[OSL | CCIE_RS] no Access to Proctorlabs RACKs

  Hi, Is anyone else aware of  having access issues to the racks? It seems the usual password has been change. Thanks Bauke   Username: Password: PL-POD-109-TS-RSen Password: % Error in authentication. PL-POD-109-TS-RSen Password: % Error in authentication.

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 13- Task 13-9 and Task 13-10 (interrelated)

Can someone clarify please? Task 13-9 of LAB 13 Vol 1, DSG page 325, says the loopbacks locally configured and advertised in BGP AS 10101 should appear in other ASs as if they had passed through AS 1  ,  11222 , 11333 and 11444. Actually that requirement is implemented on page 327, DSG.

[OSL | CCIE_RS] 3 sub-ASs? How come? - LAB 13- Vol 1- Task 13-2

Guys, I still do not see how and why we need 3 sub-ASs in the confederation 109. I would assume 2 should be enough. The first between R2 and R4 and the second between R5 and R6. DSG page 316, Task 13-2, paragraph 3 talks about upcoming requirements that will force us to have 3 sub-ASs. Which

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Route-map Task9 is used but is not defined anywhere.... - Task 13-12 LAB 13- Vol 1

Guys, Can someone jump on this and comment please ? The Route-map Task9 is invoked on Cat1 (see DSG page 327), but I do not see it defined anywhere. I would assume at one point that route-map is defined via a Neighbor command [before being used] and pointing to R8 and R4 since Cat1 peers with

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 10-Vol 1 Task 10-9, Task 10-11 and Task 10-13

Hi, Task 10-9 and Task 10-11 DSG is making R4 ethernet interfaces F0/1 and F0/0 passive-interfaces  (see Task 10-5, DSG page 258). I am assuming this is due to the fact, none is speaking OSPF through these ethernet interfaces. Can someone confirm this assumption?  DSG is NOT making R9

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 8 - Vol 1- Task 8-8 - RIP Authentication

Hi, I understand the need to change the R2 s0/1/0 and R4 settings to accomodate the several authentication keys for RIP. 1- What I would like to understand is why we are making R2 S0/1/0.25 and s0/10/.26 multipoint interfaces. Could not we just make them point-to-point? 2- This is my setting

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 8- Vol 1 - Task 8-4 Static NAT or Port Static NAT ?

Can someone help clarify this task? Thanks B --- This is the DSG solution for this task. R7 int s0/1/0 ip nat outside !  ip nat outside source static udp  150.10.78.8 520  

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 8-7 LAB 8 - Vol 1

What about Cat3?  It  has port F0/5  in VLAN 2567 and potentially this VLAN could have RIP updates going accross just like Cat 4. Are reason why the VACL is not applied to this switch? Thanks   B ___ For more information regarding industry leading

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 7-4 Vol 1- LAB 7

Can someone confirm/clarify how were obtained the 2 subnets of /29  in Task 7-4, Page 198, DSG? These are the subnets I obtain after subdividing 150.100.100.0/24. Subnet 1- 150.100.0.0/29 - Subnet 64- 150.100.0.64/29

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 6- Vol 1- Task 6-12

Guys, Do I need the clockrate set in Task 6-12 for a link with frame-relay encap? I see that setting when configuring serial lines Thanks B __ Connect with friends from any web browser - no download required. Try the

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 5- Vol 1 Task 5-6

Guys, This is about  l2protocol-Tunneling... When a VLAN is causing the following error: % PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: L2ptguard error detected on FaX/Y, putting the interface  FaX/Y in errdisable state... How someone can pinpoint what is the VLAN to be removed ? In this task it is said VLAN 12 is the

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 6 - Vol 1 Tasks 6-13 and Task 6-17

Hi Guys, Can someone assist please? Task 6-13: DSG page 177. Is R9  MFR config missing? I see R6 config and  I am assuming R9 should have a similar setting... Task 6-17: DSG page 184. I assuming the config under int s0/0/0 is for R4 and not R2. Correct? Also, the DSG states that the map

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 5 - Vol1- Task 5-2

 Any help is highly appreciated. Why do we have system mtu 1508 instead of system mtu 1504? Why an alternative setting of MTU 1508 would require changes in the Routers interfaces to MTU 1496 in the Routers (in case  system MTU MTU command is not allowed on the Swithes) ?  Why not change the

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 5 - Vol 1- Task 5-7

Task 5-7 Instead of G0/1 could we use Fa/24 as the 802.1Q Tunneling trunk between Cat1 and Cat2 ? Or even better, to trunk between Cat4 and Cat3,  could I use G0/1 between Cat 4 and Cat3 instead of going Cat4=Cat1= Cat2=Cat3 ? Thanks Bauke

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 3- Vol 1 - Task 3-22

Guys, In Task 3-22, I can see specific VLANs being selected and associated with specific trunks as Native Vlans in that particular trunk. Q1- What is the reasoning behing this assignment ? Is up to me to pick choose any vlan to be native on a particular Trunk or is there any 'logic' ? Q2-

