> On Mar 6, 2017, at 10:17 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2017-03-07 03:22, David Holmes wrote:
>> On 7/03/2017 6:32 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>>
On Mar 6, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Christian Thalinger
wrote:
>
On 2017-03-07 03:22, David Holmes wrote:
On 7/03/2017 6:32 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Mar 6, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Christian Thalinger
wrote:
On Mar 3, 2017, at 4:09 PM, David Holmes
wrote:
Hi Christian,
I think you need to pass
On 7/03/2017 6:32 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Mar 6, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Mar 3, 2017, at 4:09 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Christian,
I think you need to pass an absolute directory, in which all the custom
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Christian Thalinger
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 3, 2017, at 4:09 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> I think you need to pass an absolute directory, in which all the custom
>> files, regardless of
> On Mar 3, 2017, at 4:09 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> I think you need to pass an absolute directory, in which all the custom
> files, regardless of repo, are located. That is essentially how we use it -
> jdk/make/closed has files included from
Hi Christian,
I think you need to pass an absolute directory, in which all the custom
files, regardless of repo, are located. That is essentially how we use
it - jdk/make/closed has files included from other repos. Of course that
only works if names are unique.
David
On 4/03/2017 9:11 AM,
Hi Christian,
I'm cc'ing build-dev (and bcc'ing jdk8u-dev) as that may be a more appropriate
venue for this discussion.
-Rob
On 03/03/17 10:19, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> At Twitter we are using the custom extension mechanism to separate our
> additional code from upstream in order to