Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM to extend the deprecation trial M127-M132 inclusive On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:44 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 5/22/24 8:11 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 8:55 PM Mike Taylor wrote: ** *Contact

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-size-adjust with the two-value syntax

LGTM2 On 5/23/24 12:06 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: Thank you for looking into the test failures, ChangSeok! LGTM1 to align with Firefox and Safari on the remaining failures (except the reftests with minor pixel differences) and shipping! On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:05 PM ChangSeok Oh

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Keyboard-focusable scroll containers Opt Out

trial run for 9 months. It might be ok to limit this to 6-months, but would like the option to extend the depreciation period if needed. On Friday, May 10, 2024 at 12:38:47 PM UTC-7 Vladimir Levin wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 2:18 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Is there a chromestatus

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Importmap integrity

I'm inclined to LGTM this now - but don't see a lot of harm waiting for 1 additional week (per Mozilla's request in the not-public minutes). Happy to do so before, so long as the HTML PR lands. On 5/22/24 5:15 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:29 AM Yoav Weiss

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unrestricted WebUSB (available only to Isolated Web Apps)

Could you please request the various Privacy, Security, Enterprise, etc. review gates in your chromestatus entry? On 5/22/24 1:08 PM, 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails mattreyno...@chromium.org Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Dispatch selectionchange event per element

Yes, agree. Can we please request a position from Mozilla at https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/new? On 5/22/24 6:43 PM, 'Daniel Clark' via blink-dev wrote: Yeah, that’s what I was trying to get at – the Intent implies that Gecko has also shipped the breaking change but it

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

On 5/22/24 8:11 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 8:55 PM Mike Taylor wrote: ** *Contact emails* * miketa...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/wanderview/quota-storage-partitioning/blob/main/explainer.md

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

** *Contact emails* * miketa...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/wanderview/quota-storage-partitioning/blob/main/explainer.md Specification None Summary We shipped

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate Mutation Events

LGTM3. I had a slight concern about the quilljs usage - even though they've minted a new version, we know that getting sites to update is a major hurdle. That said, after reading through the comments and linked issues on upstream repos (react-quill, etc) - nobody seems to be describing any

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience ads reporting - allow cross-origin subframes to send reportEvent() beacons

nd "?1" defined in RFC8941 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8941#name-booleans>. Even though this isn't what's preferred, I think it should still be fine to keep in place for now, and being consistent with the rest of the Protected Audience API is always a plus. O

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature: Referrer Policy for Attributionsrc Requests

LGTM2 (and yes, please don't emit other info in future intents - it really helps with reviews!) On 5/20/24 1:19 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM1. This looks like a small, well-considered change that makes the platform more consistent. I agree the compat risks are small. From what I

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Page Embedded Permission Control

Sorry - got too excited. LGTM to experiment % requesting the Security, Privacy, Debuggability bits. On 5/16/24 1:28 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks - LGTM to experiment from M126 to M131 inclusive. On 5/16/24 1:26 PM, Penelope McLachlan wrote: Sorry for not including that! Origin trial

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Page Embedded Permission Control

Thanks - LGTM to experiment from M126 to M131 inclusive. On 5/16/24 1:26 PM, Penelope McLachlan wrote: Sorry for not including that! Origin trial desktop last: 131 On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:23 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi! I see a start milestone of 126 - do you have a desired

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Page Embedded Permission Control

Hi! I see a start milestone of 126 - do you have a desired milestone end date? On 5/16/24 1:20 PM, 'Penelope McLachlan' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails andypa...@google.com , pjmclach...@google.com , eng...@google.com

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM multi IDP in single get() call

at 7:55:09 PM UTC-5 Mike Taylor wrote: Could you please request reviews for the privacy/security/debuggability review gates in your chromestatus entry? On 2/21/24 3:21 PM, Nicolás Peña wrote: Contact emails

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Automatic Fullscreen Content Setting

e. extending user control beyond Isolated Web Apps). On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:43 PM Mike Taylor wrote: It would be nice for the PR to be reviewed and approved, even without other stakeho

Re: [blink-dev] New API owner: Vladimir Levin!

