2023年2月7日(火) 0:59 Koichi Murase :
> By the way, I got a reply from the chair, Andrew, yesterday and could
> get my account in the Austing Group Issue Tracker. I'll later submit
> an issue about the implementation extension of function names with
> slashes.
Sorry for the delay about an issue in
2023年2月16日(木) 0:03 Tobias Powalowski via Bug reports for the GNU
Bourne Again SHell :
> Description:
> latest 5.2.x seems to have introduced a change in shopt extglob:
> https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/devtools/-/merge_requests/133
> I'm not sure if my proposed fix for this is correct or if
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 23:29, Tobias Powalowski via Bug reports for the GNU
Bourne Again SHell wrote:
> Hi,
> latest 5.2.x seems to have introduced a change in shopt extglob:
> https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/devtools/-/merge_requests/133
> I'm not sure if my proposed fix for this is
> On 2 Feb 2023, at 05:46, Sam James wrote:
>
> dup2 requires a include. Fixes the following when diffing
> config.log
> when testing with a stricter compiler:
> ```
> -warning: call to undeclared function 'dup2'; ISO C99 and later do not
> support implicit function declarations
Date:Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:57:45 -0500
From:Chet Ramey
Message-ID: <8295e33a-da67-676c-66cb-9593871ce...@case.edu>
| However, it might be time to change this again, since the ultimate
| resolution of issue 654 resulted in POSIX removing the special handling of
|
On 2/15/23 2:35 PM, Eduardo A. Bustamante López wrote:
Signed-off-by: Eduardo A. Bustamante López
Thanks for the report.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRUc...@case.edu
Signed-off-by: Eduardo A. Bustamante López
---
lib/readline/tcap.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/readline/tcap.h b/lib/readline/tcap.h
index 1121061b..a9c6322a 100644
--- a/lib/readline/tcap.h
+++ b/lib/readline/tcap.h
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ extern int
On 2/13/23 10:33 AM, Voldemar Lazarev via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne
Again SHell wrote:
Bash Version: 5.2
Patch Level: 15
Release Status: release
Description:
When a function has a variable (e.g. "X") defined as local and read-only ("local -r") and the
function is called with
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 05:35:10PM +0100, Mike Jonkmans wrote:
> I once had that same issue:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2015-10/msg00013.html
>
> Conclusion: the shopt is not yet working until the function has been run.
> (or after the line has been parsed).
Yes. This is not
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023, 5:36 PM Mike Jonkmans wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:29:29PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski via Bug
> reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell wrote:
>
> I once had that same issue:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2015-10/msg00013.html
>
> Conclusion: the shopt
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:29:29PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski via Bug reports for
the GNU Bourne Again SHell wrote:
I once had that same issue:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2015-10/msg00013.html
Conclusion: the shopt is not yet working until the function has been run.
(or after the
On 2/14/23 7:09 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
I still don't think `builtin jobs' is equivalent
to `jobs' because `jobs' can pick up a shell function.
You're right; they're not equivalent. `builtin' guarantees you'll execute
the builtin instead of any function replacement. I wish POSIX had picked
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fno-plt
-fexceptions -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat
-Werror=format-security -fstack-clash-protection
13 matches
Mail list logo
