Re: RFR: 8278885: Remove Windows ARM64 int8_t workaround in G1

2022-01-17 Thread Martijn Verburg
On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 23:44:55 GMT, aamarsh wrote: > Please review this small change to revert a previous workaround that avoided > an MSVC issue. > > This issue has now been fixed in VS 16.8 and higher. > > I also updated some documentation to reflect this change. > /sponser I think it's

Re: Building OpenJDK 1.8 on Solaris SPARC 10 fails with compiler error

2019-05-24 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi Matthias, We're building Solaris builds from the same source over at https://adoptopenjdk.net - feel free to use those binaries ( https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html#sparcv9_solaris) and/or our build scripts (github.com/adoptopenjdk/openjdk-build). When there are genuine upstream fixes to

Re: RFC: JEP JDK-8208089: Implement C++14 Language Features

2018-10-04 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi Kim, I like this initiative. I'm wondering if some of these rules can be easily codified or written into a jcheck style checker (ccheck?) so that Authors can adhere to the conventions and not rely on a Human review to pick out where that convention isn't met. Cheers, Martijn On Wed, 3 Oct

Re: Syntax error with set-vs-env.sh: - building jdk8u on Windows (cygwin)

2018-09-19 Thread Martijn Verburg
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 09:00, Magnus Ihse Bursie < magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 2018-09-17 14:13, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Hi Erik, > > > > Thanks for the info, inside that shell script we noticed the > concatenation > > of PATH with whatever the hos

Re: Syntax error with set-vs-env.sh: - building jdk8u on Windows (cygwin)

2018-09-17 Thread Martijn Verburg
at 18:11, Erik Joelsson wrote: > That code was rather recently touched in 8u when backporting support for > devkits and newer versions of Visual Studio. What is the contents of the > generated set-vs-env.sh? > > /Erik > > > On 2018-09-14 05:29, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >

Syntax error with set-vs-env.sh: - building jdk8u on Windows (cygwin)

2018-09-14 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, AdoptOpenJDK recently started seeing this error (full configure details below the horizontal), has anyone else experienced this: configure: Setting extracted environment variables

Re: RFR: JDK-8200132: Remove jre images and bundles

2018-06-05 Thread Martijn Verburg
Thanks Erik, We do have quite a few requests to build that jRE for AdoptOpenJDK binaries, and this should let us continue doing that. Cheers, Martijn On 5 June 2018 at 09:41, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 04/06/2018 22:22, Erik Joelsson wrote: > >> Given the feedback, I have revised the patch to

Re: Supported platforms

2018-04-10 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, Apologies for being late to the thread. We're looking to provide a central place for OpenJDK binaries to be produced and have some level of community support for the more esoteric platforms. Perhaps this is a place where you can get some extra assistance in keeping a particular port

Re: RFR 8190378: Java EE and CORBA modules removal

2018-02-12 Thread Martijn Verburg
One could almost shed a tear - of joy! This is exactly the use case for the module system that the developer community at large will understand. Thanks for this change and a leaner meaner JDK. Cheers, Martijn On 8 February 2018 at 13:37, Lance Andersen wrote: > > >

Re: Correct Compiler for ARM / Arch64 for the jdk8u forest? (-m64 not supported)

2017-04-20 Thread Martijn Verburg
, > dalibor topic > > [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2017-April/ > 018974.html > > > On 20.04.2017 13:16, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We've been putting together a community build farm and have wrangled from >> ARM machines. We are buildi

Correct Compiler for ARM / Arch64 for the jdk8u forest? (-m64 not supported)

2017-04-20 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, We've been putting together a community build farm and have wrangled from ARM machines. We are building from jdk8u and have the following configuration: - A new configuration has been successfully created in

Re: Building latest jdk9 dev on Mac OS X 10.12.1 - Undefined symbols (_libiconv) causing build to fail?

2016-12-16 Thread Martijn Verburg
sable-warnings-as-errors > > > > > > make images > > > > > Thanks, > Michel > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil Race wrote: > > > A complete stab in the dark, but did you install the xcode > > command line > > too

Re: Building latest jdk9 dev on Mac OS X 10.12.1 - Undefined symbols (_libiconv) causing build to fail?

2016-12-16 Thread Martijn Verburg
the dark, but did you install the xcode command line > > tools ? > > > > -phil. > > > > On 12/15/2016 07:24 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > > Hi Erik, > > > > > > Thanks, that's fine. As an FYI I swapped to using gcc and g++ compilers > but &g

Re: Building latest jdk9 dev on Mac OS X 10.12.1 - Undefined symbols (_libiconv) causing build to fail?