Congrats Vlad! On 5/15/24 12:22 PM, danakj wrote: Congrats, Vlad :) On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:19 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: Hi all, I'd like to welcome Vlad as our newest API owner. He is a long-time member of the Blink community that many of you know well, and has quite a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Multi-argument alt text in CSS Generated Content

From what I can tell, this shipped in Firefox a few days ago, and should be in 127: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1281158#c26 LGTM1 On 5/13/24 4:15 PM, 'Daniel Clark' via blink-dev wrote: /> Gecko: No signal (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1281158//)/ /> It's

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Automatic Fullscreen Content Setting

It would be nice for the PR to be reviewed and approved, even without other stakeholder support. Additionally - the explainer mentions a few options for feature detection. Any progress on that front? Or is it just hypothetical? On 5/9/24 3:04 PM, Mike Wasserman wrote: Sure. I'll note that

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Conversion to RGB in VideoFrame.copyTo()

to know which part exactly is causing an error. On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 12:25 PM Mike Taylor wrote: I see that WebKit raised an API concern around detectability <https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/341#issuecomment-2099746809>. In your reply, you said &quo

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC encoded transform - Constructor with custom Metadata (originally Modify Metadata functions)

Thanks for the doc. It sounds like the design evolved during the OT based on fedback from the WG, and at least one partner was satisfied with the shape and functionality. LGTM1 On 5/14/24 8:05 AM, Guido Urdaneta wrote: Here is a doc with feedback from the Origin Trial. There were two

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Conversion to RGB in VideoFrame.copyTo()

ut a copy. In a way this change extends variety of export formatsfor all of them.     So lots of things can be exported to RGB bitmaps without a canvas now. -  AudioData has a way to be exported into different sampling formats. On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 9:41 AM Mike Taylor wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Element Capture

OK - thanks for the clarification. I would ask that you get in touch with every registered origin - expiring the experiment early may be surprising. LGTM1 to experiment from M127 to M132 inclusive. On 5/14/24 12:08 PM, Elad Alon wrote: I'm asking for a break-off period starting July 1 and

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSSPageRule to inherit from CSSGroupingRule

perfectly how the tooling-related scripts might handle sites in the wild that might ship the problematic patterns). LGTM1 to ship. On 5/9/24 6:16 AM, Morten Stenshorne wrote: On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 17:18, Mike Taylor wrote: On 5/8/24 3:37 AM, Morten Stenshorne wrote: Intero

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Media Previews opt-out

FWIW, a deprecation trial can surpass 6 milestones - but they require sufficient justification as well as 3 LGTMs. That said, I'm not sure I understand the request here. I read the linked "Chrome Camera and Mic Previews" document, but I think the Rollout plan section is assuming more info

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

On 5/12/24 10:30 PM, fantasai wrote: On 5/2/24 16:43, Mason Freed wrote: I think it’s a bit unfair to call this “shipping the first draft”. I didn't call it one. Your responses in this thread are often not to what I've actually been writing. Please be less sloppy in your reading, it's

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Element Capture

Note: Because you're asking for a renewal of 6 milestones, this will require 3 LGTMs. Can you clarify which milestones you're asking for? You've written "(2024-May-14 to 2024-Jun-04)" - that range maps to M125 and M126 stable releases. On 5/10/24 6:44 AM, 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Origin Trial for Third Party Cookie Deprecation

This intent is also missing the normal info we have in I2Es, but I found https://chromestatus.com/feature/5133113939722240. LGTM to experiment from M127 to M130 inclusive. On 5/10/24 9:38 AM, Joshua Hood wrote: Contact emails j...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Keyboard-focusable scroll containers Opt Out

Is there a chromestatus entry associated with this intent? There's a lot of information missing from this Intent (see https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/LwgSKPBivuM/m/0dRsXWhBAgAJ as what is typical) - could you reply with the missing info? (Did you use ChromeStatus to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Tabbed web apps

