[boost] Re: 1.30.0-1.30.2: no more thread support for Linux?

2003-08-29 Thread Steve Hutton
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Maddock wrote: Any thoughts on more explicitly documenting the #defines used to toggle optional features in header-only boost modules? What where you thinking of other than that already in www.boost.org/libs/config/config.htm I was thinking of a view from

[boost] Re: 1.30.0-1.30.2: no more thread support for Linux?

2003-08-27 Thread Steve Hutton
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Abrahams wrote: Neal D. Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Saturday 23 August 2003 07:18 am, John Maddock wrote: One more thing: what exactly can go wrong with 1.30.0 if -pthread isn't used? Is it boost specific or a general thing (e.g. issues w/

[boost] Re: UI++ [was: GUI sublanguage; Re: Re: Re: Re: GUI/GDI template library]

2003-08-08 Thread Steve Hutton
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brock Peabody wrote: I suggest taking maybe some classes of WxWindows or Qt for basic portable [x1, y1, x2, y2] paint devices. This would be a beginning. I'm sure we could learn something at least. Note: Qt is GPL, WxWindows is (modified) LGPL. Obviously,

[boost] database library?

2003-01-20 Thread Steve Hutton
I don't recall discussion of a rdbms access library on this list. Have there been any candidates in the past? Oracle OCCI seems pretty modern and might make a good starting point - http://www.csis.gvsu.edu/GeneralInfo/Oracle/appdev.920/a96583/toc.htm Steve