Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial : HTMLVideoElement-specific Prefixed Fullscreen API

2024-01-22 Thread Domenic Denicola
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 7:55 AM Thomas Guilbert wrote: > Good point about the most used APIs being the boolean properties! The APIs > are now only aliases for the standard non-prefixed fullscreen APIs (see > this code for the current implementation >

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial : HTMLVideoElement-specific Prefixed Fullscreen API

2024-01-22 Thread Thomas Guilbert
Good point about the most used APIs being the boolean properties! The APIs are now only aliases for the standard non-prefixed fullscreen APIs (see this code for the current implementation

RE: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: New ALPS code point

2024-01-22 Thread 'Erik Anderson' via blink-dev
Is the ALPS draft being actively worked on? Various teams at Microsoft that own web sites leveraging client hints have expressed interest in using it, but the lack of a finalized standard has significantly slowed conversations with the teams that own the server code that would need to add

Re: [blink-dev] New API owner: Domenic Denicola

2024-01-22 Thread Jeremy Roman
+1; Domenic makes a great addition to the API owners. On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 3:56 PM Johnny Stenback wrote: > It makes me very happy to see Domenic added to API owners. Congratulations > Domenic! > > Cheers, > Johnny > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 7:29 AM Christian Biesinger < >

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Soft Navigation Heuristics

2024-01-22 Thread Ian Clelland
Contact emailsiclell...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://bit.ly/soft-navigation https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eUyQg3YLEmYjrTMC3p-F1MilECwCynhM6WIbIo05SPU/edit Specificationhttps://wicg.github.io/soft-navigations Summary Exposes the (experimental) soft navigation heuristics [1] to web

Re: [blink-dev] New API owner: Domenic Denicola

2024-01-22 Thread Johnny Stenback
It makes me very happy to see Domenic added to API owners. Congratulations Domenic! Cheers, Johnny On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 7:29 AM Christian Biesinger wrote: > Congratulations! > > Christian > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 3:34 AM 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove non-standard appearance keywords

2024-01-22 Thread Di Zhang
2024 Q1 update: The new deprecation warnings has been in stable for multiple milestones: 118 (October 2023) to 121 (January 2024). The high usage appearance values are still getting used at similar rate. *NonStandardAppearanceValuesHighUsage*: (September 2023 -> January 2024 numbers) *

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Allow Cross-Origin Subframes to Send Automatic Beacons

2024-01-22 Thread 'Liam Brady' via blink-dev
Hi Mike, "crossOrigin=true" is just a typo. "crossOrigin" was the original naming convention for "crossOriginExposed". It was renamed during code review, but I forgot to update the I2S wording to match that. We chose to not go with Permissions-Policy for a few reasons. First is that for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate non-standard declarative shadow DOM serialization

2024-01-22 Thread Mason Freed
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 8:05 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: > Yeah, I think the risk is low here. >> > Great, thanks! > FWIW, I couldn't find any relevant github or contact info for this library > but if you had better luck finding contact information, we might as well > file an issue or send an

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate non-standard declarative shadow DOM serialization

2024-01-22 Thread 'Vladimir Levin' via blink-dev
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 7:54 PM Mason Freed wrote: > > > On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 12:27:50 PM UTC-8 vmp...@google.com wrote: > > Interoperability and Compatibility > > The use counter for getInnerHTML() (https://chromestatus.com/ > metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/3874) shows 0.04% of

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: New ALPS code point

2024-01-22 Thread Yoav Weiss (@Shopify)
Is the old code point defined somewhere? Would it be possible to add such a definition to one of the I-Ds? Or is this something that's not traditionally defined in IETF drafts? On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 4:03 PM Victor Tan wrote: > Currently, It's on the code: >

Re: [blink-dev] New API owner: Domenic Denicola

2024-01-22 Thread Christian Biesinger
Congratulations! Christian On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 3:34 AM 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Congratulations, Dominic, and thanks for your time! > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 9:59 PM Rick Byers wrote: > >> Hi blink-dev, >> +Domenic Denicola has volunteered to

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: New ALPS code point

2024-01-22 Thread Victor Tan
Currently, It's on the code: https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/master/include/openssl/tls1.h?pli=1#247 Once we standardize the ALPS RFC draft, we can finalize the value. Hope this helps. On Saturday, January 20, 2024 at 7:50:46 PM UTC-5 Chris Harrelson wrote: > Thanks for

Re: [blink-dev] New API owner: Domenic Denicola

2024-01-22 Thread 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev
Congratulations, Dominic, and thanks for your time! On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 9:59 PM Rick Byers wrote: > Hi blink-dev, > +Domenic Denicola has volunteered to donate his > time and considerable web platform expertise to reviewing intent threads as > an API owner. Domenic is very active in the