LGTM2 On 5/9/24 10:48 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: Thanks for these clarifications. LGTM1 On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:05 PM Daniel Murphy wrote: We don't have an objection to this feature existing - it's actually currently in our backlog. But it is very low in our priority list.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience ads reporting - allow cross-origin subframes to send reportEvent() beacons

) don't have control over reportEvent() beacons since that is considered part of the overall Protected Audience API, and this feature doesn't change that. On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 1:27 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 5/8/24 11:30 AM, 'Liam Brady' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails lbr

[blink-dev] Re: “Trial for Disable Third-party Storage Partitioning” not working

21:46:30 UTC+1, Mike Taylor escribió: ** *Contact emails* * wande...@chromium.org, m...@chromium.org, mike...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/wanderview/quota-storage-partitioning/blob/main/explainer.md <https://github.com/wanderv

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience ads reporting - allow cross-origin subframes to send reportEvent() beacons

On 5/8/24 11:30 AM, 'Liam Brady' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails lbr...@google.com , shivani...@chromium.org , jkar...@chromium.org Explainer(s) https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1134

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture: propagate user activation

LGTM3 On 5/8/24 11:56 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM2 /Daniel On 2024-05-08 17:11, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 11:33:01 PM UTC+2 Tommy Steimel wrote: Contact emails stei...@chromium.org, liber...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSSPageRule to inherit from CSSGroupingRule

On 5/8/24 3:37 AM, Morten Stenshorne wrote: Interoperability and Compatibility Low risk. The one possible issue is if an author uses "instanceof CSSGroupingRule" or "instanceof CSSRule" with a page rule object and makes incorrect assumptions based on that. However, given that this

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API

LGTM to experiment from 126 to 127 inclusive. On 5/7/24 10:52 AM, Chris Fredrickson wrote: Contact emails johann...@chromium.org, cfred...@chromium.org, y...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/storage-access-for-fedcm

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Conversion to RGB in VideoFrame.copyTo()

etc in the chromestatus entry? Done On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 7:44 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Can you please request reviews for privacy, security, enterprise, etc in the chromestatus entry? On 4/25/24 6:19 PM, 'Eugene Zemtsov' via blink-dev wrote: Contact ema

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: View Transitions Same-Origin Navigation

LGTM3 On 5/1/24 11:47 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 8:46 AM Alex Russell wrote: LGTM1 On Tuesday, April 30, 2024 at 12:13:42 PM UTC-7 Khushal Sagar wrote: Contact emails bo...@google.com, khushalsa...@google.com,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Align navigator.cookieEnabled with spec

On 4/30/24 7:15 AM, Ari Chivukula wrote: Contact emails aric...@chromium.org , johann...@google.com Specification https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/system-state.html#cookies

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Conversion to RGB in VideoFrame.copyTo()

Can you please request reviews for privacy, security, enterprise, etc in the chromestatus entry? On 4/25/24 6:19 PM, 'Eugene Zemtsov' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails ezemt...@google.com Explainer https://gist.github.com/Djuffin/9e2f98025ead49998524510cfeed8d33

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature Bundle: Additional Verbose Debug Reports, Further Gating Source Verbose Debug Reports, Splitting the Attribution Rate Limit

d most likely be interested in also understanding any error signals that may be impacting their conversions as well. Thanks, Akash On Thursday, April 25, 2024 at 11:17:05 AM UTC-7 Mike Taylor wrote: Apologies for the delay here - it's a bit challenging to review 4 features at once

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Stable Bare Declarations (@nest)

On 4/25/24 7:09 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 6:14 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: Contact emails andr...@chromium.org Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-nesting-1/#nest-rule

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature Bundle: Additional Verbose Debug Reports, Further Gating Source Verbose Debug Reports, Splitting the Attribution Rate Limit

