Changeset: ccd42d367593
Author:tbell
Date: 2007-11-12 20:52 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/corba/rev/ccd42d367593
7654322: touch all Makefiles
! make/Makefile
! make/com/Makefile
! make/com/sun/Makefile
! make/com/sun/corba/Makefile
! make/com/sun/corba/se/Makefile
Changeset: 39fdd477b25b
Author:tbell
Date: 2007-11-12 20:52 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/hotspot/rev/39fdd477b25b
7654322: touch all Makefiles
! agent/make/Makefile
! agent/src/os/linux/Makefile
! agent/src/os/solaris/Makefile
! agent/src/os/solaris/dbx/Makefile
!
Changeset: dd4fa618b39a
Author:tbell
Date: 2007-11-12 20:53 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jaxp/rev/dd4fa618b39a
7654322: touch all Makefiles
! make/Makefile
Changeset: a9506f9440d4
Author:tbell
Date: 2007-11-12 20:53 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jaxws/rev/a9506f9440d4
7654322: touch all Makefiles
! make/Makefile
Changeset: 9442b90a75e1
Author:tbell
Date: 2007-11-12 20:53 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/9442b90a75e1
7654322: touch all Makefiles
! make/Makefile
! make/com/Makefile
! make/com/sun/Makefile
! make/com/sun/crypto/provider/Makefile
!
Changeset: 5f835b2631d9
Author:tbell
Date: 2007-11-12 20:54 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/5f835b2631d9
7654322: touch all Makefiles
! make/Makefile
! src/share/opensource/javac/Makefile
! test/Makefile
Vote: yes
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Joe Darcy has proposed the JDK 6 Project [1].
Should the Build Group sponsor this Project?
Please cast your vote by replying to this message with either
Tim
Alexey Ushakov wrote:
Hello Max,
Actually, we've already found this problem and passed to the team
responsible for the code (Cannot provide you bug id at the moment
though, but will do as soon as I get it). For now you can use following
workaround in openjdk sources (that worked for me):
(that is what I run, all the time, as much as
possible), but the JDK7 Release Engineering builds are done on Solaris 10 Update 3 (I just
checked), and those are not affected by 6637583.
We will fix this as soon as we can.
Tim
Thanks all.
Max
On Feb 6, 2008, at 1:41 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
Alexey
Hi Ted:
No, this was a rm -r -f build and make fastdebug_build. I can send you
the fastdebug.log file if you think it'll help.
Please send it to me (offline): tim.bell (at) sun.com
I will try to puzzle out what is going on. I have some from-scratch Windows XP build machines
set up and I am
Mark Reinhold wrote:
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:59:59 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Perhaps somebody who knows how this works, can update the OpenJDK
coverage at gmane and nabble?
Tim, could you please look into updating our coverage on gmane.org?
I am working on this. If anyone has
Clemens Eisserer wrote:
It looks like the mercurial-servers are down, I only get 500 -
Internal Server Error.
Thanks for letting us know.
Is this already known and when can I expect it to be fixed?
I restarted the webserver, and it is serving pages again. Let us know if this
happens
Hello Sam:
Somebody please help me to resolve this error. Please find error
message in the attachment.
[... snip! ...]
/home/samkraju/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/linux-i586/gensrc/java/nio/charset/CharsetEncoder.java:142:
cannot find symbol
symbol : class $replType$
location: class
Hi Martin:
In OpenJDK7,
If you do make sanity from the root of the forest, I get
This is new bug-ID 6710904 COMMON_BUILD_ARGUMENTS needs PREVIOUS_..._VERSION
settings
It should be visible on http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/ in 24 to 48 hours.
Tim
Hi Joël:
I sync nightly my jdk7/tl/jdk repository with
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk and build it nightly (gnumake all
images).
I created a disposable tree by cloning http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk, and I am
checking on this.
Note that this will not affect my b29
Mark Reinhold wrote:
Andrew: Thanks for the patch!
The CORBA code isn't maintained directly in OpenJDK, but rather in a
sub-project of GlassFish (https://glassfish-corba.dev.java.net/).
That's why there's no CORBA Group. (The same goes for JAXWS and JAXP.)
