On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Andrew Dalke da...@dalkescientific.com wrote:
On Jul 31, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote:
some legal framework kicks in to overcome this problem...
I'm pretty sure it works something like that with
copyright on books too... not?
Not.
Orphan works -
On 30 July 2010 19:51, Geoffrey Hutchison geo...@pitt.edu wrote:
even if all the code was rewritten, the code ownership would not change
at least if the changes are incremental. If this is true, you might be
unable to relicense OpenBabel without permission from OpenEye even if
all the original
What's the meaning of less restrictive license? It's the GPLv2.
It's not compatible with GPLv3, but then GPLv3 isn't compatible
with GPLv2, so why not call them both restrictive?
Both of them are restrictive without doubt
--
Regards,
Konstantin
On Jul 31, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote:
some legal framework kicks in to overcome this problem...
I'm pretty sure it works something like that with
copyright on books too... not?
Not.
Orphan works - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orphan_works
See also abandonware -
I am forwarding the following open request from OpenEye through the
InChI-discuss list. Now that gthe details are clear I would be grateful if
the critical aspects could be re-reviewed.
There is an issue for me and a co-author and I'd like to know
authoritatively what the implications of
On 7/30/10 9:48 AM, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
I am forwarding the following open request from OpenEye through the
InChI-discuss list. Now that gthe details are clear I would be grateful
if the critical aspects could be re-reviewed.
There is an issue for me and a co-author and I'd like to know
Le vendredi 30 juillet 2010 à 10:16 -0700, Craig James a écrit :
On 7/30/10 9:48 AM, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
I am forwarding the following open request from OpenEye through the
InChI-discuss list. Now that gthe details are clear I would be grateful
if the critical aspects could be
even if all the code was rewritten, the code ownership would not change
at least if the changes are incremental. If this is true, you might be
unable to relicense OpenBabel without permission from OpenEye even if
all the original code is rewritten.
Actually, what Craig is referencing (I