Apologies for the delay here - it's a bit challenging to review 4 features at once. (Aside: it seems like this particular intent could have been split into 2... one for 2 debug report features, and another for rate limits?) On 4/19/24 12:51 PM, 'Akash Nadan' via blink-dev wrote: Contact

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature Bundle: Additional Verbose Debug Reports, Further Gating Source Verbose Debug Reports, Splitting the Attribution Rate Limit

On 4/24/24 9:40 AM, Nan Lin wrote: These tests are for Attribution Reporting API, but not explicitly related to the features in this intent. We do expect that all the tests there will be passing. Those 3 tests involve writing to and reading from the stash, which probably causes the timeout

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support Cross-Origin Shared Storage Worklets

LGTM2. On 4/24/24 5:45 PM, Yao Xiao wrote: Hi Yao, I see that https://github.com/WICG/shared-storage/pull/152 is still open, can that be landed before we ship this? The PR landed just now. Also, can you point to the tests for this change? Yes.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM: Credentialed requests will no longer send SameSite=Strict cookies

LGTM3 On 4/24/24 9:38 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 9:29 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:46 PM Christian Biesinger wrote: Hi Yoav, with regards to the spec: As Johann suggests, this can't

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebGLObject Web IDL superinterface

LGTM2 On 4/23/24 1:18 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM1 On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:36 AM Ken Russell wrote: Yes. N/As and explanations have been requested for all of these now. On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 7:37 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: Can you request Privacy, Security,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support Cross-Origin Shared Storage Worklets

On 4/19/24 12:52 PM, Yao Xiao wrote: *Contact emails* cam...@chromium.org jkar...@chromium.org yao...@chromium.org rohitgu...@google.com ashame...@google.com *Explainer* https://github.com/WICG/shared-storage Would it be possible to write a paragraph on this specific change, i.e., what are

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: toJSON for GeolocationCoordinates and GeolocationPosition

LGTM2 - seems like a trivial, useful addition. On 4/16/24 2:02 PM, slightlyoff via Chromestatus wrote: LGTM1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Remove Authorization header upon cross-origin redirect

" do you mean backend? Or something else? Thanks On Tuesday 5 September 2023 at 18:29:10 UTC+3 Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM3 On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 8:27 AM Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 9/

Re: [blink-dev] FYI: Shared Storage API data storage limits updated

Have we done any compatibility analysis to understand if this change will affect sites using Shared Storage? On 4/15/24 3:49 PM, Cammie Smith Barnes wrote: FYI: Shared Storage API data storage limits updated We have updated the Shared Storage API data storage limits in the interest

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

lic Key Encryption (HPKE) in sending requests and responses. That said, we are thinking about ways to extend WPTs to make it possible to improve test coverage. On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 1:24 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Russ and I had a conversation offline about the progress here - mind

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Gamepad API Trigger-Rumble Extension

LGTM2 On 4/12/24 5:16 AM, 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev wrote: Updated the developer-facing gamepad article: https://web.dev/articles/gamepad#the_vibration_actuator. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

t started on WPT tests for this feature. On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:40 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Russ, Could you summarize progress on the following, per the extension process: Draft spec (early draft is ok, but must be spec-like and associated with the appropriate standardization v

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Declarative shadow DOM serialization

LGTM3 On 4/10/24 12:55 PM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM2 /Daniel On 2024-04-10 18:43, Alex Russell wrote: Ok, so Chris reminded me that we'd already shipped a setter via `setHTMLUnsafe()` and that Mozilla has an intent out for this new version of the getter, which suggests to me that we

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

Hi Russ, Could you summarize progress on the following, per the extension process: Draft spec (early draft is ok, but must be spec-like and associated with the appropriate standardization venue, or WICG) TAG review bit.ly/blink-signals requests Outreach for feedback from the spec community

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Stepped Value Functions

LGTM2 On 4/8/24 10:41 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: Can you please flip on the "debuggability" review bit in chromestatus? (feel free to mark it as "N/A" if you think that's the case) On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:40 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 Thanks for catching us up

