At 07:15 AM 5/30/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
IMO it's worth to step back and try to answer a couple of big picture
questions:
Yes, that's a good idea.
1) What are the target audiences for the regression test results?
2) What kind of information these audiences are looking to find in
there?
Beman Dawes wrote:
One possible short-term fix might be to run the MPL tests separately,
and post them as a separate table.
That's what we plan to do, although format of the table probably going
to be different - please see below.
Long term, some kind of hierarchical approach might help with
I apologize if this has already been asked, but why aren't the libs/mpl/test
sources included in regresssion testing? I know some tests are missing and
some are perhaps as robust as they might be, but it seems some testing is
better than no testing.
I'd like to write an appropriate jamfile and
At 03:29 PM 5/28/2003, Eric Friedman wrote:
I apologize if this has already been asked, but why aren't the
libs/mpl/test
sources included in regresssion testing? I know some tests are missing
and
some are perhaps as robust as they might be, but it seems some testing is
better than no testing.
Eric Friedman wrote:
I apologize if this has already been asked, but why aren't the
libs/mpl/test sources included in regresssion testing? I know some
tests are missing and some are perhaps as robust as they might be,
but it seems some testing is better than no testing.
Definitely, and
At 08:19 PM 5/28/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Eric Friedman wrote:
I apologize if this has already been asked, but why aren't the
libs/mpl/test sources included in regresssion testing? I know some
tests are missing and some are perhaps as robust as they might be,
but it seems some testing is
