On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 2:45 PM Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> On 4/8/24 11:44 PM, Zachary Santer wrote:
>
> > The fact that the current implementation allows the coproc fds to get
> > into process substitutions is a little weird to me. A process
> > substitution, in combination with exec, is kind of the
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 12:41 AM Cedric Blancher
wrote:
>
> Good morning!
>
> Building bash HEAD on Cygwin 3.5.3 and Debian Linux 11 in make
> parallel mode issues a warning, which looks like a Makefile bug:
> $ make -h 16
> ...
> make[1]: warning: -j16 forced in submake: resetting jobserver
Date:Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:10:26 -0400
From:Chet Ramey
Message-ID: <32bd9e76-24bc-4206-aa8a-8bcc81722...@case.edu>
| File descriptors the user saves with exec redirections beyond [0-2]
| are set to close-on-exec. POSIX makes that behavior unspecified, but
| bash
On 4/11/24 11:51 AM, Robert Elz wrote:
For how aliases can mess things up, with the bash way of parsing
command substitutions, if we do:
foo() { echo hello; X=$(echo goodbye); echo "$X"; }
and just run foo then we get "hello", "goodbye" (on successive lines).
Let's assume that this
On 4/9/24 11:58 AM, Carl Edquist wrote:
On 4/4/24 7:23 PM, Martin D Kealey wrote:
I'm somewhat uneasy about having coprocs inaccessible to each other. I
can foresee reasonable cases where I'd want a coproc to utilize one or
more other coprocs.
In particular, I can see cases where a coproc
On 4/9/24 10:46 AM, Zachary Santer wrote:
If you want two processes to communicate (really three), you might want
to build with the multiple coproc support and use the shell as the
arbiter.
If you've written a script for other people than just yourself,
expecting all of them to build their
On 4/8/24 11:44 PM, Zachary Santer wrote:
The fact that the current implementation allows the coproc fds to get
into process substitutions is a little weird to me. A process
substitution, in combination with exec, is kind of the one other way
to communicate with background processes through fds
On 4/10/24 8:51 PM, nbow...@draconx.ca wrote:
Bash Version: 5.2
Patch Level: 21
Release Status: release
Description:
The POSIX shell grammar specifies that a newline may optionally appear
before the in keyword of a for loop.
[...]
However, if the exact same loop is placed within
On 4/13/24 12:40 AM, Cedric Blancher wrote:
Good morning!
Building bash HEAD on Cygwin 3.5.3 and Debian Linux 11 in make
parallel mode issues a warning, which looks like a Makefile bug:
$ make -h 16
...
make[1]: warning: -j16 forced in submake: resetting jobserver mode.
...
Can this be fixed