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Split up large trusted signals fetches & deprectedReplaceInURN via auction config

LGTM1 On 4/3/24 11:05 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: Thanks, that clarifies a bit and calms my worries considerably. /Daniel On 2024-03-29 14:27, Paul Jensen wrote: Daniel, I hear your concerns, but I should clarify that this splitting up of large requests does not do any reassembly or

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement and Ship: OpusEncoderConfig `signal` and `application` parameters

LGTM1 On 4/4/24 2:29 PM, 'Thomas Guilbert' via blink-dev wrote: The last launch gate approval came in today. Thanks! On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 11:49 AM Thomas Guilbert wrote: I agree that this would have been a viable solution, and this was considered and discussed with the spec

Re: [blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Support "color-interpolation: linearrgb" on SVG gradients

On 4/4/24 4:29 AM, Fredrik Söderquist wrote: On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 1:22 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Fredrik, Just to confim - this is adding support for a new `color-interpolation` property value, yes (vs a bugfix or behavior change to an existing feature)? If so, can you send

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Removal of X-Requested-With in WebView

LGTM3 On 4/4/24 10:24 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 to continue the Deprecation Trial until M138. Thanks for pushing this through! It'd be great if by the time this trial expires we'd have a clearer picture of the required replacement mechanisms and some momentum for moving trial

Re: [blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Support "color-interpolation: linearrgb" on SVG gradients

Hi Fredrik, Just to confim - this is adding support for a new `color-interpolation` property value, yes (vs a bugfix or behavior change to an existing feature)? If so, can you send an Intent to Ship rather than a PSA? thanks, Mike On 4/3/24 10:15 AM, Fredrik Söderquist wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Foldable APIs (combo of Device Posture and Viewport Segments APIs)

One more thing, mind requesting reviews for Privacy, Security, Debuggability in your chromestatus entry? Thanks On 4/1/24 3:12 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks - sounds good. LGTM to experiment for 4 milestones (125 to 128 inclusive OR 126 to 129 inclusive). On 4/1/24 2:13 PM, Menard

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Foldable APIs (combo of Device Posture and Viewport Segments APIs)

have in mind. Thanks. *From:* Mike Taylor *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 1:53 PM *To:* Menard, Alexis ; blink-dev@chromium.org *Subject:* Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Foldable APIs (combo of Device Posture

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Foldable APIs (combo of Device Posture and Viewport Segments APIs)

How many milestones are you requesting for the OT (whether it starts in 125 or 126)? On 4/1/24 1:51 PM, Menard, Alexis wrote: Contact emails alexis.men...@intel.com Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: View Transitions: transition types

On 3/28/24 5:19 PM, Noam Rosenthal wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 9:07 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/28/24 5:04 PM, Noam Rosenthal wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 9:02 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hey Vlad - thanks for the update. Do we know if Mozilla is similarly

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: View Transitions: transition types

On 3/28/24 5:04 PM, Noam Rosenthal wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 9:02 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hey Vlad - thanks for the update. Do we know if Mozilla is similarly positive on this change? Any input from the WebKit team? Yes, this was thoroughly discussed in the CSSWG meetings

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: View Transitions: transition types

: LGTM3 On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 1:44 AM Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 11/22/23 11:15 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 7:05:57 PM UTC+1 Vladimir Levin wrote: On Thu

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RegExp modifiers

LGTM1 - looks like a useful addition already supported in a number of other RegExp engines. On 3/27/24 11:38 AM, 'Shu-yu Guo' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails s...@chromium.org, pth...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Split up large trusted signals fetches & deprectedReplaceInURN via auction config

On 3/25/24 12:44 PM, 'Paul Jensen' via blink-dev wrote: On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:02 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: If I understand correctly what y'all are trying to do here, you're trying to effectively recreate with GETs what should've been a POST. Is the reasoning for that outlined

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: visualViewport.onscrollend Support

LGTM2 On 3/26/24 10:50 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM1, this is a very small change that IMO does not require any signals or TAG review. It's just bringing this event in line with all other events on the platform. (It would be cool if there were some automated way of preventing this kind

