Hi,
Is it possible to set the user clock to arbitrary frequencies using
the DCM without venturing too far from the CASPER tool flow? Any
examples would be appreciated, either for the BEE2 or iBOB
Thanks,
Glenn
that variable to get around the problem.
-Terry
On May 5, 2008, at 6:51 PM, G Jones wrote:
Hello,
Was a work around ever found for using the green blocks for long
FFTs/PFBs? I am running into the problem where the initial value
vector in a block ram is too long so it gets truncated
I am also interested in this. I see that the clock measure and reset
functionality seems to be implemented in
/pcores/opb_clockcontroller/hdl/user_logic.vhd
All of the logic in there seems like it should work, but when you look at
the system.mhs file, the relevant signals are connected to dcm_2 in
I haven't had exactly this problem, but I have had designs meet timing
and then changing just the slightest thing makes it miss timing by a
lot. I think the place and route is sort of heuristic, so just by
chance it gets an easy job some days and other days it spends hours
going in the wrong
I think what must be happening is even though your iBOB and BEE2 are
running on the same clock, the XAUI links have independent 156.25 MHz
clocks, so even though the same data rate is going in as coming out,
the data is available at the other end of the link at slightly
different times, so they
Hello,
I'm trying to start using the 10.1 tool flow. Compiling a simple design with
the iBOB LWIP block yields this error:
ERROR:MDT - IPNAME:opb_ethernetlite HW_VER:1.01.a - Can not find valid MPD
I opened XPS and indeed it seems like the only version available is 2.00.a
Is there any way to get
19, 2008 at 11:46 AM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
(Replying to the list for the benefit of everyone once the archive is
created.)
I copied the previous version over, and everything went smoothly up until
the CopyFiles part for generating the drivers. It seems to still be copying
files are not being found.
Does anyone know why this might be the case, or how I might fix this? I
see
the same behavior regardless if I run through bee_xps or just xps from
the
command line.
Thanks,
Glenn
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:48 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com
wrote
Hello,
I think I am seeing the problem with the 10.1 FFT that Terry told me about
involving the Configurable Subsystems used for the twiddle generators. I
think the solution may be in this paragraph from the MATLAB help about
Configurable Subsystems:
Note If you add or remove blocks from a
Hello again,
Sorry for all the 10.1 related emails.
Does anyone know if libraries in general should use the Behavioral HDL
option or not? The register retiming parameter seems to have changed to
Behavioral HDL in the delay block for instance. Do these really behave the
same way?
Thanks,
Glenn
I'm going to remove the reconfigurable blocks from the FFT blocks today.
Glenn
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Jason Manley jasonman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Andrew
Terry, Mark and I were actually chatting about this yesterday.
I think this might be due to the use of the reconfigurable
Hello,
I think I am seeing some strange XAUI slippage related to the OOB signal
when sending data from an iBOB to a BEE2. It sounds similar to an effect
that was seen at Green Bank.
My iBOB is set up to send 64 bits of data on both XAUIs every other clock
with the FPGA clocked at 250 MHz, so the
I finally found the problem. In the system.xmp file the line:
LinkOpt: #IF# strcmp(get(b,'type'),'xps_lwip') #LinkOpt: -llwip4
should be:
LFlags: #IF# strcmp(get(b,'type'),'xps_lwip') #LFlags: -llwip4
I have updated the SVN.
Thanks for helping/letting me think out loud to solve this.
Glenn
dav...@astro.berkeley.eduwrote:
Great sleuthing, Glenn! Do you whether LFlags works with earlier EDK
versions or is that a 10.1 change?
Thanks,
Dave
On Sep 3, 2008, at 11:13 , G Jones wrote:
I finally found the problem. In the system.xmp file the line:
LinkOpt: #IF# strcmp(get(b,'type
'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [Software/executable.elf] Error 1
ERROR:MDT - Error while running make -f system.make init_bram
No changes to be saved in MSS file
No changes to be saved in XMP file
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:13 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
I
I looked into this a while ago, and it looked like there was support for the
IIC in the BORPH source, but I couldn't get it to compile because I didn't
know where the .h files I needed were or how to get the relevant memory
locations. If anyone figures this out, I'd be interested to know.
Glenn
Hello,
Does anyone have drawings of the aluminum plates that iBOB and iADCs come
mounted on that fit in 6U crates handy?
