Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Continue Experimenting: Tabbed Web Apps

For what milestones do you want to extend the experiment for? On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 3:39 PM Matt Giuca wrote: > Contact emailsloubr...@google.com, glen...@chromium.org > , mgi...@chromium.org, bre...@chromium.org > > Explainer >

Re: [blink-dev] Android shared workers

All, On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 2:01:30 AM UTC-7 Kenji Baheux wrote: Things are a bit different these days. That said, there are other interop requests that compete for the team's bandwidth, beside their main projects. The other requests have clearer signals of impact *at the moment*.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Used color scheme root scrollbars

Thanks for taking a look and your feedback! Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. On Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 3:23:02 PM UTC-8 William Smith wrote: > Thank you! And just to be clear, I personally don't see it as a problem at > all, I was only curious. I actually

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Used color scheme root scrollbars

Thank you! And just to be clear, I personally don't see it as a problem at all, I was only curious. I actually think this should have shipped along with dark mode back in 2019, but better late than never. On Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 5:22:14 PM UTC-5 Yaroslav Shalivskyy wrote: > Hello

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RegExp duplicate named capture groups

Contact emailspth...@chromium.org, s...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2721 Summary https://github.com/tc39/proposal-duplicate-named-capturing-groups Blink componentBlink>JavaScript>Regexp

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Speculation Rules Prefetch: Vary on particular cookies

Contact emailsjbro...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/issues/302 https://mnot.github.io/I-D/draft-nottingham-http-availability-hints.html#name-cookie SpecificationNone Summary See https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/issues/302 The prefetch cache should allow

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove Web SQL

Hi Hans, It's unfortunate that you find yourself in this situation. I'm not a Google or Chromium representative, but official representatives answered this exact question before and consistently rejected any

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove Web SQL

Thanks for the explanation Panos. That makes sense. OK so... please forgive me folks. I know this is a crazy thing to ask, I really do, but I need to take the shot. Is there ANY possibility whatsoever that access to the API can be preserved through 124? I've been grinding away for a year on a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation debug mode for auctionReportBuyers reporting

Alex and Yoav, This particular addition is exposed only as an optional parameter on the existing `AuctionAdConfig` dictionary passed to `navigator.runAdAuction()`. So, I'm not aware of any web visibility from removing the new `auctionReportBuyerDebugModeConfig` field (if it was already having no

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate: X-Requested-With in WebView

This effectively allowing all the malicious app devs to steal content from other website, I fail to understand why people want this to be removed unless they are planning to steal content from websites, if they are not planning to do anything to hurt the website owners there is no fear of

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Compute Pressure

This has not been implemented, no. I believe this was discussed with the Google UX team. Maybe Ajay can follow up with them? On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 3:18 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: > > Asking as a user, the spec draft recommends that user agents... > >> ... show some form of user-visible

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation debug mode for auctionReportBuyers reporting

Alex T - can you expand on the other debug modes that are already shipped? Are they also tied to 3P cookie eligibility? If so, I agree that having all these mechanisms activated together and stop working together makes sense. On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 11:04 PM Alex Russell wrote: > Removal being