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 2-28 - LAB 2- Vol 1

Team, Can someone comment on this? It seems the following config.  instances are missing from the DSG in this task: interface range F0/6-7 switchport mode private-vlan community switchport private-vlan mapping 2000 add 2002 interface range F0/8-10 switchport mode private-vlan isolated

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 2 Vol 1- Task 2-11

 Hello, Are these 2 commands equivalent? Task 2-11   Cat2  dot1x test eapol-capable interface F0/18    OR Interface F0/18 switchport mode access authentication port-control AUTO     Thanks     B. __ Make

Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Lab 9 Task 1.2

Joe/Rob I struggled with this task for days... The only way I found was to configure router-in-a-stick feature. I am curious to learn any other way of doing it. Regards Bauke  From: Joe Astorino jastor...@ipexpert.com To: Rob Simmons rob...@gmail.com Cc:

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 6-2 LAB 9 Vol 2

Team,  Task 6-2 LAB 9  Vol 2 I understand R1 has to allow ntp queries from R2 and that is why we have the ACL 123. But why are we applying this ACL on R1-F0/1 interface? Only R1-F0/0 talks to R2 and the ACL should only be applied to this interface. F0/1 talks to nowhere... Also I

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 3-2 - Vol 2- LAB 9

Hello, Can someone comment on the config that appears in DSG regarding connectivity between R5, R6 and R7 on VLAN 56 and VLAN 76? Doing exactly the way is shown in DSG I have no connectivity between these 3 devices. R6 - Int F0/0 is talking to R5 on VLAN 56 and talking to R7 on VLAN 76 via a

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 6-2, Vol 2- LAB 9.

Team, 1-  ACL 124 I have a question regarding the need for the ACL 124 under R2, in Task 6-2, Vol 2- LAB 9. Do we need this ACL on R2 regulating ntp traffic coming from R1 to R2. Would be there any problem if that ACL was not there? 2- I understand the need for the command below on R2, R4,

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 9- Vol2- Task 3-1

Guys, Can someone clarify the following: 1- The requirements in this task exclude the use of summary-address under R9, but DSG shows it anyway. 2- The stub route config comes with the additional keyword summary and connected. Why do we need those? By default, eigrp stub command, by itself, 

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 9 - Vol2 - Task 1-5 ---- Port-channel Load balancing issues.

Can someone help clarify? I am confused about the solution presented in the DSG for this task. For this scenario where we have a switch [Cat4] connected to a router [R9],  DSG uses src-dst-ip based load-balancing. Since we are configuring load-balancing in the Cat4, I would expect to be src-ip

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 8 Vol 2- Task 7-4

Team, ntp broadcast command should be under R1 F0/0 since this interface is the one belonging to VLANA  in  the topology diagram 8A... In the DSG solution the command shows up under R1 F0/1.. Any comments? B __ Be

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 8 - Vol 2- Task 9-2

Can someone help explain why this warning from Router8  is showing up after adjusting the bandwidth? By the way this is the same config. showed in the DSG... Thanks B. --- R8 #interface F0/1  

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 7- Vol 2- Task 9-3 and 9-4

Team, The solution in DSG of the Tasks mentioned above are missing... Could someone take a look and advise? Thanks Bauke  __ Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer® 8. Optimized for

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 3-7 Lab 7-Vol2 ...showing up in BW but MIA in DSG!!!

Team, Could someone take a look at this Task in DSG and advise?. It seems the task went MIA in DSG ! Regards Bauke __ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 7 - Vol 2- several Tasks ...

Team, Could someone comment/clarify on this? Task 1-2 I would expect #exec-timeout 0 0 command, both under Line vty 0 15 and Line con 0 for the no-timeout session requirement. Task 1-3 I would expect #vtp version 2 at least under the server (Cat1) as required. Task 2-1 I would expect

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 7- Vol2 - Task 3-6

Team, Where should the following command be applied in an NSSA area? Router ospf 1 area 78 nssa default-information-originate My understanding is that this command should be under the ABR of a NSSA area (since this ABR, by default, does not generate/advertise a 0/0 into NSSA). In Task 3-6, R7

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Redistribution : Open question

Team, Say I have a router where one interface is running 2 protocols. When it comes to redistribution, does it make sense to redistribute between the 2 protocols in the same router? The most  close example of what I am trying to understand is R4, LAB 7-Vol2. Even though the DSG does not

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 7 - Vol2- Task 1-2 DSG

Configure your telnet sessions so that sessions nevr timeout. It seems that requirement is missing from the DSG... Should not we have to include this as well? Line vtp 0 15 (.ommited...) exec-timeout 0 0     Thanks     Bauke   Line con 0

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB- Vol2-Task 1-4 DSG

What about the following requirement in this task:  ...ALL the even numbered switches, should not try to set-up this negotiation I would expect this  to imply the following:   Cat1 interface range F0/23-24 channel-protocol LACP channel-group 12 mode active Cat2 interface range F0/23-24

