After I posted a buggy code and Thomas found the bug, Peternilsson42 wrote:
> C90 doesn't support mixed declarations and statements. A C90 compiler would not compile that code, but the bug was at runtime. Why some people use C90 compilers yet? > In more serious projects, The real code is much bigger. It was a collage to reproduce the bug. > There is no length modifier for size_t in C90. In C99 it's > z, e.g. %zu. But %u isn't guaranteed to work in either > language. Common practice is to cast to unsigned long. This is useful information. You really read all that doc. Thank you. > As Thomas mentions, this is where your bug is. Tired programmers write bugs for idle programmers to find. > It's good to see that you're using %p to print pointers. > However, you should know that they won't necessarily work > for void **. You should cast it to void *. I think it would not compile in such compiler. I just worry for runtime problems. I'll be much occupied the next days, but I hope to help debug your code some day in the future. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. http://sims.yahoo.com/