Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

karounds, potentially > affecting the user experience of our app? > > I eagerly await your advice on this matter. Your assistance and > contribution are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your continued support. > > Best regards. > > On Thursday, Se

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

flag enabled. > > Thanks, > > On Monday, September 25, 2023 at 6:57:16 PM UTC+5:30 Kyra Seevers wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Wanted to keep the thread updated and confirm that we have not shipped to >> Stable 100% yet. We will be delaying another day or two due to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Hi all, Wanted to keep the thread updated and confirm that we have not shipped to Stable 100% yet. We will be delaying another day or two due to internal delays. Thanks, Kyra On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 8:53 AM Kyra Seevers wrote: > Hi Chinmay, > > Thanks for reaching out! Due to intern

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Hi Kyra, > > Do we have an update on what time the feature will be rolled out today? > > Cheers, > Chinmay > > On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 18:06:57 UTC+10 Kyra Seevers wrote: > >> Hi Muhammad, >> >> I have filed this bug for the issue: >> ht

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 1

, 2023 at 11:02 AM Kyra Seevers > wrote: > >> Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 1 (Begin >> storing triple partition keys for :visited links) >> >> Contact emails >> >> kyraseev...@chromium.org >> >> Explainer

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 1

Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 1 (Begin storing triple partition keys for :visited links) Contact emails kyraseev...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/kyraseevers/Partitioning-visited-links-history Specification None yet - currently getting feedback

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

t it fixed asap. > > Thanks > Ahmed > > On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 2:03:55 PM UTC+5 Kyra Seevers wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Another quick update: we began the rollout to 50% stable today. >> >> We will roll-out to 100% of Stable users on approximately

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

gt; the deprecation trial. >>>> >>>> I've contacted Salesforce support to see if they can sign-up and >>>> activate the deprecation trial, but they asked me to reach out to Chrome >>>> team to see if Chrome team can create a ticket with Salesforce and hel

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

ing to understand the timing here. >>> Currently, the partitioning is under a flag. >>> Are you saying that the flag would be turned on to 100% of Desktop and >>> Android users on Sept 8th THIS YEAR?? >>> >>> That's a huge and extremely fast change, wow. >>&g

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

org/g/blink-dev/c/24hK6DKJnqY/m/Tts2gjrEBwAJ) >> ? >> >> Once we begin the gradual roll-out, we'll provide a estimated rollout >> schedule on this thread (I hesitate to do so now - it's hard to know when >> we will begin exactly). >> >> thanks, >> Mike &g

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

the coming months. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Mike. I trust your and wanderview@'s judgement here - I know >>>>>> how hard y'all have been willing to work in the past to get the right >>>>>> thin

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

>>>> thoughtful and careful roll-out. But I trust Mike and his team to engage >>>> with impacted folks to make sure it goes smoothly, as they did with UA >>>> reduction. >>>> >>> -- >>> >> You received this message because you are

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Partitioning :visited links history

wrote: > >> Amazing work that we should've done long ago. Thanks for taking this on!! >> >> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:46 PM Kyra Seevers >> wrote: >> >>> Contact emails >>> >>> kyraseev...@chromium.org >>> >>> Explainer >&

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Partitioning :visited links history

Contact emails kyraseev...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/kyraseevers/Partitioning-visited-links-history Specification TBD Summary To eliminate user browsing history leaks, anchor elements will be styled as :visited if and only if they have been visited from the same top-level

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Allow cookie domain attributes to be the empty string

Contact emailskyraseev...@chromium.org, miketa...@chromium.org, jadekess...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1332 https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1709 Specification

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Allow cookie domain attributes to be the empty string

Contact emailskyraseev...@chromium.org, miketa...@chromium.org, jadekess...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1332 https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1709 Specification

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Allow cookie domain attributes to be the empty string

es specified Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status https://chromestatus.com/feature/5674723800252416 This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status <https://www.chromestatus.com/>. -- Kyra Seevers (she/her) | Software Engineer | kyraseev...@google.com | 617-575