On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, 22:20 Kerin Millar wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 22:08:25 +0200
> alex xmb ratchev wrote:
>
> > so u mean a $ sign requirement ?
>
> For dereferencing variable identifiers in base#n notation, yes.
>
> > i didnt get the base values , i tried simple one
> > i faced the '
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 22:08:25 +0200
alex xmb ratchev wrote:
> so u mean a $ sign requirement ?
For dereferencing variable identifiers in base#n notation, yes.
> i didnt get the base values , i tried simple one
> i faced the ' without $ it doesnt work '
I don't fully understand this sentence.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, 22:08 alex xmb ratchev wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, 21:54 Kerin Millar wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 21:29:32 +0200
>> alex xmb ratchev wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, 21:14 Kerin Millar wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 01:41:30 +0700
>> > > Robert Elz
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, 21:54 Kerin Millar wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 21:29:32 +0200
> alex xmb ratchev wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, 21:14 Kerin Millar wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 01:41:30 +0700
> > > Robert Elz wrote:
> > >
> > > > Date:Tue, 19 Sep 2023 18:09:13
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 21:29:32 +0200
alex xmb ratchev wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, 21:14 Kerin Millar wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 01:41:30 +0700
> > Robert Elz wrote:
> >
> > > Date:Tue, 19 Sep 2023 18:09:13 +0100
> > > From:Kerin Millar
> > > Message-ID:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, 21:14 Kerin Millar wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 01:41:30 +0700
> Robert Elz wrote:
>
> > Date:Tue, 19 Sep 2023 18:09:13 +0100
> > From:Kerin Millar
> > Message-ID: <20230919180913.bd90c16b908ab7966888f...@plushkava.net>
> >
> > | > | On
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 01:41:30 +0700
Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Tue, 19 Sep 2023 18:09:13 +0100
> From:Kerin Millar
> Message-ID: <20230919180913.bd90c16b908ab7966888f...@plushkava.net>
>
> | > | On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, at 8:40 AM, Victor Pasko wrote:
> | > | > in
Date:Tue, 19 Sep 2023 18:09:13 +0100
From:Kerin Millar
Message-ID: <20230919180913.bd90c16b908ab7966888f...@plushkava.net>
| > | On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, at 8:40 AM, Victor Pasko wrote:
| > | > in let "<>" and $((<>)) constructs all variables should be
| > |
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 20:00:13 +0700
Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Tue, 19 Sep 2023 09:52:21 +0100
> From:"Kerin Millar"
> Message-ID: <4c2e3d39-0392-41ae-b73c-3e17296a9...@app.fastmail.com>
>
> | On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, at 8:40 AM, Victor Pasko wrote:
> | > Thanks for
On 9/19/23 3:40 AM, Victor Pasko wrote:
Thanks for your response.
In my opinion, in let "<>" and $((<>)) constructs all variables should be
evaluated, so that $-sign for them is to be just optional
They are, in places where identifiers are valid. In fact, variable values
are treated as
Date:Tue, 19 Sep 2023 09:52:21 +0100
From:"Kerin Millar"
Message-ID: <4c2e3d39-0392-41ae-b73c-3e17296a9...@app.fastmail.com>
| On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, at 8:40 AM, Victor Pasko wrote:
| > Thanks for your response.
| > In my opinion, in let "<>" and $((<>))
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, at 8:40 AM, Victor Pasko wrote:
> Thanks for your response.
> In my opinion, in let "<>" and $((<>)) constructs all variables should be
> evaluated, so that $-sign for them is to be just optional
You haven't thought this through. It would amount to an egregious break of
Thanks for your response.
In my opinion, in let "<>" and $((<>)) constructs all variables should be
evaluated, so that $-sign for them is to be just optional
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 2:28 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 9/17/23 3:59 PM, Victor Pasko wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could you please take a look
13 matches
Mail list logo
