> I believe the clear_table() function still exists in zeek, as well...
Hah^2! Yeah, it does. Well, glad I consulted the list before diving into
some hacking :-P.
Vern
___
bro-dev mailing list
bro-dev@bro.org
I believe the clear_table() function still exists in zeek, as well...
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:12 PM Vern Paxson wrote:
> > I guess re-assigning a new, empty table to the variable could be
> > analogous to deleting all entries and also avoids the iterator
> > invalidation problem ?
>
> Hah!,
> I guess re-assigning a new, empty table to the variable could be
> analogous to deleting all entries and also avoids the iterator
> invalidation problem ?
Hah!, yeah, that's certainly a simple way to do it. Maybe I'll
change my hacking for now to just be adding this observation to
the "delete"
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:09 PM Vern Paxson wrote:
> This means I have to first build up a *separate* vector of all the indexes,
> then iterate over that to remove them.
I guess re-assigning a new, empty table to the variable could be
analogous to deleting all entries and also avoids the
I'm working on some scripts where I want to remove every element from a
table in a single shot. In awk, "delete tbl" would do the trick, but Zeek
restricts delete operations to removing single elements. Worse, if I try
iterating over an aggregate to remove elements piece-wise, it doesn't
remove
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:16 AM Hosom, Stephen M wrote:
> I have looked at the implementations of publish_hrw and publish_rr in bro. I
> could easily implement those features in my application if that is the
> recommended way to handle this issue.
There's been some ideas on pushing loading
FYI - there now also is a topic/johanna/static branch in the base
repository, which adds a --enable-static-broker flag that automatically
builds/links static broker/caf against Bro.
Pull request in https://github.com/zeek/zeek/pull/224.
Johanna
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:25:50AM -0800, Johanna
In case it is helpful, here is the script I used to build all static bro
(without any shared libraries)
```
cd bro
mkdir buildcaf
cd buildcaf
cmake -DCAF_NO_UNIT_TESTS=1 -DCAF_NO_EXAMPLES=1 -DCAF_BUILD_STATIC_ONLY=1
../aux/broker/3rdparty/caf/
make
make install || true
cd ..
mkdir build
cd
Hi Craig,
I pushed another commit to the branch that passes --build-static-only through
to CAF; if you just want the patch for that it is available at
https://github.com/zeek/broker/commit/bf03a4246113c72d10530cc0c2729a3fa6f0b046.
(Note that repositories are currently being migrated; if you pull
I've been working on an application that will fire a large volume of events
into bro through broker. Basically, I want to fire events into Broker and load
balance them across a pool of workers without the need for more than one worker
to handle the same event.
I'm having difficulty
Hi Craig,
I actually recently started working on this, however I am did not quite
look at what you want.
There already is a branch called topic/johanna/static, which now makes
--build-static(-only) work for broker whan CAF is built statically - it
does not yet pass the static flags through to
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 19:03 -0800, Craig Leres wrote:
> (I'm working on updating the FreeBSD port to 2.6 and can't install
> things like libcaf_io.so in /usr/local/lib because they conflict with
> libraries potentially installed by the devel/caf port.)
What's the version of the CAF port?
Johanna has been working on this recently. We may end up needing to do
a minor release update just to fix this because it appears that it's
going to be a bit of a packaging problem on a number of OSs and distros
otherwise.
.Seth
On 5 Dec 2018, at 22:03, Craig Leres wrote:
> I've read up
13 matches
Mail list logo