Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

Thanks PhistucK. So why isn't there an option to disable the text highlighting in the web API? . The first poster in the thread started sharing qualitative feedback about this feature, so it seem seems appropriate to continue that. On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, 11:04 PhistucK, wrote: > crbug.com is the

Re: [blink-dev] Re: PSA: Web MIDI Permissions Prompt Change

Hi Alex, We've been having trouble finishing up the engineering work, hence the delay. I'm trying to make some workflow adjustments now. Best, Michael On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 2:30 PM Alex Russell wrote: > What's the rationale for this change? Is it documented anywhere? I don't > see an

Re: [blink-dev] Re: PSA: Web MIDI Permissions Prompt Change

In case you were asking about the permissions prompt change instead of the schedule change: This is not an API change and that's why we are sending out a PSA instead of an intent. The nature of the permission prompt change is described in the Chromestatus entry. Please let me know if you have

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

That is a question for the standards working group - https://github.com/WICG/scroll-to-text-fragment/issues ☆*PhistucK* On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:38 PM Adam Semenenko wrote: > Thanks PhistucK. So why isn't there an option to disable the text > highlighting in the web API? . > > The first

Re: [blink-dev] Re: PSA: Web MIDI Permissions Prompt Change

What's the rationale for this change? Is it documented anywhere? I don't see an Explainer linked. On Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 2:11 PM 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > This feature is now planned to ship in M121. > > On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 12:59:23 PM UTC-7 Ajay

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Re-implement and Ship: CSS Font Loading API - FontFaceSet: check() method

Hi Yoav, Yes, Safari and Firefox support the check method [1], and I confirmed it. The test failures are due to other factors (e.g., pixel mismatches), not FontFaceSet::check(). Sub-tests on the check() method have passed. [1] https://caniuse.com/mdn-api_fontfaceset_check -- ChangSeok > On

[blink-dev] Re: PSA: Web MIDI Permissions Prompt Change

This feature is now planned to ship in M121. On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 12:59:23 PM UTC-7 Ajay Rahatekar wrote: > This feature is planned to ship in M118. > > On Thursday, April 13, 2023 at 10:56:40 AM UTC-7 Ajay Rahatekar wrote: > >> A correction. The permission prompt will not be released on

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API feature (aggregation coordinator selection)

LGTM3 On Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 4:20 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:05 AM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> On 10/16/23 7:48 AM, Nan Lin wrote: >> >> Thanks Mike, please see the inline comment. >> >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:41 AM Mike Taylor >> wrote: >> >>> >>>

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: New baseline format for test-harness tests

Thanks, this looks great. I particularly like the omission of PASS lines. Christian On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 2:33 PM Weizhong Xia wrote: > Yes, here is the design document: >

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: New baseline format for test-harness tests

Yes, here is the design document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FsbRm2gXwFnhyJYaE-wz2fagRABkuHCK4KCYb6JEhMQ/edit?resourcekey=0-47lxaiexsP8wfuzOtQhkXw#heading=h.103wg95souql thanks, Weizhong On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:54 AM Christian Biesinger < cbiesin...@chromium.org> wrote: >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAssembly Multi-Memory

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 7:42 PM Alex Russell wrote: > It's unclear why the TAG is not being informed or consulted. This has deep > architectural implications for DOM integration and I'd expect to see those > explained and worked. > As written in the ITS, a TAG review is not required as per

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: New baseline format for test-harness tests

Interesting! When you say "machine parsable", I assume you mean you want to detect which subtests passed/failed? Could you share an example of the new format? Thanks! On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 9:07 PM 'Weizhong Xia' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Blink Developers > > We want

[blink-dev] PSA: request TAG feedback early!

Hey all, A frequent occurrence in recent reviews have been sizeable features arriving at Intent-to-Ship with no effort made in previous intents to ask the TAG for advice and no reason given for avoiding this part of the processes. This slows down launches while we pause consideration of an

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAssembly Multi-Memory

It's unclear why the TAG is not being informed or consulted. This has deep architectural implications for DOM integration and I'd expect to see those explained and worked. On Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 10:08 AM Clemens Backes wrote: > Contact emailscleme...@google.com > > ExplainerWe are ready for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU f16 support

Thanks Sangwhan. Provisional LGTM3, pending an update on TAG discussion. If TAG wants to discuss, we can leave flipped on for Beta while it resolves. Best, Alex On Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 10:19 AM Sangwhan Moon wrote: > Just to be on record, this is small enough of change that it won't require >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU f16 support

Just to be on record, this is small enough of change that it won't require a TAG review. I'll double check with the group and get back to you if they want one.SangwhanOn Oct 17, 2023, at 22:32, Ryan Harrison wrote:I received an email from the tool after the most recent approval stating the next

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAssembly Multi-Memory

Contact emailscleme...@google.com ExplainerWe are ready for shipping the Multi-Memory proposal for WebAssembly, which recently moved to phase 4 according to the WebAssembly W3C process. Specification https://github.com/WebAssembly/multi-memory/blob/main/proposals/multi-memory/Overview.md Design

