Re: [9] RFR (xs) 8168317: [JVMCI] use reflection instead of jdk 9 Module API in Services.java

> On Oct 24, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Doug Simon wrote: > >> >> On 24 Oct 2016, at 23:24, Christian Thalinger wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 24, 2016, at 3:48 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: >>> >>> Adding build-dev, which should be

Re: [9] RFR (xs) 8168317: [JVMCI] use reflection instead of jdk 9 Module API in Services.java

> On 24 Oct 2016, at 23:24, Christian Thalinger wrote: > > >> On Oct 24, 2016, at 3:48 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: >> >> Adding build-dev, which should be included when discussing build issues. For >> any new readers, please see [1] for the

Re: [9] RFR (xs) 8168317: [JVMCI] use reflection instead of jdk 9 Module API in Services.java

> On Oct 24, 2016, at 3:48 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > > Adding build-dev, which should be included when discussing build issues. For > any new readers, please see [1] for the full discussion. > In theory it is possible to compile against and run on the exploded image

Re: [9] RFR (xs) 8168317: [JVMCI] use reflection instead of jdk 9 Module API in Services.java

Thank you, Erik, for explanation. Then I will go with the reflection solution. We can revert/simplify it in JDK 10 when jdk 9 will be used as boot JDK. Thanks, Vladimir On 10/24/16 6:48 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Adding build-dev, which should be included when discussing build issues. For any

Re: [9] RFR (xs) 8168317: [JVMCI] use reflection instead of jdk 9 Module API in Services.java

Adding build-dev, which should be included when discussing build issues. For any new readers, please see [1] for the full discussion. In theory it is possible to compile against and run on the exploded image during the build, but I do not recommend it. Igor is correct in the build team being