On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 16:36:18 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> You need to expand this logic to cover more instances. See e.g. lib-ffi.m4
>> for inspiration.
>>
>> Basic flow:
>> * if user has specified libsleef root with argument, check both lib/ and
>> lib64/ under that root.
>> * if user
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 01:48:14 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Time to start making preparations for JDK 23.
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The pull request now contains 15 commits:
>
> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8319413
> - Add
On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 20:40:57 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
>> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update symbol files to JDK 22 b26.
>
> test/langtools/tools/javac/versions/Versions.java line 97:
>
>> 95:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 08:31:17 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
>> The final thing we need to resolve properly is the SVE compiler test.
>>
>> @theRealAph says:
>>> arm_sve.h is part of GCC. It was added to GCC in 2019.
>>
>> A more relevant question is what version of gcc it was added, and if that
>>
> Time to start making preparations for JDK 23.
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The pull request now contains 15 commits:
- Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8319413
- Add symbol files.
- Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8319413
- Merge
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 22:15:24 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>>
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 22:15:24 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>>
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:48:44 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> But you are saying that you want to skip building this library unless you
>>> have a gcc version that supports c++17?
>>>
>> Yes, the request is to skip building the simdsort library if GCC version is
>> < 8 as only GCC >= 8
> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>
> For serial sort on random data, this PR shows upto ~7.5x
> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>
> For serial sort on random data, this PR shows upto ~7.5x
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:39:04 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Reflecting review feedback - keeping CT_TRANSITIVE_MODULES separate from
>> CT_MODULES.
>
>
> As part of:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16505
>
> there are new symbol files for JDK 22, and @jddarcy noted the content looks
> weird.
>
> I was investigating, and found a few problems, some introduced by
>
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 21:31:42 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> As part of:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16505
>
> there are new symbol files for JDK 22, and @jddarcy noted the content looks
> weird.
>
> I was investigating, and found a few problems, some introduced by
>
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 08:31:17 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
>> The final thing we need to resolve properly is the SVE compiler test.
>>
>> @theRealAph says:
>>> arm_sve.h is part of GCC. It was added to GCC in 2019.
>>
>> A more relevant question is what version of gcc it was added, and if that
>>
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 16:49:28 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Oh, and:
>>
>> If we can't trust SLEEF not to break the ABI we're using, we should not be
>> using SLEEF.
>
>> @theRealAph You are making good points.
>>
>> You are basically saying: "we don't need any configure support for libsleef,
>>
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 20:19:56 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> Raising the minimum gcc version is not done willy-nilly. (I feel a "You just
>> don't ..." meme coming up)
>>
>> But you are saying that you want to skip building this library unless you
>> have a gcc version that supports
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:33:09 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> make/autoconf/flags-cflags.m4 line 565:
>>
>>> 563: # The -utf-8 option sets source and execution character sets to
>>> UTF-8 to enable correct
>>> 564: # compilation of all source files regardless of the active code
>>> page on
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 21:31:42 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> As part of:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16505
>
> there are new symbol files for JDK 22, and @jddarcy noted the content looks
> weird.
>
> I was investigating, and found a few problems, some introduced by
>
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:29:07 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Julian Waters has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 78 commits:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into patch-10
>> - Fix awt_Window.cpp
>> - Fix
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 09:39:09 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> We should set the -permissive- flag for the Microsoft Visual C compiler, as
>> was requested by the now backed out
>> [JDK-8241499](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8241499). Doing so makes
>> the Visual C compiler much less
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 16:44:28 GMT, Markus Grönlund wrote:
>> A question about "level". Is the intention that the value can be anything,
>> e.g. some new event next month might use the values "1", "2, "3"? Just
>> asking because ordinarily deprecated vs. terminally deprecated is very
>> specific
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 16:44:28 GMT, Markus Grönlund wrote:
>> A question about "level". Is the intention that the value can be anything,
>> e.g. some new event next month might use the values "1", "2, "3"? Just
>> asking because ordinarily deprecated vs. terminally deprecated is very
>> specific
> Greetings,
>
> please help review this enhancement to add a JFR event to report runtime
> invocations of methods that have been declared deprecated in the JDK.
>
> Testing: jdk_jfr, CI 1-6, stress testing
>
> Thanks
> Markus
Markus Grönlund has updated the pull request incrementally with
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 09:39:09 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> We should set the -permissive- flag for the Microsoft Visual C compiler, as
>> was requested by the now backed out
>> [JDK-8241499](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8241499). Doing so makes
>> the Visual C compiler much less
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 16:45:49 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> The final thing we need to resolve properly is the SVE compiler test.
>
> @theRealAph says:
>
> > arm_sve.h is part of GCC. It was added to GCC in 2019.
>
> A more relevant question is what version of gcc it was added, and if that
25 matches
Mail list logo