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Allow top layer elements to be nested within popovers

LGTM2 On 3/26/24 10:53 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM1. I think there is a small compat risk here but it should be manageable via the combination of: low popover + dialog usage so far, presumably by actively-updated sites, and a Finch flag if something breaks really badly. On Wednesday,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Used color scheme root scrollbars

LGTM2 On 3/26/24 1:25 PM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 once the fix to the above issue lands. On Monday, March 18, 2024 at 7:56:52 PM UTC+1 yshal...@microsoft.com wrote: Yes, I believe the bug [1] is a blocker.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

LGTM2 On 3/26/24 1:27 PM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 On Monday, March 25, 2024 at 4:42:55 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: Thank you for the answers Etienne. Once the Testing bit has been requested, I'm happy to give an LGTM. On 3/25/24 11:08 AM, Etienne Pierre-doray wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature Bundle: Header Error Debug Reports, Preferred Platform field, Changing Source Deactivation

tps://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/attribution-reporting-api-dev> group as well. Thanks, Akash On Monday, March 25, 2024 at 7:45:42 AM UTC-7 Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks Akash. Follow up question: besides reading blink-dev, have we otherwise made relevant ad techs aware of the changes

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

tervention doesn't really make sense in modern day browsers, and neither blink or webkit are spec compliant (in distinct ways). On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 2:57 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/22/24 1:37 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 10:11 AM Zheda Chen wr

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature Bundle: Header Error Debug Reports, Preferred Platform field, Changing Source Deactivation

in comparison. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, Akash On Wednesday, March 20, 2024 at 8:30:31 AM UTC-7 Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/18/24 7:17 PM, 'Akash Nadan' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails akash...@google.com, lin...@chromium.org, john...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

On 3/22/24 1:37 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 10:11 AM Zheda Chen wrote: The privacy/security/enterprise/debuggability gates are requested on Chrome Status. Testing gate to be requested later. Thanks - we've been asked to not send LGTMs until all bits have

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: SVG context-fill and context-stroke

LGTM1 On 3/18/24 10:53 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks on both fronts, Stefan! On 3/15/24 8:37 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 6:29 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/14/24 6:29 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: On Thu, Mar 14, 2024, 3:13 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/14

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS view-transition-class and class VT argument syntax

LGTM1 On 3/20/24 2:27 PM, Vladimir Levin wrote: Contact emails vmp...@chromium.org, nrosent...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/vmpstr/web-proposals/blob/main/explainers/view-transition-classes.md Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Skip Preload Scanning

Could you also please request review for Privacy, Security, and Debuggability in your chromestatus entry? On 3/22/24 1:57 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/21/24 7:24 PM, Alex N. Jose wrote: > What milestones are you requesting for the Origin Trial? M125 to M131 Thanks - LGTM to experimen

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Skip Preload Scanning

On 3/21/24 7:24 PM, Alex N. Jose wrote: > What milestones are you requesting for the Origin Trial? M125 to M131 Thanks - LGTM to experiment 6 milestones from M125 to M130 inclusive (which I think is what you asked for!). On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:44 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi A

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Skip Preload Scanning

Hi Alex, What milestones are you requesting for the Origin Trial? thanks, Mike On 3/21/24 3:18 PM, Alex N. Jose wrote: Contact emails ale...@chromium.org Explainer https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wiaTL5TeONTZamycMVMjo76nMcbhHNYznQy7I_zCVRY/edit?usp=sharing

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: X25519Kyber768 key encapsulation for TLS on Desktop

LGTM2. Good luck! On 3/20/24 4:30 PM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 8:35 PM David Adrian wrote: > What's our plan to mitigate that risk? Slow rollout? Enterprise policy? Both? Something else entirely? We also worked with a variety of vendors to fix

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

You should be able to see all the various bits for approvals in your chromestatus entry now, can you fill them out please? There have been a few questions/comments about the lack of clarity of what "unimportant cross-origin frames" are. What exactly is the definition? You mention that Safari