2016-12-15 Thread Martijn Verburg
he build team are > able to actively pursue. > > /Erik > > > > On 2016-12-15 10:29, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've updated my toolchain slightly and am now on XCode 8.2, Mac OS X >> 10.12.2: >> >> ==

Re: Building latest jdk9 dev on Mac OS X 10.12.1 - Undefined symbols (_libiconv) causing build to fail?

2016-12-15 Thread Martijn Verburg
16384 MB The same build error as reported below still occurs. Is it the case that clang at this version is not yet supported? Cheers, Martijn On 8 December 2016 at 20:38, Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > &g

Building latest jdk9 dev on Mac OS X 10.12.1 - Undefined symbols (_libiconv) causing build to fail?

2016-12-08 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, I got past my previous issue (thanks Dmitry!), but I now have a new one (after a fresh clone). I notice I'm using the clang compiler by default, not sure if that's supported. - ld: warning: object file

Re: Compile error with jdk9-dev latest HEAD - missing com.sun.tools.jdi - on Mac OS X 10.12.1

2016-12-08 Thread Martijn Verburg
com> wrote: > Martijn, > > Could I ask you to clone fresh sources? > > SA-JDI classes was removed in Aug see - JDK-8158050 > > -Dmitry > > On 2016-12-06 16:44, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Just ran make clean image this morning and got: >

Re: A couple of Build Issues (Mac OS X El Capitan / XCode 7.1)

2015-10-25 Thread Martijn Verburg
Nevermind, I wasn't building from the dev forest! Cheers, Martijn On 24 October 2015 at 15:58, Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm seeing a couple of issues when running make clean images > (Configuration Summary is posted at the bottom): >

A couple of Build Issues (Mac OS X El Capitan / XCode 7.1)

2015-10-24 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, I'm seeing a couple of issues when running make clean images (Configuration Summary is posted at the bottom): 1.) No rule to make CopyInterimCLDRConverter.gmk - this doesn't halt the build immediately, but looks suspicious. .. Compiling 5 files for BUILD_GENMODULESLIST make[3]:

Mac OS X - error: out-of-line definition of 'getenv' does not match any declaration in 'os' in os_bsd.cpp

2015-06-17 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, Building jdk9 on latest Mac OS X, XCode/Clang etc. Not sure if the Mac OS X build still needs to rely on BSD as such I'll dig further but figured it was worth reporting the initial error. --- Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.

Error: SPEC mismatch! Current working directory does not match either TOPDIR, ORIGINAL_TOPDIR or CANONICAL_TOPDIR

2015-06-17 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, Sitting in the build OpenJDK workshop at Devoxx UK and I have the following issue on Mac OS X (building jdk9). Error: SPEC mismatch! Current working directory /Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/jdk9 --- Seems to be related to:

Re: Error: SPEC mismatch! Current working directory does not match either TOPDIR, ORIGINAL_TOPDIR or CANONICAL_TOPDIR

2015-06-17 Thread Martijn Verburg
of that character. As a workaround, try CDing out and into the directory again but with the proper name and then rerun configure and make. /Erik On 2015-06-17 12:00, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi all, Sitting in the build OpenJDK workshop at Devoxx UK and I have the following issue on Mac OS X

Build success!

2015-06-17 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, In an attempt to be the most annoying person on build-dev in June (do you hand out prizes, because I'm totally winning). I'm now at the error: comparison of array 'rasterP-sppsm.offsets' not equal to a null pointer is always true bug aka https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8080993

Re: Mac OS X - error: out-of-line definition of 'getenv' does not match any declaration in 'os' in os_bsd.cpp

2015-06-17 Thread Martijn Verburg
, please stack up the beverages score of what I owe all of you when we next meet in person! Cheers, Martijn On 17 June 2015 at 13:49, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote: On 17/06/2015 9:06 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi all, Building jdk9 on latest Mac OS X, XCode/Clang etc. Not sure

Re: Mac OS X build errors missing instancetype + further issues just after building jdk.xml.ws

2015-04-17 Thread Martijn Verburg
my blinders on for a few weeks. What's the original goal here? Are you just trying to build OpenJDK 9 on Mac OS X? If you're using clang in Xcode then it should just work. -DrD- On Apr 16, 2015, at 6:35 AM, Martijn Verburg martijnverb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David, Thanks for your

