Re: RFR: AARCH64: 8064357: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-21 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/21/2014 03:46 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: Almost there! :-) 1) Comment in config.sub identifies it as config.guess. 2) As as understand it, your first attempt is to just dispatch through to autoconf-config.sub if there is no aarch64 arguments. Good! However, the code could be

Re: RFR: AARCH64: 8064357: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-21 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-11-21 18:02, Andrew Haley wrote: On 11/21/2014 03:46 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: 1) Comment in config.sub identifies it as config.guess. 2) As as understand it, your first attempt is to just dispatch through to autoconf-config.sub if there is no aarch64 arguments. Good! However, the

Re: RFR: AARCH64: 8064357: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-21 Thread Vladimir Kozlov
Thank you, Magnus I will push this into aarch64 staging repo after testing in JPRT. Vladimir On 11/21/14 10:03 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2014-11-21 18:02, Andrew Haley wrote: On 11/21/2014 03:46 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: 1) Comment in config.sub identifies it as config.guess.

Re: RFR: AARCH64: 8064357: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-21 Thread Dean Long
One minor comment: do we want to preserve the history in the new config.sub, or check it in as a new file? dl On 11/21/2014 10:03 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2014-11-21 18:02, Andrew Haley wrote: On 11/21/2014 03:46 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: 1) Comment in config.sub identifies it

Re: RFR: AARCH64: 8064357: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-21 Thread Vladimir Kozlov
The history is preserved since patch is applied above config.sub. I did 'hg copy config.sub autoconf-config.sub' and then applied the patch. And there are only 2 changesets in config.sub: changeset: 574:b66c81dfa291 user:ohair date:Mon Jan 14 16:38:25 2013 -0800 summary:

Re: RFR: AARCH64: 8064357: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-21 Thread Dean Long
I was thinking 'hg mv config.sub autoconf-config.sub' and then 'hg add config.sub' so it doesn't look like we are modifying the upstream version of config.sub, but maybe it's not a big deal? dl On 11/21/2014 12:03 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: The history is preserved since patch is applied

Re: RFR: AARCH64: 8064357: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-21 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/21/2014 06:03 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: Thanks for working through all these iterations! Oh, the thanks should be the other way around. I really want this to be right. Andrew.

Re: RFR: AARCH64: 8064357: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-21 Thread Dean Long
This may be a bug in webrev. If 'hg log -f' shows it as a new file, that should be enough. dl On 11/21/2014 2:37 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: I did as you said: hg mv common/autoconf/build-aux/config.sub common/autoconf/build-aux/autoconf-config.sub $ hg st M

Re: RFR: AARCH64: 8064357: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-19 Thread Andrew Haley
I think this covers everything that reviewers have mentioned: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aph/aarch64-8064357-4/ Andrew.

Re: RFR: AARCH64: 8064357: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-18 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/13/2014 03:03 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 11/13/2014 03:00 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: hg mv config.sub autoconf-config.sub hg cp config.guess config.sub and then fix config.sub so that it runs autoconf-config.sub and modifies the output to what you expect it to be from config.sub