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate the includeShadowRoots argument on DOMParser

On 3/19/24 6:51 PM, Mason Freed wrote: On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 1:44 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Mason, Would you mind requesting reviews for the various shipping gates (privacy, security, enterprise, etc.) in your chromestatus entry? Definitely! But I only need to do

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature Bundle: Header Error Debug Reports, Preferred Platform field, Changing Source Deactivation

On 3/18/24 7:17 PM, 'Akash Nadan' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails akashna...@google.com , lin...@chromium.org , johni...@chromium.org Explainer Attribution Reporting with event-level reports

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate the includeShadowRoots argument on DOMParser

Hi Mason, Would you mind requesting reviews for the various shipping gates (privacy, security, enterprise, etc.) in your chromestatus entry? On 3/15/24 6:49 PM, Mason Freed wrote: Contact emails mas...@chromium.org Explainer None

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: X25519Kyber768 key encapsulation for TLS on Desktop

Also, would you mind requesting reviews for the various shipping gates (privacy, security, enterprise, etc.) in your chromestatus entry? On 3/19/24 12:34 PM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 3:37 PM 'David Adrian' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

It would also be helpful to discuss what breakage looks like in this case. Would it be a one-time loss of state (i.e., have to log in again), or something different? On 3/19/24 5:08 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: OK, so just to summarize my understanding: * We expect this to have some

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: SVG context-fill and context-stroke

Thanks on both fronts, Stefan! On 3/15/24 8:37 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 6:29 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/14/24 6:29 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: On Thu, Mar 14, 2024, 3:13 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/14/24 1:17 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: /WebKit

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture: add option to hide back-to-tab button

Thank you! LGTM2 On 3/15/24 1:13 PM, Tommy Steimel wrote: Got it, thanks! Adding one in crrev.com/c/5375045 <http://crrev.com/c/5375045> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 7:51 AM Mike Taylor wrote: If a human can observe the expected behavior by clicking on a button and noticing th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture: add option to hide back-to-tab button

? On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 6:15 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Is there any reason to not convert https://steimelchrome.github.io/document-pip/hide-back-to-tab-button.html into a manual WPT <https://web-platform-tests.org/writing-tests/manual.html>? Manual tests aren't

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: SVG context-fill and context-stroke

On 3/14/24 6:29 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: On Thu, Mar 14, 2024, 3:13 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/14/24 1:17 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: Contact emails sza...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture: add option to hide back-to-tab button

Is there any reason to not convert https://steimelchrome.github.io/document-pip/hide-back-to-tab-button.html into a manual WPT ? Manual tests aren't ideal, but something seems better than nothing. On 3/14/24 9:42 PM, Domenic Denicola

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

The privacy and security teams review all intents, so requesting reviews and answering the relevant questionnaires is the best path forward. Looking forward to the new I2S - thanks! On 3/14/24 11:22 AM, Zheda Chen wrote: More details are updated in ChromeStatus, including interoperability and

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: SVG context-fill and context-stroke

On 3/14/24 1:17 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: Contact emails sza...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/painting.html#context-paint Summary Implements an existing SVG feature that allows the keywords 'context-fill' and

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: 'writingsuggestions' attribute

LGTM2 On 3/14/24 12:43 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: Awesome! LGTM1. On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 1:35 PM 'Stephanie Zhang' via blink-dev wrote: Thanks for clarifying! Updated the Chrome Status' "Finch Feature Name" field to kWritingSuggestions and removed the "Non-finch

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: WebAssembly JS String Builtins

they will be added before phase 3 >>as required by the proposal process. >> >> Let me know if you have any further questions! >> >> Best regards, >> Emanuel >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 3:52 PM Mike Taylor >> wrote: >> >&

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU: ServiceWorker and SharedWorker support

aufort' via blink-dev wrote: On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 6:58 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/11/24 4:06 PM, 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >