On 18/04/2016 5:28 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2016-04-17 12:37, David Holmes wrote:
I missed all the fun while I was on vacation and have still not yet
had a chance to look at the actual code, but have one query ...
Yeah, bad timing, but time was also running out. There is still time for
On 2016-04-17 12:37, David Holmes wrote:
I missed all the fun while I was on vacation and have still not yet
had a chance to look at the actual code, but have one query ...
Yeah, bad timing, but time was also running out. There is still time for
adjustments of course.
On 6/04/2016 7:10 PM,
I missed all the fun while I was on vacation and have still not yet had
a chance to look at the actual code, but have one query ...
On 6/04/2016 7:10 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Dan and thank you for the review! I know it's a lot to chew through.
I have incorporated your changes and
On 06/04/16 10:14, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
I assume the mx projects are for Java code or do they also generate
projects for native? The new top level target is only meant to replace
the old Visual Studio project generator, at least for now.
+1 for having the build system a more central
On 2016-04-07 11:57, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2016-04-06 11:10, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Dan and thank you for the review! I know it's a lot to chew
through.
I have incorporated your changes and published a new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8152666/webrev.02/
I'm not
On 2016-04-06 11:10, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Dan and thank you for the review! I know it's a lot to chew
through.
I have incorporated your changes and published a new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8152666/webrev.02/
I'm not sure if I'm formally allowed to be a reviewer, since
> On Apr 5, 2016, at 11:14 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I assume the mx projects are for Java code or do they also generate projects
> for native?
Also native. Look at the screenshots I posted. Particularly this one:
I'm good with all of your replies/resolutions.
I did forget to say thanks for sticking with the rework of the
HotSpot build system! There have been a few attempts in the
past to rework the HotSpot build system, but no one was able
to make much progress let alone finish it. Kudos!!
Dan
On
Hello,
I assume the mx projects are for Java code or do they also generate
projects for native? The new top level target is only meant to replace
the old Visual Studio project generator, at least for now.
/Erik
On 2016-04-06 03:23, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Apr 5, 2016, at 8:10 AM,
Hello Dan and thank you for the review! I know it's a lot to chew through.
I have incorporated your changes and published a new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8152666/webrev.02/
On 2016-04-05 20:10, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> The new build supports the following variants:
>
> *
> On Apr 5, 2016, at 8:10 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty
> wrote:
…
> make/Main.gmk
>No comments other than the 'hotspot-ide-project' target
>looks interesting...
Btw. there is already support to generate IDE configurations today via mx:
On 3/25/16 2:03 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Here is the initial review for the new Hotspot Build System, as
described in " JEP 284: New HotSpot Build System". This patch adds the
new build system along side the old and makes the new system the
default. The old build system will remain
Hello,
Here is the initial review for the new Hotspot Build System, as
described in " JEP 284: New HotSpot Build System". This patch adds the
new build system along side the old and makes the new system the
default. The old build system will remain for a (hopefully) short while
until we feel
13 matches
Mail list logo