Re: [casper] Different Software Versions

2022-02-21 Thread Adam Isaacson
Hi Kaj, We are definitely an open collaboration :). A lot of people have done good work documenting what we have. This includes Morag and many others. Mitch has done amazing work and has done his best to document everything, but the RFSoC is new, so there will be teething issues and we ask for

Re: [casper] Different Software Versions

2022-02-21 Thread Kaj Wiik
On 21/02/2022 22:15, Morag Brown wrote: While I think most people on this mailing list can certainly share your frustrations with getting the toolflow to work, I think it's important to emphasize that this is an open collaboration that many contribute to without it strictly speaking being

Re: [casper] Different Software Versions

2022-02-21 Thread Morag Brown
Hi Kaj, While I think most people on this mailing list can certainly share your frustrations with getting the toolflow to work, I think it's important to emphasize that this is an open collaboration that many contribute to without it strictly speaking being part of their critical work duties. As

Re: [casper] Different Software Versions

2022-02-21 Thread Kaj Wiik
Hm, I have never heard about PRP cloud, what is that? I went to the web address and got to login without any further information. If this is a service that is open for all, why it is not documented? If it is not open for all, why even write about it to a public mailing list?? I am sorry but

Re: [casper] Different Software Versions

2022-02-21 Thread Jonathon Kocz
As a quick reminder to all, don't forget that the PRP cloud version of CASPER exists these days as well! (Login here: https://casper.nautilus.optiputer.net/). In addition to the normal toolflow, Vivado 2020.1 is now installed (I know that 2020.2 is recommended for RFSoC, but 2020.1 should work as

Re: [casper] Different Software Versions

2022-02-21 Thread Adam Isaacson
Hi Kaj and Wesley, You are both right. The Python upgrades have proved a problem and it would help to list it in the documents. The requirements.txt can be too general though using versions "<" or ">". RFSOC is a new development, so I understand there could be bugs. I was more referring to the

Re: [casper] Different Software Versions

2022-02-21 Thread Wesley New
Hi Kaj, There is generally a requirements.txt in the root of the mlib_devel which should list any python dependencies and appropriate versions. I am not sure how well this is kept uptodate though. Regards Wes On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:24 PM Kaj Wiik wrote: > Hi Adam, > > I am sorry but I

Re: [casper] Different Software Versions

2022-02-21 Thread Kaj Wiik
Hi Adam, I am sorry but I missed your reply too. The reason for us to experiment with different versions was to get RFSoC (specifically ZCU111) stuff working (by following the documentation in

[casper] Different Software Versions

2022-02-21 Thread Adam Isaacson
Hi Casperites, I hope you are well. I have been reading the mail list and there are lots of queries about which version of Ubuntu, Python, Matlab and Simulink. We have documented this quite well on our Casper website, but I have noticed that some people try it on Windows, different versions and