Re: Mac OS X build errors missing instancetype + further issues just after building jdk.xml.ws

2015-04-16 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi David, Thanks for your response! I was using GCC as I had a host of other errors when using clang :-|. I'll post those in a separate mail for comparison. Cheers, Martijn On 15 April 2015 at 18:22, David DeHaven david.deha...@oracle.com wrote: Mac OS X 10.10.3, latest Xcode (6.3), using

Mac OS X build errors missing instancetype + further issues just after building jdk.xml.ws

2015-04-15 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, Mac OS X 10.10.3, latest Xcode (6.3), using GCC 4.8 After getting past the defined(__OPENBSD__) bug I'm running into a host of new errors starting with: /Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJDK_projects/jdk9/hotspot/agent/src/os/bsd/MacosxDebuggerLocal.m:26:

Build attempts to install /usr/local/jvm/ binary in an invalid location on Mac OS X

2015-04-14 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, Using Configuration: using configure arguments '--with-boot-jdk=/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines /jdk1.8.0_40.jdk/Contents/Home/ --with-tools-dir=/opt/local/bin/ --with- toolchain-type=gcc --with-freetype-lib=/usr/X11/lib/ --with-freetype -include=/usr/X11/include/freetype2/'. -

Re: Build attempts to install /usr/local/jvm/ binary in an invalid location on Mac OS X

2015-04-14 Thread Martijn Verburg
On 14 April 2015 at 11:46, Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Martijn, On 2015-04-14 10:05, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi all, Using Configuration: using configure arguments '--with-boot-jdk=/Library/ Java/JavaVirtualMachines /jdk1.8.0_40.jdk/Contents/Home

Re: FYI: Build system rewrite in Ant

2015-04-01 Thread Martijn Verburg
I'm personally willing to provide a ANT to MAVEN conversion tool which will allow for a more verbose an rdable build system. It will also ensure that dependencies are always downloaded at all times ensuring network pipes are kept clean. Cheers, Martijn On 1 April 2015 at 10:21, David Katleman

Re: Build error with javac Main not being found when building java.transaction module on Mac OS X

2015-02-10 Thread Martijn Verburg
, so a separate hg update should not be needed. Did you have local changes requiring a merge? /Magnus 9 feb 2015 kl. 12:46 skrev Martijn Verburg martijnverb...@gmail.com: @Erik and everyone else, whacks head on desk, my sincere apologies and thank you for your patience! Indeed

Re: Build error with javac Main not being found when building java.transaction module on Mac OS X

2015-02-09 Thread Martijn Verburg
:45, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi Erik/Alan, Not sure if this information is useful at all but the following tmp file was left behind: /Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJDK_ projects/jdk9/build/macosx- x86_64-normal-server-release/jdk/modules/java.transaction

Re: Build error with javac Main not being found when building java.transaction module on Mac OS X

2015-02-09 Thread Martijn Verburg
repo is properly up to date. It should contain: module namejava.transaction/name dependjava.base/depend depend re-exports=truejava.rmi/depend export namejavax.transaction/name /export /module /Erik On 2015-02-09 11:32, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi Erik

Re: Build error with javac Main not being found when building java.transaction module on Mac OS X

2015-02-09 Thread Martijn Verburg
) ... ... === To Erik's later suggestion, there's also no mention of java.transaction in the module-deps.gmk file. Cheers, Martijn On 6 February 2015 at 23:16, Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com wrote: On 2015-02-06 17:46, Martijn Verburg wrote: /Users/karianna

Re: Build error with javac Main not being found when building java.transaction module on Mac OS X

2015-02-06 Thread Martijn Verburg
/Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJDK_projects/jdk9/jdk/src/java.transaction/share/classes/javax/transaction/TransactionRolledbackException.java Cheers, Martijn On 6 February 2015 at 15:42, Martijn Verburg martijnverb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alan, Thanks for the quick response! I've

Re: README-builds.html update

2015-02-06 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, So I started digging into this (just the HTML path to start with) and the diff got pretty ridiculous. So I'm going to split the work into several parts: 1.) Fix HTML warnings and convert HTML styling to CSS styling (using internal stylesheet) 2.) Cosmetic changes to improve readability

Re: Build error with javac Main not being found when building java.transaction module on Mac OS X

2015-02-06 Thread Martijn Verburg
-release/jdk/modules/java.transaction/_the.java.transaction_batch] Error 1 make[2]: *** [java.transaction-java] Error 2 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs Cheers, Martijn On 6 February 2015 at 11:43, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote: On 06/02/2015 11:32, Martijn Verburg

