically_highlighting/, so it's a Chrome specific issue that it can't be disabled On Fri, 6 Oct 2023, 08:06 K. Moon, wrote: > (Incidentally, it appears Safari 16+ also supports this

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU f16 support

+cc cwallez, since he is the WebGPU lead, and can respond authoritatively if I am OOO Contact emailsrharri...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/webgpu/#shader-f16 Summary Allows for the use of the half-precision floating-point type f16 in WebGPU shaders (WGSL).

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to implement and ship: Media query support for video elements

Thanks! On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 12:53 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 > > Thanks for correcting this historical mistake! > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 21:11 Dale Curtis wrote: > >> Contact emailsdalecur...@chromium.org >> >> ExplainerNone >> > > We could almost use MDN as the explainer, other than my

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to implement and ship: Media query support for video elements

LGTM2 On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 12:53 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 > > Thanks for correcting this historical mistake! > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 21:11 Dale Curtis wrote: > >> Contact emailsdalecur...@chromium.org >> >> ExplainerNone >> > > We could almost use MDN as the explainer, other than my

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to implement and ship: Media query support for video elements

LGTM1 Thanks for correcting this historical mistake! On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 21:11 Dale Curtis wrote: > Contact emailsdalecur...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > We could almost use MDN as the explainer, other than my comment below. > > Specification >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

You haven't said where your scroll-to-text links are coming from, but I assume it's a search engine, which is the most common case. If you don't like the quality of the links, the proper place to address your complaint is to that search engine. As this feature has shipped (it appears all the way

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Hi Illia, Thanks for reaching out - does this bug answer any of your questions?: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1481485=reporter%3Ame=1 If not, could you please file a bug describing your set-up here: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/entry, and add the label

[blink-dev] Intent to implement and ship: Media query support for video elements

Contact emailsdalecur...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specification https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/media.html#loading-the-media-resource Design docs https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/source#media Summary Adds support for CSS media queries to elements used with

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

(Incidentally, it appears Safari 16+ also supports this feature, further illustrating that this is not a Chrome-specific concern.) https://caniuse.com/url-scroll-to-text-fragment On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 12:01 PM K. Moon wrote: > If the URL doesn't contain a scroll-to-text fragment, then this

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

If the URL doesn't contain a scroll-to-text fragment, then this feature doesn't get invoked. The site that serves you the URL is responsible for deciding whether or not to include a scroll-to-text fragment. On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 11:59 AM Adam Semenenko wrote: > Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

If your complaint is about the URLs (and the resulting behavior), isn't that a site authoring issue, not a Chrome issue? On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 10:25 AM Adam Semenenko wrote: > Sorry Thomas, I should have specified that I am using Android. From what I > can tell there's no way to disable this

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

Sorry Thomas, I should have specified that I am using Android. From what I can tell there's no way to disable this anti-feature on Android. Also, while the macOS option removes some distraction, Chrome still pollutes the URL with unnecessary content that's awkward to remove. (I've never wanted to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Open popups as fullscreen windows

Hi All, We have secured Privacy, Security and Debuggability approvals in chromestatus for the Origin Trial. On Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 12:19:30 PM UTC-7 Ajay Rahatekar wrote: > Thank you Yoav, for your comments. We have requested Privacy and Security > reviews in chromestatus. The

[blink-dev] Re: Unstanding StyleSheet

I'll join the request, if possible and if I am not in the way, it's something I'm also interested in. > I am trying to find one point in code from where I can pick final style for any node. As far as I understood from reading the code, the correct point should be

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture

Oh!! You're right, i no longer need the Chrome flag. So awesome! Good job on this feature, love it! On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 4:18:09 AM UTC-3 François Beaufort wrote: > This API shipped in Chrome 116. See > https://developer.chrome.com/docs/web-platform/document-picture-in-picture/ > >

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

Oh yes, I recall this now. :) IIRC, we generally follow this convention anyway; that feature had some communication gaps, but we did follow that convention. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 5:24 PM Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > Apparently +Chris Wilson had part of this discussion > with Alan Stearns in

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

See https://web.dev/text-fragments/#disabling-text-fragments for disabling the feature. On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 8:51 AM Anton Bershanskyi wrote: > Hi Adam, > > > Is it still not possible to disable this distraction yet? > > Chrome used to have an option to disable this feature, but the flag was

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture

This API shipped in Chrome 116. See https://developer.chrome.com/docs/web-platform/document-picture-in-picture/ On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 1:26 AM Mariano M wrote: > Hey, is there any official release date for the new PiP window without > having to have the chrome flag enabled? Thanks! > > On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

Hi Adam, > Is it still not possible to disable this distraction yet? Chrome used to have an option to disable this feature, but the flag was removed. It is possible to remove highlights with extensions. I found "Disable Google Search Text Highlights"