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Unrestricted access to performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory()

Clarified with Jason offline. Thanks again! Reviews are triggered now. PTAL. On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 8:44 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:45 PM Lutz Vahl wrote: > >> I've adjusted the stage to 'Origin Trial' and added the OT milestones. >> Does this trigger the relevant

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

Thanks all! A quick update -- the chromestatus reviews are now all complete. On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 10:37 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM3 > On 10/5/23 6:51 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > LGTM2 > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:46 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 7:17 PM

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Unrestricted access to performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory()

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:45 PM Lutz Vahl wrote: > I've adjusted the stage to 'Origin Trial' and added the OT milestones. > Does this trigger the relevant reviews? > It does not.. +Jason Robbins - can you assist? > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:35 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> Oops! Can you start

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Unrestricted access to performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory()

I've adjusted the stage to 'Origin Trial' and added the OT milestones. Does this trigger the relevant reviews? On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:35 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > Oops! Can you start the reviews for privacy, security and debuggability in > the new status entry? > > On Tuesday, October 17, 2023

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Exponential Functions

LGTM3 On Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 4:05 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:53 AM Philip Jägenstedt > wrote: > >> LGTM1, when Gecko and WebKit have already shipped there isn't much to >> discuss :) >> >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:00 AM Daniil Sakhapov >> wrote: >> >>>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fenced Frame - Functionality Updates

Hi Yoav, Apologies, I sent this I2S out before we had gone through the privacy sandbox required pre-review. You can hold off on reviewing this until we get approval. However, to answer your questions: This explainer section

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU f16 support

I received an email from the tool after the most recent approval stating the next step is: 'Check existing Lighthouse audits for correctness.` I am not particularly familiar with Lighthouse, so not sure if this is something

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Unrestricted access to performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory()

Oops! Can you start the reviews for privacy, security and debuggability in the new status entry? On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 1:34:44 PM UTC+2 Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM to experiment M120 to M121 > > On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 2:25:00 PM UTC+2 Michael Lippautz wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 13,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Unrestricted access to performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory()

LGTM to experiment M120 to M121 On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 2:25:00 PM UTC+2 Michael Lippautz wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 3:58 PM Michael Lippautz > wrote: > >> Thanks! >> >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:52 AM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> This is exciting! Thanks for working on this!!

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU f16 support

LGTM2 On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 1:56 AM Ken Russell wrote: > Got it - thanks Chris. > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 4:54 PM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I don't think you need to do anything else. We'll re-review this intent >> at our next meeting Wednesday morning PDT. >> >> The

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Re-implement and Ship: CSS Font Loading API - FontFaceSet: check() method

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 8:15 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 10/16/23 1:35 PM, Alex Russell wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 1:01 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote: > >> Contact emails >> changseok...@bytedance.com, shivami...@gmail.com >> >> Specification >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fenced Frame - Functionality Updates

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 9:42 PM 'Liam Brady' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emails > > shivani...@chromium.org d...@chromium.org jkar...@chromium.org > lbr...@google.com > Explainer(s) > > Send Automatic Beacons To All Registered Destinations > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API feature (aggregation coordinator selection)

LGTM2 On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:05 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM1 > On 10/16/23 7:48 AM, Nan Lin wrote: > > Thanks Mike, please see the inline comment. > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:41 AM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> >> Interoperability and Compatibility >> >> The change is backwards compatible,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:42 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM1 > On 10/15/23 11:07 AM, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback, I wasn't aware they were mandatory. The steps > have been started, just awaiting feedback from Security and Privacy > reviewers. I've received

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Exponential Functions

LGTM2 On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:53 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > LGTM1, when Gecko and WebKit have already shipped there isn't much to > discuss :) > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:00 AM Daniil Sakhapov > wrote: > >> Contact emailssakha...@chromium.org, seo...@chromium.org >> >> Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: URL.canParse

LGTM3 https://wpt.fyi/results/url?label=master=experimental=canparse shows this is indeed passing on Firefox and Safari. On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:34 PM Alex Russell wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:24 AM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> On 10/13/23 6:08 PM, Jeremy Roman wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Exponential Functions

LGTM1, when Gecko and WebKit have already shipped there isn't much to discuss :) On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:00 AM Daniil Sakhapov wrote: > Contact emailssakha...@chromium.org, seo...@chromium.org > > Specification > https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#exponent-funcs > > Summary > > Add css

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Exponential Functions

Contact emailssakha...@chromium.org, seo...@chromium.org Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#exponent-funcs Summary Add css exponential functions: pow(), sqrt(), hypot(), log(), exp() to CSS math expressions. Blink componentBlink>CSS

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS Upgrades

Fantastic, thanks for the update. Hope it sticks! -mike On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 20:15 Chris Thompson wrote: > We enabled HTTPS-Upgrades by default on trunk last week, and are currently > rolling out to 100% Stable. > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 10:42 AM Chris Thompson > wrote: > >> This week we