Re: [board-discuss] Re: New draft of the proposal for in-house developers

2022-03-24 Thread Michael Weghorn
On 25/03/2022 06.50, Michael Weghorn wrote: I've seen Julien doing some work there recently. Maybe he, Lionel or anybody else might be able to say more on whether it would make sense to consider that as a potential area to be worked on by TDF in-house developers. [Something went wrong when

[board-discuss] Re: New draft of the proposal for in-house developers

2022-03-24 Thread Michael Weghorn
Hi Paolo, thanks for the updated draft and integrating my references to meta bugs. Another potential focus area might be Base (the database module). Alex mentioned it in another thread (that had a different main focus) [1] and I've heard from time to time that it isn't in the best shape.

Re: [board-discuss] [VOTE] Approve the attic proposal

2022-03-24 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Andreas, all, Andreas Mantke wrote: > Am 24.03.22 um 00:20 schrieb Thorsten Behrens: > > • Any repositories inside it will be made “read only”, so no “push” or > >“pull request” mechanisms will be available: this allows changes to > >the code to be shared as it was the last time it was

Re: [board-discuss] [VOTE] Approve the attic proposal

2022-03-24 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi, Thorsten Behrens wrote on 24/03/2022 00:20: calling for an email VOTE on the below final version of the Attic Proposal. The vote runs for 72 hours, starting now. Thanks to all involved in the discussion .. and +1 from me, Cor -- Cor Nouws, member Board of Directors The Document

Re: [board-discuss] [VOTE] Approve the attic proposal

2022-03-24 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Andreas, Andreas Mantke píše v Čt 24. 03. 2022 v 21:24 +0100: > > • Any repositories inside it will be made “read only”, so no “push” > > or > >“pull request” mechanisms will be available: this allows changes > > to > >the code to be shared as it was the last time it was > >

Re: [board-discuss] [VOTE] Approve the attic proposal

2022-03-24 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Jan Holesovsky píše v Čt 24. 03. 2022 v 20:07 +0100: > > calling for an email VOTE on the below final version of the Attic > > Proposal. The vote runs for 72 hours, starting now. > > Thank you for this effort, +1 from me. Oops, meant to +1 from this email address :-) [Sorry about that, I've

Re: [board-discuss] [VOTE] Approve the attic proposal

2022-03-24 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi all, Am 24.03.22 um 00:20 schrieb Thorsten Behrens: (...) • Any repositories inside it will be made “read only”, so no “push” or “pull request” mechanisms will be available: this allows changes to the code to be shared as it was the last time it was “atticisized”; I'm curious why

Re: [board-discuss] [VOTE] Approve the attic proposal

2022-03-24 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Thorsten & Emiliano, all, Thorsten Behrens píše v Čt 24. 03. 2022 v 00:20 +0100: > calling for an email VOTE on the below final version of the Attic > Proposal. The vote runs for 72 hours, starting now. Thank you for this effort, +1 from me. All the best, Kendy -- To unsubscribe e-mail

Re: [board-discuss] [VOTE] Approve the attic proposal

2022-03-24 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 00:20 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Dear directors, > > calling for an email VOTE on the below final version of the Attic > Proposal. The vote runs for 72 hours, starting now. +1 in favor. -- Caolán McNamara, Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation,

Re: [board-discuss] [VOTE] Approve the attic proposal

2022-03-24 Thread Thorsten Behrens
I vote +1. I wrote: > Dear directors, > > calling for an email VOTE on the below final version of the Attic > Proposal. The vote runs for 72 hours, starting now. > > Changes since v2.1: > * corrected mistakes found during Monday board call > * light touch-ups for English > * aligned the readme