[blink-dev] RE: Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: reporting timeouts & multiple-bids

2024-05-21 Thread 'Erik Anderson' via blink-dev
Hi, Thanks for reaching out. We’ve reviewed the proposal and don’t have any significant concerns. We’ll continue providing feedback via GitHub where appropriate. Thanks, Erik From: Paul Jensen Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 5:42 AM To: Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) Cc: blink-dev ; Erik Anderson

RE: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: New ALPS code point

2024-01-24 Thread 'Erik Anderson' via blink-dev
Thanks, it will be helpful to make sure this is documented outside of Chromium. I will also chat with some folks on Microsoft’s end that both own server implementations and have more IETF experience to explore how we can help with moving things forward. From: Victor Tan Sent: Wednesday,

RE: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: New ALPS code point

2024-01-22 Thread 'Erik Anderson' via blink-dev
Is the ALPS draft being actively worked on? Various teams at Microsoft that own web sites leveraging client hints have expressed interest in using it, but the lack of a finalized standard has significantly slowed conversations with the teams that own the server code that would need to add

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM (was WebID)

2024-01-19 Thread 'Erik Anderson' via blink-dev
Hi everyone, The Microsoft Edge team was recently queried by an IDP about Microsoft Edge's support status for FedCM. We are also shipping it and will continue to support it. If you're an RP or IDP building support for Chrome, you should assume that your scenario will work equally well in

RE: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

2021-11-30 Thread 'Erik Anderson' via blink-dev
Given this specifically calls out subresources and the design doc lists "the case of navigations" as "followup work," you're explicitly not touching how navigations (top-level or an iframe) work at this stage, correct? I expect the most significant compat impact to come from Windows apps that