On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 19:22:01 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Why initial patch was reverter using this comment: "unfortunately, did not
> prove to be as useful as expected"? What was the problem? What about the
> "pedantic" option which was added last time?
Hi, the problem was that gcc and
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 04:04:58 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> We should set the -permissive- flag for the Microsoft Visual C compiler, as
>> was requested by the now backed out
>> [JDK-8241499](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8241499). Doing so makes
>> the Visual C compiler much less
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 20:57:24 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> I have no time to look at the client changes for quite some time so do not
> push it. No matter how many other people approve it. And in the meantime you
> can (1) explain how many client tests you ran - and it had better be all of
> them
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 21:20:42 GMT, Dean Long wrote:
> I had the same confusion, reading "-permissive-" the same as /permissive, but
> the trailing "-" means disable.
Ah, my brain just saw that trailing - as somebody's idea of hyphenation.
That's questionable syntax by the compiler IMO.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 04:04:58 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> We should set the -permissive- flag for the Microsoft Visual C compiler, as
>> was requested by the now backed out
>> [JDK-8241499](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8241499). It can be done
>> with some effort, given that the
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 04:04:58 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> We should set the -permissive- flag for the Microsoft Visual C compiler, as
>> was requested by the now backed out
>> [JDK-8241499](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8241499). It can be done
>> with some effort, given that the
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 04:04:58 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> We should set the -permissive- flag for the Microsoft Visual C compiler, as
>> was requested by the now backed out
>> [JDK-8241499](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8241499). It can be done
>> with some effort, given that the
> We should set the -permissive- flag for the Microsoft Visual C compiler, as
> was requested by the now backed out
> [JDK-8241499](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8241499). It can be done
> with some effort, given that the significantly stricter gcc can now compile
> an experimental
