On 7/3/23 5:56 PM, alex xmb ratchev wrote:
looked into non finite number libs ?
gawk like .. ?
bignums? No. intmax_t is enough for the shell.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023, 23:25 Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 6/30/23 3:09 PM, Emanuele Torre wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:16:46PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> >>> What I would have expected was something like this:
> >>>
> >>> $ x=([9223372036854775805]=foo)
> >>> $ x+=( {1..5} ); echo "this
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023, 18:22 Dennis Williamson
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 11:11 AM alex xmb ratchev
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> thats a like 30% or smth
>> enuff for me
>> i d be the fool typing nonsensly ; s
>>
>
> Do what you like, but percentages don't mean anything unless you're
> running
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:24:49PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> It's really more like
>
> a=(); a[0]=1 a[1]=2 a[2]=3
>
> and the += variant omits the initial array flush.
Oh, yes. I knew it, but I forgot to mention it.
> > I would have expected:
> >
> >$ a=([1]=hi [100]=foo [-1002]=bar boo
On 7/2/23 9:17 AM, Sam James wrote:
The dynamic loader has to know where the library is. If you don't call
readline, it shouldn't ever have to actually map it into the process.
I think it still has to map it even with lazy binding, but I'm not
really worried about this point much.
I was
On 6/30/23 3:09 PM, Emanuele Torre wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:16:46PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
What I would have expected was something like this:
$ x=([9223372036854775805]=foo)
$ x+=( {1..5} ); echo "this won't run"
bash: some "invalid assignment" error
$ declare -p x
>
> This is known as dynamic scoping. There is text in the manual describing
> it.
>
Thank you, this was an interesting read. :)
Best,
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 2:59 PM Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 7/2/23 9:04 AM, Top Dawn wrote:
> >>
> >> What makes you think so? Variables are always visible in
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 11:11 AM alex xmb ratchev wrote:
>
>
>
> thats a like 30% or smth
> enuff for me
> i d be the fool typing nonsensly ; s
>
Do what you like, but percentages don't mean anything unless you're running
a lot of assignments in a loop like the artificial conditions in the test
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023, 18:01 Dennis Williamson
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 10:32 AM alex xmb ratchev
> wrote:
>
>>
>> i chain assignments , have impression its faster
>>
>> kre
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
> Tests are better than impressions. Sometimes they match though.
>
> $ time for ((i = 0; i
On 7/3/23 2:33 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
This is a Gentoo-specific problem. When we are bootstrapping a Prefix,
we need an updated bash very early on in the process. On some systems,
we experienced compilation failures in the readline component. Since
this interactive part isn't important at
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 10:32 AM alex xmb ratchev wrote:
>
> i chain assignments , have impression its faster
>
> kre
> >
> >
> >
>
Tests are better than impressions. Sometimes they match though.
$ time for ((i = 0; i <= 100; i++)); do j=$i; k=$j; m=10;
n=foobarbazqux; p=100; q=$n;
On 6/30/23 2:06 AM, Grisha Levit wrote:
The sleep builtin currently doesn't do much in the way of signal
management, so for example it will return on SIGWINCH, which I think most
users will be particularly surprised by the first time they notice a sleep
ending early due to a window resize.
I
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023, 14:41 Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2023 21:04:38 -0400
> From:Greg Wooledge
> Message-ID:
>
> | The first assignment is done before the value of "m" is used in the
> second
> | assignment.
>
> Note that that is a shell specific
On 7/2/23 9:04 AM, Top Dawn wrote:
What makes you think so? Variables are always visible in invoked
functions, unless you shadow them using local/declare/typeset.
Thank you very much for this information, I didn't know invoked functions
inherited their parent functions variables.
This is
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2023 21:04:38 -0400
From:Greg Wooledge
Message-ID:
| The first assignment is done before the value of "m" is used in the second
| assignment.
Note that that is a shell specific feature, applies to bash, but
not necessarily to other shells (some
On 02-07-2023 14:17:28 +0100, Sam James wrote:
>
> Chet Ramey writes:
>
> > On 6/29/23 11:16 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> >
> >> I assume that, given the option exists in the configure script, there
> >> are people who will want to use the option made available to them. One
> >> reason might be
16 matches
Mail list logo