Thanks,
Glenn
Hello,
I am finding that if I open a 10.1 design in MATLAB, I almost always get a
segmentation fault which seems to be related to the find_system call in
reuse_block. I can avoid the error by first creating a new simulink design
and dragging some reconfigurable blocks from the CASPER DSP libraries
Hello,
I am finally trying to run some of the designs I have compiled using the
10.1 toolflow on my BEE2 and am running into problems. When I run the bof
file, it just hangs. If I check the proc directory, I see that the ioreg
directory and contents are correct, but reading or writing the files
I forgot to mention, the blinking LED design is running properly on the FPGA
(the LEDs blink as expected) so it seems to be an issue with the selectmap
or borph.
Glenn
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:51 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am finally trying to run some of the designs
outputs there as well, so this may be a very old bug, or it may be something
flawed with my test.
Glenn
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:58 AM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached is a simple 7.1 model that illustrates the problem. The out0 from
each fft is different even though the pol0
they are anymore). Could you see if you can reproduce
the problem in the FFT testbench design?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:15 AM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
I just noticed a bug in the model I sent: I am unpacking a 18_17 complex
number as an 8_7 complex number. However, this does
Hi everyone,
I just spent a long time struggling with this problem, so I wanted to warn
others in case you run into it.
It seems that the 10.1 DDC blocks simulate fine in simulink, but something
goes wrong when building the design. The major symptom is that the filter
does not have the expected
a feeling that these
counters might not have resets, causing the two counters to come up at
random times relative to one another, shifting the phases of the
sin/cos and thus the real/imag components. This could be fixed by
propagating a sync into these counters.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:44 AM, G
want me to just proceed with mine, and then we can converge
in the future.
Thanks,
Henry
G Jones wrote:
For anyone who's interested, I've begun porting the map function used in
the pink reorder blocks to 10.1. For complex reorderings, the green block
seems to be inefficient since
if you want me to wait so we standardize on yours, or
if you want me to just proceed with mine, and then we can converge
in the future.
Thanks,
Henry
G Jones wrote:
For anyone who's interested, I've begun porting the map function used in
the pink reorder blocks to 10.1. For complex
flip flops as expected since the latency was set to one.
Glenn
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:37 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
I just threw together a quick design which has two roms, one with ''use
placement information turned on and one with it off, and also my port of
the espresso
map. The espresso map ended
up as simply flip flops as expected since the latency was set to one.
Glenn
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:37 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
I just threw together a quick design which has two roms, one with ''use
placement information turned on and one
I'm in the process of back porting most of the improvements that have been
made to the green blocks in 10.1. I am committing my changes to
http://casper.berkeley.edu/svn/branches/backport_to_7_1/ for anyone who is
still using 7.1 and would like to benefit from the improvements.
Glenn
Hi John,
I started a backport branch of the 7.1 library in
http://casper.berkeley.edu/svn/branches/backport_to_7_1/
If you check that out with SVN you'll find the FFT block there uses the new
(pink espresso style) reorder block. Eventually I'll expose a setting so you
can choose between the logic
Hello,
I often do the run init_bram thing on my designs after changing the
powerPC software. Is there an existing, easy way to get the
implementation/download.bit file to be moved to the bit_files directory with
the design and timestamp name format?
Thanks,
Glenn
Hello,
I've made a spectrometer that uses a 2^11 point biplex (num inputs = 2^0)
FFT block, and it works great. I then changed it to 2^12 points and it looks
good except that when I put in a CW tone, I get the expected spike plus
another spike 2048 channels away. I've checked everything I can
Hi John,
That's strange, I am routinely using the GAVRT library with the backported
7.1 libraries. I will upload a snapshot of the GAVRT library to the SVN
under the caltech directory right now. What sort of failures are you seeing?
Glenn
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:05 AM, John Ford jf...@nrao.edu
Ah yes, I've had that happen to me. Unfortunately the superslice block seems
to disconnect itself when it gets changed because it has to reassign the
port numbers to keep the outputs sensible. I'm not sure why it reconfigures
itself like that . I haven't had it happen to me inside another library
Hi John,
I've definitely run into the same issue, but haven't had a chance to
tackle it yet. It could be a pain, but I would try to hack the design
to change the PFB coefficients by one LSB or something in one location
so they can't be optimized together. It might also help to try and
change
I think this makes a lot of sense, and now that you mention it I think
I recall having similar experiences. Distributed RAM involves making
up the coefficient memory, some few Kbytes, out of ~16x1 bit memory
elements, so the address logic has to fan out to all of those tiny
elements. The BRAM (I
Hi John,
I have brought this up a few time on this and the BEE2 mailing lists
(archives???). I would assume that the setting is volatile. I was
unable to get enough information to try to bit-bang the IIC bus from
the powerPC, despite going through the linux source. There is IIC code
there, but I'm
Dave,
I tried both things you suggest in my attempts to improve throughput.
memcopy works well, and seems to attain ~ 10 Mbit/s. I also defined my
own XIo_In32 as:
#define XIo_In32(InputPtr) (*(volatile Xuint32 *)(InputPtr))
to avoid the eieio operand being executed. This certainly improved the
Dave,
Some answers below.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:49 AM, David MacMahon
dav...@astro.berkeley.eduwrote:
Thanks, Glenn!
On Nov 17, 2008, at 11:33 , G Jones wrote:
I tried both things you suggest in my attempts to improve throughput.
memcopy works well, and seems to attain ~ 10 Mbit/s
Hello,
I know this question comes up a lot, but is a 3 meter XAUI cable usable for
transmitting data from an iBOB to a BEE2? I have ready Suraj's memo about
testing the link integrity versus preemphasis and differential swing, in
which he says packets were always lost eventually. Is this common in
Wan,
The simplest operation of the snap block is as follows:
Write 0 to the snap_ctrl file/register
Write 7 to the snap_ctrl file/register to force enable, trigger, and write
enable to be true (look under the snap mask to see how it works)
Read snap_addr and wait for it to be snaplength - 1 (2047
wrote:
HI Glenn:
Thanks for your great help. By the way, what's the offset when I read from
snap_bram? 1 or 4?
Thanks
Wan
--
*From:* G Jones [mailto:glenn.calt...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, 27 May 2009 11:31 AM
*To:* Cheng, Wan (ATNF, Marsfield)
*Cc
This is documented on the CASPER wiki FAQ:
http://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/FAQ#Q:_I.27m_getting_a_brefclk_error_when_building_a_BEE2_design_with_10_GbE.3F
Glenn
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:13 PM, William Chauncey Barott
baro...@erau.eduwrote:
Hi all-
Can anyone point me to the magic for
Dan,
This sounds to me like the behavior I see with long transforms with the
maximum coefficient depth setting, where the block tries to use the trick of
storing only rounded roots of unity for the last stages. I can't look into
it in detail right now, but I recommend looking under the masks to
: Friday, 28 August 2009 10:51 AM
To: G Jones
Cc: Beresford, Ron (ATNF, Marsfield); casper@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [casper] ROACH progress.
thanks glenn,
the trick of using a small number of coefficients
for a large transform should work. we've done
million point transforms using
Hello,
I'm compiling a design for the BEE2 which uses 240 of the 328 BRAMs.
Sometimes when I compile the design, I run into error messages like
this:
Phase 8.9
WARNING:Place:119 - Unable to find location. BLOCKRAM component
John,
I think the shortcomings of xlUpdateModel are what made the transition
from 7.1 to 10.1 so painful. Dynamically drawn blocks like the vacc
will not be handled correctly in general. Therefore, I think it will
be much easier and reliable to simply redraw the diagram block for
block in 10.1.
Hello,
I've finally started compiling some ROACH designs under 11.3. One
thing that I noticed is that the PAR phase now reports both setup and
hold timing metrics while routing. I also noticed hold times being
critical paths in the timing reports now. I don't remember ever seeing
anything like
Hello,
I'm suddenly having trouble with my linux 11.3 machine. Whenever I
update a diagram containing the yellow MSSGE block, matlab crashes
because of a segfault in an S-function of one of the xilinx blocks in
the design. For example, a design with nothing but a counter, MSSGE
token and XSG
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:56 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm suddenly having trouble with my linux 11.3 machine. Whenever I
update a diagram containing the yellow MSSGE block, matlab crashes
because of a segfault in an S-function of one of the xilinx blocks in
the design
Hello,
I'm getting started using the quadADC with ROACH so I made a simple
design to simply catch the ADC data into a snap block. I set the ADC
clock to 200 MHz and the system clock source to adc0, also at 200 MHz.
When I run the compilation, I get a few timing violations, all saying
that the
Hello,
Sorry to bother you all with this, but I'm having trouble getting my
ROACH to mount the network file system. I followed the guide, and the
DHCP seems to work as well as the TFTP portion. However, when it's
time to mount the root file system, I get:
Sending DHCP requests ., OK
IP-Config:
All,
Thanks for the help, the /24 solved the problem. This is missing from
the guide, so I'll update the wiki.
Next problem: what's the login for the etch file image? I downloaded
the 2009-11-30 image. trying to log in as root yields: Login incorrect
without prompting for a password. I looked at
My mistake, this was a side effect from trying to chmod -R 777 the
roach_boot directory. Logging in as root works now.
Glenn
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:58 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
Thanks for the help, the /24 solved the problem. This is missing from
the guide, so I'll
compile before falling-over with
cryptic (read: unrelated) error messages.
Jason
On 11 Dec 2009, at 20:32, G Jones wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting started using the quadADC with ROACH so I made a simple
design to simply catch the ADC data into a snap block. I set the ADC
clock to 200 MHz
Hello,
The auto_tap_init.m script has a clause that references use_bram_delay, but
this variable is not present in the block mask, so an error is generated
when the block is updated. Fixing this is going to require updating the
casper_library.mdl file. Since I'm not an expert on the correlator
Hi Terry,
I came across something like this before... it almost looks like 11.3 is
doing too good of a job of reducing the map logic to wires, because it looks
like it's optimizing away the wires. I haven't found a solution, but maybe
this is something Xilinx would be able to fix. I think a test
Hi Tom,
One of the main bandwidth limitations in pulsar processing is the length of
the dedispersion chirp function, which goes down quadratically with
increasing frequency. Generally people split the band up into several ~4 MHz
channels and coherently dedisperse each one separately. Each of these
Keep in mind that the sync input has a 50 ohm termination resistor, so you
need a signal generator capable of providing at least a ~3 V pulse across 50
ohms. You definitely do not want to drive this input with a square wave
because the 50 ohm termination resistor is small (0603 or so) so with a
These messages mean that your PowerPC code is too large. This a common
occurrence when using LWIP. You need to reduce your code size some how. One
way I've done this is by removing verbose error messages from the .c files
in the drivers directory.
If you haven't added any PowerPC code, make sure
is.
Cheers
Danny
On 23/09/2010 17:11, G Jones wrote:
Hi Danny,
What exactly are you plotting there? It looks like you have 4
simultaneous ADC samples concatenated into a 32 bit word going into
your snap block. Your plot scales are 1e8, so it seems like you may be
trying to plot the raw 32
Could it be a route problem since it works when you bind to the
interface but not to the IP? What does your routing table show?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:47 PM, mch...@physics.ucsb.edu wrote:
Hi Dave,
Good eye. Sorry, I corrected that recent blunder, but I still have the
same problem. I
Hi Dale,
The first thing I would check is connecting an RS-232 cable to see if
you can talk to the FPGA via tiny shell that way. This will also let
you run the ifconfig command to see what the iBOB thinks it's IP
address is, to make sure there's nothing funny with that. Are you
programming the
Hello,
I am trying to understand the resource requirements for the CASPER X-engine.
To reduce confusion, I'm going to consider dual polarization antennas
Looking at the xeng block in simulink, it appears that an X engine
with no demux will require about
acc_len * ceil(Nant/2 + 1) memory
Hi,
I saw this new product from Analog Devices
http://www.analog.com/en/clock-and-timing/pll-synthesizersvcos/adf4350/products/product.html
which seems like it may be a good choice for a flexible sampling clock
for CASPER projects. The evaluation board is cheaper than the Valon
boards at $175 and
for this.
Dave, Valon does not give a jitter spec, they just point to online
phase noise to jitter calculations. I'll calculate it sometime later.
Glenn
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:55 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I saw this new product from Analog Devices
http://www.analog.com/en/clock
Hi,
One of our iBOBs stopped working recently after going strong for almost 4
years. I found that the 1.5 V rail is at 0 V, implicating the TI PTH05010
regulator. Has anyone else seen one of these fail? I'm going to try swapping
it for a new part to see if the iBOB comes back to life.
Glenn
Hi,
What exactly is happening when the command does not work? Is the read not
completing or does the data not look correct? What does happen?
Glenn
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Vikas Asthana vikasf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We have a spectrometer giving out 256 FFT channels. But I am having
Hi,
I'm working on getting the ADC83000x2 yellow block working with ROACH 2. I
found that there is some issue with the automatic translation of the legacy
DCM parameters specified by that block to the new MMCM, so I have made a new
version that explicitly invokes an MMCM. I have used the clock
These goals all look very good.
Regarding the test suite, one thing I've been thinking of that could help a
lot with designing test benches is to invest in some code (or blocks) for
the tedious boiler plate that is often needed for this work. One extremely
useful function would automatically
Hi Louis,
The problem is probably that the DCM/MMCM has various configuration
parameters which have default values for the clock speeds most commonly
used for CASPER designs. To run at lower speeds, you'll need to tweak these
values. I thought they can be found in the
generation with bee_xps.
hope it helps
Marco
Il giorno 23/gen/2012, alle ore 23.57, G Jones ha scritto:
Hi Louis,
The problem is probably that the DCM/MMCM has various configuration
parameters which have default values for the clock speeds most commonly
used for CASPER designs. To run at lower
Also note that probably all that's needed in corr is katcp_wrapper (is the
original failing line something like from corr import katcp_wrapper?). So
I have gotten around installing all of the dependencies that corr has
(which are not needed for 99% of applications) by looking at the
Hi Nimish,
If the time required to load the coefficients is not critical, you could
consider using explicit dual port BRAMs with one fo the ports connected to
a shared register for data and a shared register for address. This may give
you more control in meeting timing.
We've also been
Hi Ron,
I've seen and complained about this problem under ISE/EDK 13 where blocks
that contain yellow blocks (such as the snap block) cause such crashes. My
suspicion is that the yellow block (xps_library) keeps getting ported
without modification from version to version of matlab, and the mdl
Glen,
The problem you describe sounds like an issue we had during testing at
Green Bank last December where the NRAO DHCP server would release the DHCP
entry if the client did not renew it at regular intervals. It turns out
that the ROACH linux was not renewing the DHCP entries. I think the final
I wouldn't be surprised if Ryan has a more clever way to do it, but
one option is to use an extension of the method that Matt Morgan and
Rick Fisher (i.e. http://www.gb.nrao.edu/electronics/edir/edir320.pdf)
developed for I/Q imbalance compensation. Basically you make a
filterbank with each of the
Jason R. and John,
Was the roach running a particularly intensive design at the time
around the failure? Just wondering why this part would be failing. Is
the current limit somehow being exceeded?
Thanks,
Glenn
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jason Ray j...@nrao.edu wrote:
The first time I was
Hi Ian,
This is a known problem. The solution is to use CX4 optical cables.
I'm sure someone will chime in with manufacturers and part numbers.
Glenn
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:36 PM, O'Dwyer, Ian J (382G)
ian.j.o'dw...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Is anyone successfully using 15m long cables with the
Hello,
I am running into a problem (error message below) when trying to build
simple designs for the ROACH II. I am using the ska-sa/mlib_devel
freshly cloned from github. I have double checked that my paths only
point to this version. I am using ISE 13.4 and MATLAB 2011a. The
design is very
, how's life? I haven't seen you in awhile--don't I still owe you a
beer? :-)
--Ryan
On 07/20/2012 01:51 PM, G Jones wrote:
Hello,
I am running into a problem (error message below) when trying to build
simple designs for the ROACH II. I am using the ska-sa/mlib_devel
freshly cloned from
, by 'log file', I meant 'HDL file'.
On 07/20/2012 02:13 PM, G Jones wrote:
I agree, but the mystery is how that crazy binary value is getting in
there...
I should also note that I was able to build ROACH II designs with the
casper-astro/mlib_devel, but the resulting boffiles caused a kernel
100
In the data/roach_infrastructure_v2_1_0.mpd, CLK_FREQ is set to 100.
The data type is indicated as integer which is a bit suspicous, but
it's the same in the working casper-astro/mlib_devel
Glenn
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:17 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep, I agree again
Hi,
We're working on some calibration logic for a new ADC for the ROACH II. The
logic needs an always available clock, so we're trying to use sys_clk.