Ken Cavanaugh owns the
Hi Martin:
While building images in a mercurial workspace updated as of today, I get
/home/martinrb/ws/build/build/linux-i586/classes/com/sun/tools/classfile
: no such file or directory
/home/martinrb/ws/build/build/linux-i586/classes/com/sun/tools/javap :
no such file or directory
make[1]:
Changeset: a067bf2329ef
Author:tbell
Date: 2008-10-15 21:24 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/corba/rev/a067bf2329ef
6759959: VS2008 errors compiling corba sources
Summary: Update Makefiles to deal with newer Visual Studio releases
Reviewed-by: ohair
!
://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6819847
the work around is to define
IMPORT_BINARY_PLUGS=true
This was an unintended consequence of the fix for
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6661448
Hope this helps-
Tim Bell
Hi Kelly
freetypecheck has been a royal major pain in the you know what
So you are not alone.
I thought I reviewed some changes you wrote that eliminated the
freetypecheck program and instead used something like grep to check for
the version information in the freetype header files.
review fix for 6819847 [Re: [Fwd: Problems with building
jmx for OpenJDK.]]
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:08:41 -0700
From: Tim Bell tim.b...@sun.com
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I didn't think openjdk7 could build without binary plugs.
But I've been a bit disconnected from the jdk work lately.
[... snip
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
ERROR: Can't locate pre-built libraries.
Please check your access to
/NOT-SET/re/jdk/1.7.0/promoted/latest/openjdk/binaryplugs/linux-amd64
and/or check your value of ALT_BINARY_PLUGS_PATH.
Good to know it is in the queue though, as I was going
-
Tim Bell
I wrote:
The other case is if a user outside the Sun network sets
IMPORT_BINARY_PLUGS=true. Here they will need to set one of the
ALT_..._BINARY_PLUGS variables to point to the plugs anyway.
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
That suggests to me that outside Sun, there is no need for
xiomara.jayas...@sun.com wrote:
Thumbs down -- sorry Tim, this fix breaks the product build.
Indeed it did. Sigh. I am working on a fix under bug-ID 6824595
OpenJDK fix breaks product build for jdk7. No wonder everyone is
afraid to touch these Makefiles. My build checklist just got
Changeset: ecb7723aaa7c
Author:tbell
Date: 2009-04-01 04:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/ecb7723aaa7c
6824595: OpenJDK fix breaks product build for jdk7
Reviewed-by: xdono, ohair
! make/Makefile
Georg Koppen wrote:
There NAWK=$(NAWK) should be
changed to NAWK=$(NAWK). Otherwise I get an error during compiling
like /bin/sh -v command not found.
Kelly - thanks for filing 6824976 Fix NAWK assignment in shell script
jdk/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk
It should be visible in a day or
control build, they will be blindsided (and very surprised :-)
by this set of changes.
Hope this helps prevent some confusion-
Tim Bell
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/langtools/rev/e2722bd43f3a
[2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jdk/rev/d201987cb76c
2. Even if I set NO_IMAGES=true, why is the images still built?
Try also setting DEV_ONLY=true. I think these are tied together for some
historic reason.
Yes - take a look at top-level/make/jdk-rules.gmk, starting at
line 65:
ifndef DEV_ONLY
JDK_BUILD_TARGETS = sanity all
Colin(Du Li) wrote:
I tried to build a product version jdk by setting environmental variable
SKIP_DEBUG_BUILD=true, SKIP_FASTDEBUG_BUILD=true.
But I check the output jdk version, the information as follows:
openjdk version 1.7.0-internal-debug
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build
Hi Kelly
Need reviewer.
681: java -Xrunhprof crashes when running with classes compiled with
targed=7
Related to 6855180, assert logic could get segv, investigation found
next one.
6858127: Missing -DNDEBUG on Linux and Windows native code compiles
The C/C++ macro NDEBUG when
Changeset: 7e491e39ea0f
Author:tbell
Date: 2009-08-06 17:16 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/7e491e39ea0f
6865853: Additional code changes needed to build deploy using WXP SP2 and
Visual Studio 2008
Reviewed-by: ohair
!
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Most of the targets (all included) are in the ant script, and listed
in ANT_TARGETS. So 'make all' runs 'ant all'.
Ah - of course. Now I see it. So this is a very thin Makefile around
ant. That is where the world has been headed for quite a while, I guess...
Tim
Hi Folks
When building OpenJDK, the freetype sanity check compiles a
little program to test that the freetype include files and
libraries are available, and also that the version number is
acceptable.
If building on Windows and using a Visual Studio compiler
newer than 2003, this program will
*macros.
*/
#define FREETYPE_MAJOR 2
#define FREETYPE_MINOR 3
#define FREETYPE_PATCH 5
Tim
-kto
Tim Bell wrote:
Hi Folks
When building OpenJDK, the freetype sanity check compiles a
little program to test that the freetype include files and
libraries are available, and also
Changeset: b3aac0db5586
Author:tbell
Date: 2009-08-21 12:12 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/b3aac0db5586
6705913: freetype_versioncheck.exe - Unable To Locate Component
Summary: Update freetype_versioncheck to deal with newer Visual Studio releases
Hi Martin
A way to check at runtime, since freetype 2.0.9, is
- A new function named `FT_Library_Version' has been added to
return the current library's major, minor, and patch version
numbers. This is important since the macros FREETYPE_MAJOR,
Hi Martin
Well, I have to side with Microsoft on this one.
So do I, actually. The O/S directories should be read-only.
I take issue with the alternative presented to developers
and ISVs all over the world, which is that they must redistribute
the runtime with their product. Everyone has to
Max (Weijun) Wang wrote:
It's a new opensolaris 2009.06 installed by lab guys here.
In fact, you can see this JDK installation from a LiveCD of
opensolaris. Just like a normal JDK, there are bin/ and jre/ (no lib/)
under /usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0. But the bin/ directory only
David Holmes - Sun Microsystems wrote:
Tim Bell said the following on 08/25/09 13:51:
I am also running OpenSolaris 2009.06 on my home system.
/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/bin looks more like a JRE than a JDK:
So is this a deployment bug or an OpenSolaris bug or what? Surely a JRE
should
I wrote:
I am currently using Cygwin GNU make v3.80 on Windows due to the
later Cygwin builds not supporting MS-DOS drive letters or paths:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/raw-file/tip/README-builds.html#gmake
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I have a 3.81 for cygwin at
David Holmes wrote:
On Solaris 10 /usr/sfw/bin/gmake (which IIRC comes from the Solaris
companion CD) is 3.80.
Correct - anything in /usr/sfw or /opt/sfw is from a Software Companion CD.
/java/devtools/sparc/bin/gnumake is 3.78.1
I presume the devtools version will be updated to 3.81 ?
Brad wrote:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I have a 3.81 for cygwin at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/make.exe
This binary sums to the same value as the one on cmake.
Brad Spent way too much time on this in July Wetmore
Ow - my head hurts. So we need Windows GNU make version 3.81 that
also
Hi Kelly:
We have run into a corba build problem, not all the classes are
getting delivered via the corba/dist/lib/classes.jar file.
It appears to be some strange interaction with VPATH and the
wildcard logic I added recently in changeset
Pete Brunet wrote:
Thanks Tim, It must be something else. Here are my two environment
variables:
ALT_FREETYPE_HEADERS_PATH=C:/Progra~1/GnuWin32/include
ALT_FREETYPE_LIB_PATH=C:/Progra~1/GnuWin32/lib
Good - that looks OK.
freetype was installed via the binary installer at
Pete Brunet wrote:
I ran make -d sanity today and see the following. I don't know why it
doesn't want to build freetype_versioncheck.exe. It doesn't exist.
There is however a file named freetype_versioncheck.exe.manifest so to
make sure that isn't a problem I commented out its build from
Pete Brunet wrote:
Here is what my PATH looks like:
$ echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/cygdrive/c/Program
Files/Microsoft
Visual Studio 9.0/Common7/IDE:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual
Studio
9.0/VC/BIN:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I can't see the webrev right now due to the server issues.
% date
Fri Oct 9 15:08:00 PDT 2009
The fact that we all got this email, and that I can load up
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/drops/webrev.01/
Makes me hopeful that the .ojn servers are back online.
But -
Gary Benson wrote:
As an update to my previous message, the HotSpot part of this patch
was tested and pushed to hotspot-comp last night, so the remaining
code for review is this:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbenson/zero-11-build/
I'm going on vacation on Friday 16, returning Monday 26,
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
The fix for bug 688:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/14bd992a
breaks the build as it tries to use javah from ALT_JDK_IMPORT_DIR (via
JAVA_TOOLS_DIR) which is not set on normal builds.
The README tells the user to set ALT_BOOTDIR and changing
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
(snip!)
I think there's still an issue here that makes this patch worth
pushing. The 688 fix didn't cause the bug, but merely made it
visible to a lot more people. So 6889255 will only hide it again.
The build uses JAVA_TOOLS_DIR for javac, javah and javadoc:
Hi Kelly
I need some formal reviewers on these jdk/test/Makefile changes.
More polish and changes may need to be done later, but there
is value in what I have now, and I need lots of help to improve
things (and fix some of our testcases).
This is a great start.
Here is the bugid and
Max (Weijun) Wang wrote:
Hi Kelly
This is the first time I build windows-amd64 with Visual Studio 2008.
At the freetypecheck stage, it cannot find the MSSDK61 path. According
to make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk, it's something like --
$(_program_files)/Microsoft
Hi Max-
Is there some reason you stay with v6.0A, rather than upgrading to
$(_program_files)/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v6.1/ ?
No reason. 6.0a is the SDK that comes with VS2008, and I didn't
realize an upgrade is needed.
According to my notes, Kelly got a response from a program manager
at
Hi Folks
Here is the bug report:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6899737
Here is the proposed fix (works when using both Visual Studio 2003 and VS 2008
on Windows XP SP2):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tbell/6899737.00/
This is a blocker for my work on the full Visual Studio
Changeset: 9956e8d71e06
Author:tbell
Date: 2009-12-18 09:40 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/9956e8d71e06
6899737: JDK build fails in make/java/jli because of _vsnprintf macro
redefinition
Summary: Use stdio.h instead when building with Visual Studio 2008
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Is it tl or build for this one?
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Either one should be fine. Whatever is easier for you.
Not sure what the tl schedule is right now.
I expect to push TL to master tomorrow afternoon (8 January) for b79.
If you don't mind waiting for b81, feel
Vote: yes
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com wrote:
Should the following person be added as a member of the OpenJDK Build Group?
David Katleman http://db.openjdk.java.net/people/katleman
David is a member of the Release Engineering team in Santa Clara.
Vote: yes
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com wrote:
[Sorry about all these emails, but the build-dev alias is the group alias
too.]
Should the following person be added as a member of the OpenJDK Build Group?
Phil Race http://db.openjdk.java.net/people/prr
Vote: Yes
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com wrote:
Should the Build Group sponsor the Build Infrastructure Project [1]?
Please cast your vote by replying to this message with either
Vote: yes
or
Vote: no
as the first line of the message body.
Vote: yes
- Tim
Vote: yes
Tim
://blogs.oracle.com/TimBell/entry/building_openjdk7_on_32_bit
http://blogs.oracle.com/TimBell/entry/building_openjdk7_on_32_bit2
http://blogs.oracle.com/TimBell/entry/building_openjdk7_on_32_bit3
Tim Bell
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Phil Race philip.r...@oracle.com wrote:
I concur. Out of the box, 32 bit
Hi Kelly
Need a reviewer for these build-infra changes to the strip properties utility
in the corba repository.
7153266: Adjustments to corba strip property utility (neutral to builds)
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk8/infra-corba/webrev/
Looks good overall.
I find this is a bit
I wrote:
I find this is a bit alarming - won't it overwrite the input file with
the output file?
120 String infile = inIter.next();
121 String outfile = outIter.next();
Sorry, I meant to pick on these lines, and also mention that
args.length should be an even
This is all as expected, although perhaps questionable style.
Given Fredrik's comments too, are you ok with the changes?
Thanks for the back-story on this corner of the build.
I am fine with the changes.
Tim
Looks good to me. Line 314 of CompileJavaClasses.gmk is an 'order-only'
prerequisite - I had to look it up as I have only seen it used one other time.
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Prerequisite-Types
Tim
On 06/04/12 07:15, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I have created a
) is resolved.
Thanks in advance for your review and feedback -
Tim Bell
[1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/
On 06/16/12 09:36, Pete Brunet wrote:
When using hg commands I always get:
*** failed to import extension defpath from
C:\Users\Pete\hg-extensions\defpath\defpath.py: No module named HTMLParser
I am using cygwin 1.7.0 (instead of the latest due to needing to run on
Windows 7).
Did this hg
On 06/18/12 10:25, Andrew Haley wrote:
The README-builds.html instructions say...
Slow Builds:
...
Creating the javadocs can be very slow, if you are running
javadoc, consider skipping that step.
But there is no information I can find about how to skip that step: I
think it's
.
jtreg test runs of the '-automatic -noshell' tests under test/java/lang
test/java/math test/java/util ran as expected (2 failures, both known
bugs).
Thanks in advance for your review and feedback - I'd like to get these
changes in soon.
Tim Bell
On 06/13/12 22:31, Tim Bell wrote:
Hello
On 06/27/12 15:26, John Coomes wrote:
I only looked at the hotspot changes, which are fine.
One minor request. In hotspot/make/windows/makefiles/defs.make:
215 else
216 ifeq ($(USING_MINGW), true)
217 ABS_OUTPUTDIR := $(shell $(CD) $(OUTPUTDIR);$(PWD))
218 ABS_BOOTDIR
.
But overall, I see no reason to block this work from being integrated.
As long as the current RE MKS builds are ok.
JPRT build jobs are going through OK.
Thanks for the review-
Tim
-kto
On Jun 27, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
I went over the open changes again and removed some debug code left
it if it is OK).
Thanks in advance-
Tim Bell
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tbell/7152336/webrev.02/
Additional comments inline:
On 07/03/12 00:40, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
please see my comments inline..
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:07 AM, David Holmesdavid.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Tim,
On 3/07/2012 1:52 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
All-
This is the hotspot-only portion of the changes to allow
On 07/16/12 10:52, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Minor change to the get_source/hgforest scripts to allow for trailing //
Plus adding the whitespace normalizer perl script to the openjdk7updates forest.
7184406: Adjust get_source/hgforest script to allow for trailing // characters
On 07/17/12 17:16, David Holmes wrote:
I'm not sure if you are agreeing with me :) so to be clear. We have:
Thanks for the clarification. I think we all agree here, but best to be
sure.
COMPILE_JAVAC=$(BootStrapDir)\bin\javac $(BOOTSTRAP_JAVAC_FLAGS)
COMPILE_RMIC=$(BootStrapDir)\bin\rmic
I wrote:
My test build is running now. I'll update the webrev and send out a
new URL.
The test builds were successful. I also ran full hotspot builds on JPRT
using '-release jdk8' and '-release jdk7u6', so there is no regression
in the old builds. I believe I have addressed the review
/shared.make
Let me know if there is anything I can do to help you out.
Tim
On 08/02/12 10:46, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Tim,
I'm the RT_Baseline gatekeeper this month so I'll take a
look at the changes and shepherd them into RT_Baseline.
Dan
On 8/2/12 11:30 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
Ping? I
On 08/02/12 14:20, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tbell/7181175/webrev.01/
Thanks for the review, Dan.
make/windows/makefiles/defs.make
No comments.
make/windows/makefiles/rules.make
lines 28-33: Might want to comment on why these paths still
use
:45, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Thumbs up on this version.
Do you have a commit message ready for this patch?
Dan
On 8/3/12 1:26 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
On 08/02/12 14:20, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tbell/7181175/webrev.01/
Thanks for the review, Dan.
make/windows
On 08/03/12 15:09, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Gotta put 'tbell' in there some where...
Can I add you as a reviewer?
Oh - that's right. Sure, add me as a reviewer.
Tim
Dan
On 8/3/12 3:58 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
Thanks, Dan
How about this for a commit message:
7181175: Enable builds
.
Dan
-kto
On Aug 3, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Added you to the reviewer list. You're also the user for the
changeset. The job is in the JPRT-hotspotwest queue heading to
RT_Baseline.
Dan
On 8/3/12 5:08 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
On 08/03/12 15:09, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote
Hello all-
After the fixes for 7181175 hit the hotspot-rt forest, users noticed
that hotspot/make/windows/create.bat builds were broken.
This is a supplemental fix that restores building using that .bat file.
Note that this is not on the 'product' build path at all - this is
something
I wrote:
Hello all-
After the fixes for 7181175 hit the hotspot-rt forest, users noticed
that hotspot/make/windows/create.bat builds were broken.
This is a supplemental fix that restores building using that .bat
file. Note that this is not on the 'product' build path at all - this
is
On 08/10/12 14:08, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 8/10/12 3:07 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
I wrote:
Hello all-
After the fixes for 7181175 hit the hotspot-rt forest, users noticed
that hotspot/make/windows/create.bat builds were broken.
This is a supplemental fix that restores building using
On 08/11/12 12:12, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 8/11/12 3:49 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Dan,
On 2012-08-11 01:08, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
One-line addition of two double quotes... Gotta love Windows.
It's not about windows. Unpack workspace to mypath with spaces and try
to build
On 09/05/12 21:08, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Need a reviewer for this change.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk8/jdk8-this-file/webrev/
It does change source, but it's effectively a build change.
The goal here is to try and create more predictable binary files and remove the
On 10/07/12 16:36, David Holmes wrote:
This is a simple fix contributed by Mark Weilaard to add the
OPENJDK=true make variable to COMMON_BUILD_ARGUMENTS so that it gets
passed down to the component builds - in particular hotspot:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8000461/webrev/
Looks
Hi Jon:
Is there, should there be a FAQ for the new build, along the lines of
a series of How do I ... questions?
-- Jon
Have you been through README for the New Build System?
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/build-infra/guide.html
Section 9 of that doc is a FAQ.
We can certainly
Changeset: 0a5931be9176
Author:tbell
Date: 2012-10-23 10:10 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/corba/rev/0a5931be9176
7152336: Enable builds on Windows with MinGW/MSYS
Summary: Minimal makefile changes to enable building OpenJDK using MSYS on
Windows7
Reviewed-by:
Changeset: a0a2b186ae28
Author:tbell
Date: 2012-10-23 10:10 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/a0a2b186ae28
7152336: Enable builds on Windows with MinGW/MSYS
Summary: Minimal makefile changes to enable building OpenJDK using MSYS on
Windows7
Reviewed-by:
Changeset: c12e759ac4e8
Author:tbell
Date: 2012-10-23 10:10 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/c12e759ac4e8
7152336: Enable builds on Windows with MinGW/MSYS
Summary: Minimal makefile changes to enable building OpenJDK using MSYS on
Windows7
Reviewed-by: ohair,
Looks good to me also.
Always good to see code deletion take place.
Tim
On 10/26/12 09:31, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Looks ok to me.
We may need to do some builds both ways to make sure.
-kto
On Oct 26, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
We're jettisoning the legacy JDBC-ODBC bridge from
Anthony:
Please review a fix for
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8001764 at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anthony/8-46-full-vs2012.0/
These changes look fine.
We're not yet switching JDK builds to VS2012. However, the vsvars.sh
script is useful for other applications in
On 10/29/12 12:06, Anthony Petrov wrote:
That's correct. Currently we don't have any plans to change compilers
for JDK 8. It will be discussed with the release team when need arises.
OK, thanks. Sorry if I sounded a bit fussy, but I want to avoid last
minute surprises if we can, and it is
On 11/06/12 21:08, David Holmes wrote:
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8002040/webrev/
This is a simplified variant of the change just made to Hotspot.
Instead of disabling FDS when cross-compiling we change the default
location of objcopy, and just as with native compilation
On 11/07/12 06:38, Erik Joelsson wrote:
This is essentially the patch from Vincent to make build-infra work on
Solaris 11.1 with some minor adjustments to keep the new and old build
equal.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8002365/webrev.01/
Looks good to me.
Tim
On 11/08/12 06:27, Erik Joelsson wrote:
New webrev for root:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8002028/webrev.root.02/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eerikj/8002028/webrev.root.02/
Changed to conditional as David suggested.
Improved the description and fail message in
Vote: yes
On 11/07/12 09:52, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Please cast your vote or veto by replying to this message
1 - 100 of 943 matches
Mail list logo