Re: Build error with javac Main not being found when building java.transaction module on Mac OS X

2015-02-06 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi Alan, On 6 February 2015 at 16:06, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote: On 06/02/2015 15:42, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi Alan, Thanks for the quick response! I've executed: rm -rf build bash configure make clean images == Unfortunately the same error comes up

Re: Build error with javac Main not being found when building java.transaction module on Mac OS X

2015-02-06 Thread Martijn Verburg
not being built correctly or moved to the right place. I'm not seeing any other clues (even at trace) that indicates why interim_langtools.jar has not been built Cheers, Martijn On 6 February 2015 at 16:24, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/06/2015 04:20 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote

Re: README-builds.html update

2015-02-03 Thread Martijn Verburg
, Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com wrote: On 2015-02-01 11:16, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi all, I'm sitting at FOSDEM and was reminded that we hadn't yet made the effort to integrate the How to build OpenJDK material we've built up over on adoptopendk.java.net (the incubator site

README-builds.html update

2015-02-01 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, I'm sitting at FOSDEM and was reminded that we hadn't yet made the effort to integrate the How to build OpenJDK material we've built up over on adoptopendk.java.net (the incubator site for Adoption Group activities) as well as tidying up some typos and HTML compatibility warnings in the

Re: Official and community supported build platforms for JDK 8 and 9

2014-12-02 Thread Martijn Verburg
://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Supported+build+platforms That wikispace is owned by the Build Group, so all Members of that Group as listed in the Census [0] should be able to edit the page. Thanks, iris [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#build -Original Message- From: Martijn Verburg

Re: Official and community supported build platforms for JDK 8 and 9

2014-12-02 Thread Martijn Verburg
Thanks Magnus, appreciate it! Cheers, Martijn On 2 December 2014 at 15:42, Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com wrote: On 2014-12-02 14:43, Martijn Verburg wrote: That's a no for now then - in that case - do folks just want us firing any updates we are aware of to this mailing

Re: Can not get codes by get_source.sh at Japanese environment.

2014-10-01 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi Yuji, Martijn here (we met at Hackergarden). The OpeJDK mailing lists don't accept attachments, are you able to copy the content of the patch (diff) and post in the body of the message? Cheers, Martijn On 1 October 2014 16:59, Yuji Kubota jark...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I wrote this

Proposal to update build documentation

2014-04-08 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, The Adoption Group is about to embark on it's migration of all of its documentation on building OpenJDK (adoptopenjdk.java.net contains a bunch of pages). We found your group page at http://openjdk.java.net/groups/build/and wiki at https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Main and

Suggested changes for Build Group Page (add jdk9 and build-infra links)

2014-04-08 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, Was just looking at http://openjdk.java.net/groups/build/ and noticed that there's no links for: 1.) jdk9 build docs - http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/build/raw-file/tip/README-builds.html ? 2.) The build-infra-dev mailing list - (Is build-dev effectively dead/dormant now?) I think

Re: How to add options to the javac build in the JDK 8 repo?

2013-09-06 Thread Martijn Verburg
Wouldn't be an open source project without a hall of shame ;-). For us casual contributors the longer list is actually helpful as it gives us places to go and focus, the problems.txt test exclusions also fit in this category. Cheers, Martijn On 6 September 2013 08:18, Magnus Ihse Bursie

Re: PING: [PATCH] Enable debug info on all libraries for OpenJDK builds

2013-04-11 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, We're looking to help alleviate these sorts of issues with the Betterrev project. Basically patches will get build against common platforms/forests and results sent back to the submitter and the appropriate OpenJDK mailing list. We still have some way to go, but early work is looking

Re: New build system problems

2013-03-06 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hey All, As an aside to this - we're looking to build a distributed build farm that will enable folks to test changes on at least the common platforms. If you want to help out (especially if you have Build/Jenkins/CI/Git/Mercurial expertise) then please drop me a note off-list. Cheers, Martijn

Re: problem building OpenJDK on Windows 7 in langtools

2013-02-04 Thread Martijn Verburg
I'm on my phone so can't check this specific case but we do have slightly more up to date instructions on the adoptopenjdk.java.net wiki for windows builds, so perhaps you can try there. Cheers, Martijn PS: Yes these instructions are coming back to OpenJDK working on that with Dalibor soon On

