Re: [Bro-Dev] How to deal with stale branches?

Personally I don't really mind such branches sticking around for reference purposes. We have plenty stale branches anyways all over, it would probably be more to clean up those (looking at myself there, too :) Robin On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:01 +, you wrote: > Yeah, that's certainly one

Re: [Bro-Dev] How to deal with stale branches?

Yeah, that's certainly one option, but I think it'd be hard for people to find. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Jon Siwek wrote: > > > On 4/26/18 11:06 AM, Vlad Grigorescu wrote: > > I'm torn between deleting the branches, in an effort to not clog up git >> with unneeded

Re: [Bro-Dev] How to deal with stale branches?

On 4/26/18 11:06 AM, Vlad Grigorescu wrote: > I'm torn between deleting the branches, in an effort to not clog up git > with unneeded branches, and leaving them around or perhaps archiving > them somewhere, in order to not completely lose the work in case it's of > value to someone down the

[Bro-Dev] How to deal with stale branches?

I have a couple of branches that, for whatever reason, aren't headed for a merge request into master. The branches were left around for reference, in case someone wanted to pick up and continue the work. However, this too now looks very unlikely, as some of these are several years old, and of