Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to experiment - WebAssembly JavaScript Promise Integration (update)

The policy has changed a bit to accept a direct extension, without any breaks, where we previously didn't so it's possible the documentation you saw was outdated. The enforced break was to prevent burn-in that would make it painful to do suitable changes or drop an idea, but it seems that has

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to experiment - WebAssembly JavaScript Promise Integration (update)

I can live with that. However, the bureaucracy is overwhelming. To get an extension, the documentation I saw stated that I have to create a new OT. On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 10:02:44 AM UTC-8 rby...@chromium.org wrote: > Sorry I missed this question! No, I did not notice that the entry

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to experiment - WebAssembly JavaScript Promise Integration (update)

Sorry I missed this question! No, I did not notice that the entry was for 10 milestones. Our policy is a maximum of 6 milestones

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to experiment - WebAssembly JavaScript Promise Integration (update)

Hey Rick, This intent was updated to last between M123-M132 after posting, but before approval. Since it's not clear whether you looked at Chromestatus or the email thread, can you confirm that your approval is indeed for these milestones? Thanks, Panos On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:29 AM Mike

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to experiment - WebAssembly JavaScript Promise Integration (update)

Yep - that is an official positive signal, thanks! On 1/24/24 7:40 PM, Francis McCabe wrote: Does this: https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/#wasm-js-promise-integration count as an official positive signal? Francis On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 3:09 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote:

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to experiment - WebAssembly JavaScript Promise Integration (update)

Does this: https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/#wasm-js-promise-integration count as an official positive signal? Francis On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 3:09 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > On Friday, January 5, 2024 at 7:25:28 PM UTC+1 Francis McCabe wrote: >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to experiment - WebAssembly JavaScript Promise Integration (update)

My only OT-blocking concern in the original thread was the "developers: no signals". But that was answered there . Yoav, I think your questions are not OT-blocking, right? LGTM to

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to experiment - WebAssembly JavaScript Promise Integration (update)

On Friday, January 5, 2024 at 7:25:28 PM UTC+1 Francis McCabe wrote: This is an update to the previous intent-to-experiment (filled out a few more fields) Contact emails...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/WebAssembly/js-promise-integration/blob/main/