Re: Jdk8 Build Failures in Solaris

2012-11-20 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi Dan, I can't help with the first two, but the 3rd item you can simply run: bash ../autoconf/configure Assuming bash is installed etc Cheers, Martijn On 20 November 2012 06:48, Dan Xu dan...@oracle.com wrote: Hi, Today I tried to build jdk8 in Solaris, but I got several different

Re: Building OpenJDK projects and JTReg in Eclipse

2012-09-19 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, CCing in build-infra and Jon on behalf of code-tools who I think will be interested. In particular we're using build-infra now for the AdoptOpenJDK build instructions. Next step is to verify this early work and automate it with some Vagrant/Puppet magic. Cheers, Martijn On 18 September

Re: webrev failure?

2012-09-03 Thread Martijn Verburg
Yep, had that done already, I'll link to your blog post for the Adopt OpenJDK build - Thanks! Martijn On 3 September 2012 12:18, Dalibor Topic dalibor.to...@oracle.com wrote: On 8/12/12 1:39 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi David, Aha! :-). Any ideas on how far I need to downgrade the version

Re: webrev failure?

2012-08-14 Thread Martijn Verburg
old hg ( I use 0.9.5 ) and an installed forest extension. Now, 'webrev -f' should work just fine ;-) We could go with 1) or 2) - I'll work that into our process. Cheers, Martijn On 11/08/12 17:04, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi all, Apologies if these are the wrong mailing lists, but I'm

Re: webrev failure?

2012-08-14 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi Mark, On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:39:57PM +0100, Martijn Verburg wrote: Aha! :-). Any ideas on how far I need to downgrade the version of hg? (I'm 2.3 at the moment). I am at 2.2.3. The hgforest extension as maintained at http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/hgforest (which is a merge

Re: webrev failure?

2012-08-12 Thread Martijn Verburg
-Dmitry On 2012-08-11 20:04, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi all, Apologies if these are the wrong mailing lists, but I'm assuming that the webrev tool falls under this domain somewhat. In order to get patches into the OpenJDK as cleanly as possible, we're looking to utilise webrev (since it's

Re: webrev failure?

2012-08-12 Thread Martijn Verburg
from my ~/.hgrc [extensions] forest=/home/dms/.hgext/forest.py [format] usefncache=no -Dmitry On 2012-08-12 14:16, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi Dmitry, Thanks for the hints! After following the forest extension install instructions at http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4/raw-file/tip

Re: webrev failure?

2012-08-12 Thread Martijn Verburg
... -Dmitry On 2012-08-12 15:09, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi Dmitry, I put your version of forest.py into my /Users/karianna/.hgext/ directory and I've altered my .hgrc file is as follows: ui.username=karianna [extensions] forest=/Users/karianna/.hgext/forest.py [format] usefncache

Re: webrev failure?

2012-08-12 Thread Martijn Verburg
it to - and that that requires the forest extension. That said the forest extension is not working with recent mercurial versions. :( David On 12/08/2012 2:04 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi all, Apologies if these are the wrong mailing lists, but I'm assuming that the webrev tool falls under this domain somewhat

Re: jdk8 makefile changes

2012-08-11 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, Forgot to send this in: Ran on 10.7.2 OS X with latest Oracle JDK 7 binary as the bootstrapper. All ran fine, ../autoconf/configure did not have execute permissions though, so had to chmod u+x it. Not sure if that's a manual step you want people to take or not. A couple of errors which

webrev failure?

2012-08-11 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, Apologies if these are the wrong mailing lists, but I'm assuming that the webrev tool falls under this domain somewhat. In order to get patches into the OpenJDK as cleanly as possible, we're looking to utilise webrev (since it's the std and all). Running ksh ./make/scripts/webrev.ksh -f

Re: Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

2012-05-15 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, Cheers, Martijn snip snip The 2nd option would be the most up to date I guess but seems a bit chicken and egg.. I normally use the latest jdk8 binary, but as I said above, sometimes it still fails. In this case, do a full build and save the j2sdk-image directory somewhere as

Re: Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

2012-05-15 Thread Martijn Verburg
, Weijun Wang weijun.w...@oracle.com wrote: This looks like the bug I mentioned. You should move the jdk8_tl/build/linux-amd64 directory to somewhere else. -Weijun On 05/15/2012 09:11 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi all, Cheers, Martijn snip snip The 2nd option would be the most up

Re: First build-infra push to jdk8 -- try out the new build system!

2012-04-21 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi Henri, I believe so yes, Fredrik does have a Mac after all ;-) Cheers, Martijn On 21 April 2012 12:34, Henri Gomez henri.go...@gmail.com wrote: New build system has been tested allready on OSX ? Le 21 avr. 2012 à 09:10, Fredrik Öhrström oehrstr...@gmail.com a écrit : For the new build

Is the use case of full OpenJDK followed by the jdk sub tree possible?

2012-04-21 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, For the javac bug warnings day I'm trying to set-up a VM which contains a full clone of http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl (into the ~/jdk8_tl directory). I'm then building the full OpenJDK with: LANG=C ALT_BOOTDIR=/opt/java/1.7.0_03 (an installation of Oracle's binary) The full build

Re: Incorrect bootstrap jdk in documentation

2012-04-21 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi John, I'm not sure going forwards if the documentation is supposed to cover all OpenJDK forests (in terms of version numbers, that is, OpenJDK 7 and OpenJDK 8) or whether the documentation will diverge depending on what forest you're in. I've got a few doc patches I'm holding off on until we

Re: Is the use case of full OpenJDK followed by the jdk sub tree possible?

2012-04-21 Thread Martijn Verburg
Ignore this, I found an old thread with some advice that I'd forgotten to follow smacks forehead - M On 21 April 2012 15:27, Martijn Verburg martijnverb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, For the javac bug warnings day I'm trying to set-up a VM which contains a full clone of http

Gawk missing from make sanity check?

2012-04-16 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, I've been building various VM's in preparation for our next OpenJDK hack day (as well as testing out build-infra). My VM is an Lubuntu 11.10 (32-bit). I noticed that when: make sanity passes, make clean still fails due to gawk not being available. This is a simple fix but I thought

Re: Gawk missing from make sanity check?

2012-04-16 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, I'll also add that g++ and the various X11 extension libraries are also not looked for by make sanity (as far as I can tell). Again, simple enough to fix/find, but just in case this was expected to be picked up. Cheers, Martijn On 16 April 2012 10:08, Martijn Verburg martijnverb

Re: Where does 'make sanity' look for the ANT version?

2012-03-29 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi Sergey, I corrected a permissions problem on the tools.jar file and make sanity ran smoothly after that. Now having fun trying to find the exact Ubnutu package that contains the X11 headers the build needs, but that's a different story :-) Hi, Martijn. This should works sudo apt-get

Re: Where does 'make sanity' look for the ANT version?

2012-03-28 Thread Martijn Verburg
output and is possibly not even running ant at all. I'll forward this to my colleague to see whether he has anything to add. s'marks On 3/26/12 3:55 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi all, So I'm building new VMs to try the various OpenJDK builds and have run across a pretty consistent

Where does 'make sanity' look for the ANT version?

2012-03-26 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, So I'm building new VMs to try the various OpenJDK builds and have run across a pretty consistent problem using Lubuntu 11.10 (32-bit) with the detection of ANT. I have ANT 1.8.2 installed (Ant 1.7 is clearly removed) but 'make sanity' insists that the ANT version I have is 1.7.0. * My

Re: Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

2012-03-25 Thread Martijn Verburg
interested in building the jdk repo, you can update your ALT_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH variable to point to a recent 7u4 build. e.g export ALT_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH=/export/home/jdk1.7.0_04 recent binaries at : http://jdk7.java.net/download.html HTH, Sean. On 23/03/2012 09:46, Martijn Verburg

Re: Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

2012-03-25 Thread Martijn Verburg
On 25 March 2012 13:11, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote: On 25/03/2012 13:01, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi Sean/Alan/Max, Sean - Your solution did the trick, and I'll probably use this for now as it means a smaller VM for the members to work with Alan/Max - I did get the full build

Re: Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

2012-03-23 Thread Martijn Verburg
and build are at the same directory levels. Therefore the build is inside tl/jdk. -Max On 03/23/2012 01:51 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi Andrew/Alan, Thanks for responding! I suspect you are right, I'm only building the tl project, which i guess is a partial build? I saw the patch

Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

2012-03-22 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all, I'm back from holiday and am building the latest ( http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk) project for our 3rd Java User Group OpenJDK hack day. I've run across an error that I haven't been able to resolve. .. ..

Re: Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

2012-03-22 Thread Martijn Verburg
will likely be a q about building the hotspot part or providing the extra info Andrew requested. Cheers, Martijn On Thursday, 22 March 2012, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote: On 22/03/2012 15:19, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi all, I'm back from holiday and am building the latest ( http