Hi Erik,
Thank you for the quick review. I have fixed all your comments in this
new webrev, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sfriberg/JDK-8061281/webrev.02
Cheers,
Staffan
On 08/12/2015 03:15 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
On 2015-08-12 01:34, Staffan Friberg wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately we have
Hi,
Unfortunately we have not yet got the new repositories created in
OpenJDK for JEP-230 that was discussed earlier this year [1]. However I
wanted to make sure we are ready to push as soon as those repositories
are created.
These two webrevs contain updates to the build scripts to add the
Hi,
On 12/04/2014 10:23 PM, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
On 12/4/2014 4:34 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Staffan,
On 2/12/2014 10:08 AM, Staffan Friberg wrote:
Hi,
Hopefully this is the right list for this discussion.
As part of adding Microbenchmarks to the OpenJDK source tree, I'm
trying
Hi Jon,
On 12/05/2014 01:52 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 12/05/2014 11:46 AM, Staffan Friberg wrote:
Hi,
On 12/04/2014 10:23 PM, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
On 12/4/2014 4:34 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Staffan,
On 2/12/2014 10:08 AM, Staffan Friberg wrote:
Hi,
Hopefully this is the right
On 12/03/2014 02:58 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2014-12-02 23:45, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com wrote:
Staffan,
That seems to put it on the low end for reasonably being its own
repo, if you wanted that, at least, as
are in the same repository that is easier to understand and
maintain.
$.02, Roger
On 12/1/2014 7:08 PM, Staffan Friberg wrote:
Hi,
Hopefully this is the right list for this discussion.
As part of adding Microbenchmarks to the OpenJDK source tree, I'm
trying to understand how we best would add
, Staffan Friberg staffan.frib...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
(Adding the jdk9-dev list to increase the visibility of the discussion)
With the multiple sub-repository commit mechanism improved I believe this might
be less of an issue. JPRT can push JDK and HS changes at together and the same
02:08 PM, Staffan Friberg wrote:
Hi Chris,
Agree, there is no major reason this needs to be a new repository, as
I mentioned in the 3 options below it would work well without it. The
main thing I want to achieve is that the benchmarks are located on
the top level. The suite will contain
Hi,
Hopefully this is the right list for this discussion.
As part of adding Microbenchmarks to the OpenJDK source tree, I'm trying
to understand how we best would add the benchmark sources to the
existing OpenJDK tree structure.
Since the microbenchmark suite will cover all parts of the
