On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 21:29, tito wrote:
>
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 19:31:28 +0200
> "Roberto A. Foglietta" wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 15:40, tito wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm not the maintainer so I can say nothing about integration,
> > > I can just point out things that look
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 19:31:28 +0200
"Roberto A. Foglietta" wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 15:40, tito wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not the maintainer so I can say nothing about integration,
> > I can just point out things that look strange to me and my limited
> > knowledge.
> > When I read
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 15:40, tito wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not the maintainer so I can say nothing about integration,
> I can just point out things that look strange to me and my limited knowledge.
> When I read that this code is faster vs other code as I'm a curious
> person I just try to see how
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 13:35:56 +0200
"Roberto A. Foglietta" wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 08:02, tito wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I just adopted the test in the PERFORMANCE section of your source
> >
> > ** PERFORMANCES
> > ***
> > *
> >
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 08:02, tito wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I just adopted the test in the PERFORMANCE section of your source
>
> ** PERFORMANCES
> ***
> *
> * gcc -Wall -O3 strings.orig.c -o strings && strip strings
> * rm -f [12].txt
> *
Igor,
There have been a number of problems with the sleep built-in.
It was recently disabled by this commit:
https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=5e0411a7fb510b9aecda0a850c76bdd62c50efa4
>ash: disable sleep as builtin, closes 15619
>Has a few annoying problems:
>* sleepcmd() ->
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 03:36:52 +0200
"Roberto A. Foglietta" wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 22:37, tito wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 21:39:57 +0200
> > "Roberto A. Foglietta" wrote:
> >
> > > To the maintainers and everyone else whom can be interested,
> > >
> [...]
> >
> > Hi,
> > seems