Using ROACH II, when we have something like this in our system.mhs file:
BEGIN calibration_block
...
PORT clk = sys_clk
...
It compiles OK, but
Hi,
For anyone who runs into these dependency problems: Please note that
you can simply install the katcp_wrapper.py file into your python path
and it will work independently of the rest of corr (you'll still need
katcp installed of course). You can then use the functions simply by
doing:
import
I suggest using ISE 13 if that's an option for you.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Alex Zahn avzah...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been trying to get all the mssge toolflow stuff running on a new SL 5.8
machine. Everything works except that compilation fails at xst synthesis for
even the simplest
Hi,
I strongly recommend not having cygwin installed on a windows system
with the toolflow. Xilinx EDK includes its own version of cygwin and
the two will conflict with inexplicable errors and failures.
Glenn
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Gopal Narayanan go...@astro.umass.edu wrote:
Hello,
, outside of this issue with
gen_xps_files.m, I have not seen any problems with having cygwin
installed on my windows machine. I run Xilinx ISE 13.4, perhaps some of
the issues you mention are solved for this version?
Gopal
On 08/22/2012 02:18 PM, G Jones wrote:
Hi,
I strongly recommend
32-bit XP is your best (only?) choice. The ISE/EDK part of the tools
will run on linux, but not the simulink part.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Andrea Mattana
a.matt...@med.ira.inaf.it wrote:
Hi old caspers ;)
I'm going to install the dear old friend toolflow 10.1 for my IBOBs and
Bee2 on
Hi,
Someone just pointed this gpuocelot project out to me:
http://code.google.com/p/gpuocelot/ It looks pretty interesting,
particularly if the AMD/ATI cards are really able to beat the NVIDIA cards
and if this code can really make existing CUDA code run at full speed on
the AMD cards. I'm a bit
Hi Pedro,
The VEGAS 1024 channel National ADC design works fine. There is an
issue with the ADC yellow block at such high speeds where it sometimes
requires reprogramming the FPGA 2-3 times to get the data properly in
synch, but otherwise the design works fine.
Glenn
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:36
.
make clean make
should build katcp ppc_4xx-gcc
Regards
Adam
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:13 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We need to add some commands to tcpborphserver3 to support
communication commands over the external I2C bus. We did this
previously
Hi,
I'm trying to migrate some code from the ROACH to ROACH 2 which uses
the PPC I2C bus. On the ROACH we used linux/i2c-dev.h and accessed
/dev/i2c-0. The same code compiles on the ROACH 2 but does not seem to
work: the fopen call on /dev/i2c-0 fails.
To trace down the problem, I tried using the
Hi,
I seem to be running into this same problem. Will tcpborphserver2 run
on the same linux kernel or do I need to change to a borph specific
kernel?
Thanks,
Glenn
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Henno Kriel he...@ska.ac.za wrote:
Hi Dave
I think Andrews point 3 is relevant.
We have picked
Hi,
In light of the possible issues we're having with tcpborphserver3, we're
trying to revert to tcpborphserver2. To do so, we tried the uImage-r2borph2
but it is freezing at boot at
ppc-soc-ohci ppc-soc-ohci.0: USB Host Controller
ppc-soc-ohci ppc-soc-ohci.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus
To answer my own question, it appears the uImage-nousb is also setup for
tcpborphserver3.
Is there a uImage that has USB disabled and works with tcpborphserver2? We
really need this...
Thanks,
Glenn
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:45 AM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In light
logical, but I don't see any USB related changes in
the last several months...
Where is the code needed to produce a uImage file?
Thanks,
Glenn
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:10 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
To answer my own question, it appears the uImage-nousb is also setup
So far, the wordwrite workaround does not appear to be working for me, but
I'm still investigating.
Glenn
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Alec Rust alec.r...@ska.ac.za wrote:
Dave if the wordwrite workaround works lets stick to that for now. The
workaround Marc compiled is not really good for
Hi,
Is it possible to access the ARP table from the PPC on ROACH2? I'd
like to see what entries it contains and if possible populate it.
Thanks,
Glenn
, and the 02:02:0A... MAC is this ROACH2 itself. So it seems like
it is receiving and interpreting ARPs OK. It's just not sending them
itself...
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Glenn
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:58 AM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In the last couple of days our ROACH2's have decided
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo