-one strikes again!
>
> Yes, 132 inclusive is the right endpoint
>
>
>> /Daniel
>> On 2024-05-28 18:58, Vladimir Levin wrote:
>>
>> LGTM to experiment from 127 to 133 inclusive
>>
>> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:54 PM Di Zhang wrote:
>>
>>>
ans do
> you have in place to ensure that the previously broken sites will be ready
> for this change in ~9 months?
>
> Either way, please let us know how many (and which) milestonesyou are
> requesting for the deprecation trial.
>
> thanks!
> Mike
> On 5/13/24 2:27 PM
- or
>> are you requesting a deprecation trial?
>>
> FWIW, according to
> https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#deprecation-trial,
> deprecation trials also only run for up to 6 milestones before extensions
>
>
>> On 5/10/24 12:36 PM, Di Zhang wro
Contact emails
dizha...@chromium.org
dom-...@google.com
*Experiment Goals*The feature KeyboardFocusableScrollers changes the
focusability of a a scroll container. This is an important improvement to
help make scrollers and contents within scrollers more accessible to all
users. The goal of
28, 2024 at 5:17:47 AM UTC-8 Manuel Rego wrote:
>
>
> On 23/02/2024 21:42, Di Zhang wrote:
> > Specification
> >
> > https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/8413
> > <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/8413>
>
> What's the status of this
Contact emailsdizha...@chromium.org
ExplainerNone
Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/8413
Summary
CSS property writing-mode allow elements to go vertical, but users cannot
set the direction in which value changes. With this feature, we are
allowing the form control elements
Contact emailsdizha...@chromium.org
ExplainerNone
Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-4/#reading-order-items
Summary
The reading-order-items CSS property controls the order in which elements
in a flex or grid layout are rendered to speech or are navigated to when
using (linear)
for being flexible here!
>>
>> LGTM1 to deprecate the first set of keywords (below < 0.001% use). Thanks
>> for coming back to us about the second set.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 4:18:11 PM UTC-7 Di Zhang wr
://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/8413
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 10:45:45 AM UTC-7 Di Zhang wrote:
> Hi! Thanks for the quick LGTM, sending a quick update on feature as we are
> preparing to ship part of it in 118.
>
> Due to a bug for the text based form controls (crbug.com
Chromium.
>
> LGTM3
>
> /Daniel
> On 2023-08-02 18:02, Chris Harrelson wrote:
>
> LGTM2
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 9:01 AM Alex Russell
> wrote:
>
>> LGTM1
>>
>> On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 4:31:20 PM UTC-7 Di Zhang wrote:
>>
>>> Contac
removed and I'd be happy to see this
> ship.
>
> /Daniel
> On 2023-07-27 22:01, Di Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I had a talk with Chris and Mason, who helped me better understand the
> steps for 2-3. I will aggregate more metrics data and share them in a
> google doc here
Contact emailsdizha...@chromium.org
ExplainerNone
Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-4/#block-flow
Summary
CSS property writing-mode should be enabled for form controls elements as
it will allow lines of text to be laid out horizontally or vertically. With
this feature, we
differences once disabled?
* Why are some of these value's counter higher than the aggregated
WebFeature::kCSSValueAppearanceNonStandard
Thanks,
Di
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 5:04:17 PM UTC-7 Di Zhang wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> It's great to have support on this deprecation. Since w
but it might be better if we agree to revisit the removal date
> based on evidence in the future. WDYT?
>
> Best,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 4:03:15 PM UTC-7 Di Zhang wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the feedback. The counter does feel high, I will follow the
;caret" in the past, and it
>>>> caused issues like crbug.com/944023.
>>>>
>>>> The counter for this is
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4416. The
>>>> value is 0.005 - 0.02.
>>>>
>>>> I r
Replaced this Intent to Ship with correct/better
email: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/gfxScdL8O3g
On Tuesday, June 27, 2023 at 3:30:30 PM UTC-7 Di Zhang wrote:
> Contact emailsdizha...@chromium.org
>
> ExplainerNone
>
> Specificationhttps://drafts.css
Contact emailsdizha...@chromium.org
ExplainerNone
Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#appearance-switching
Summary
Since only standard appearance keywords should be supported, we are
removing the appearance (and -webkit-appearance) keywords that shouldn't be
supported anymore: *
Contact emailsdizha...@chromium.org
ExplainerNone
Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#appearance-switching
Summary
Since only standard appearance keywords should be supported, we are
removing the appearance (and -webkit-appearance) keywords that are only
meant to be used
l of changing the spec here. It might be worth
>> opening an issue to discuss whether any changes are appropriate, but in
>> general the spec is intentional about allowing each browser to make
>> different choices on what it considers focusable, and in which ways things
from this feature
status and will update WPT accordingly.
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 7:08:37 AM UTC-7 Mike Taylor wrote:
> On 4/27/23 5:28 PM, Di Zhang wrote:
>
> Contact emails h...@chromium.org, xiaoche...@chromium.org,
> dizha...@chromium.org
>
> Explainer None
>
&g
Contact emailsh...@chromium.org, xiaoche...@chromium.org,
dizha...@chromium.org
ExplainerNone
Specification
None
Design docsNone
Summary
Improves accessibility by making scroll containers focusable using
sequential focus navigation. Today, the tab key doesn't focus scrollers
unless tabIndex
iss
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do you know the reasons for not prompting the user in that case?
>>>> I wonder if there's some history here. +Carlos IL
>>>> +Emily Stark +Mike West
>>>> - do y'all know?
>>>>
>>>> O
Contact emailsdizha...@chromium.org
Specification
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/browsing-the-web.html#checking-if-unloading-is-user-canceled
Summary
Change beforeunload handler to show confirm dialog when preventDefault()
gets called.
Blink componentBlink>DOM
23 matches
Mail list logo