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 8-3 Vol2 LAB 6 DSG

Team, How does someone set interface to null0?   I am enabling policy based routing  (PBR) in F0/0, R4. From the sample below, it looks like IOS does not accept it.. Any ideas?   R4(config-route-map)#set interface null0 %Warning:Use P2P interface for routemap set     interface

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 8-3 Vol2 LAB 6 DSG

PBR route-map PBR, permit, sequence 10   Match clauses:     ip address (access-lists): 123     length 400 600   Set clauses:     interface Null0 FastEthernet0/0   Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes R4#     Thanks     B. --- On Sun, 1/17/10, Bauke Dzavhale bauke_ipexpert_c...@yahoo.com wrote

[OSL | CCIE_RS] standby 1 authentication md5 key-chain key

  Team, Some clarification is appreciated   Do we need the command below when configuring authentication with standby ?   interface xxx standby 1 authentication md5 key-chain key   The command shows up in CLI but it does not give a suggestion of any parametrs. Watch below: 

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 6- Vol 2 DSG- Task 6-1

Team,   Based on the requirements of the problem I am assuming the config under R6 should be under R5 and vice-versa   Any thoughts? B __ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 6, Vol 2 DSG - Task 1-3

  In LAB 6, Task 1-3, there is a requirement for the following:   EtherChannel ports should be statically in trunking Mode.   My answer would be to run the following command: #switchport mode trunk. This command [manually=statically] sets the port to trunk unconditionally. Ans this has been the

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 6- Vol 2- Task 1-5

  In this task, only Cat3 and Cat 4 have ports belonging to VLAN56. Cat1 and Cat2 have no exposure to vlan 56 (no ports assigned to VLAN 56 in these switches). So, why is it that the command below is extensive to these switches as well?   Cat1# mac address-table aging-time 3600 vlan 56   Cat2#

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 6 - Vol 2- Task 2-2 DSG

Team,   It seems to me the command #frame-relay broadcast-queue 500 1 100, should be  #frame-relay broadcast-queue 500 5000 1. Is this a typo?   Thanks     Bauke __ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 6- Vol 2- Task 2-2 DSG

Team,     I have 2 questions here:   Question1: I would expect the config on R6 and R9 for the multilink PPP to look somehow like below. However, on both R6 and R9 part of config commands seem like missing... R6 interface Mul1 ip add 150.50.96.6   255.255.255.0 ppp multilink group1 ppp

[OSL | CCIE_RS] EEM configurations-Can someone help with the right URL?

Team,   I have this link for EEM within Network Management, followed by the sub-title: Embedded Event Manager Overview. My issue is other than the concepts about EEM, I can not see the configs.   http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/netmgmt/configuration/guide/12_4/nm_12_4_book.pdf What I do not

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB5- Vol2- Task 2-1 DSG - @ R2 : Frame-relay List # ...missing ?

  Team,   This one seems like missing on R2, Task 2-1, LAB 5-Vol2-DSG  #frame-relay de-list 1 protocol ip gt 512   Thanks   B. __ Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share

[OSL | CCIE_RS] ip addressing @ R6 and R9, Task 2-2 LAB5- Vol2 DSG...

Team,   Can someone help clarify the ip add assignment on R6 and R9, Task 2-2 LAB5- Vol2 DSG?   We are give the subnet 172.16.69.0/30 to be used and we have 4 interfaces (s0/2/0, s0/2/1) on both R6 and R9. This is my understanding:   1- The subnet gives us 4 ip addresses: 172.16.69.0,

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB5-Task 2-4, Vol2 DSG: #No keep missing ?

Team, What about this one?   I would include #no keep  on R2 and R5 since this is a serial link and there is no Frame-relay switch in between.  Any thoughts ? Thanks   B. __ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Please ignore the posting regarding LAB 5 - Vol2- DSG- Task 1-1

--- On Mon, 12/28/09, Bauke Dzavhale bauke_ipexpert_c...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Bauke Dzavhale bauke_ipexpert_c...@yahoo.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 5 - Vol2- DSG- Task 1-1 To: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Received: Monday, December 28, 2009, 10:43 PM Team,   OK, this is basic

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB5- Vol2- Task 1-2 - Cat-2 should be seen as the root.

Team,   It seems to me this one is missing from the config in the DSG?   #spanning-tree mst 0 vlan 1, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 root primary Could someone comment on this one ?     Thanks   B. __ Be smarter than spam. See how

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB4-Vol2-DSG- Issues with Redistribution of OSPF = EIGRP at R6

Team, OK, I know I am taking a risk here...voicing my frustration...but am giving up for today...I can not figure it out why R6 after receiving routes from OSPF domain, does not pass these routes on to EIGRP domain. Below is a snapshot of the config (including redistribution) but for now I

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 8-2 LAB 4- Vol2

When using ACLs to classify ICMP traffic an ACL was created as follows: access-list 110 permit icmp any any.   For telnet the ACL was set up as follows: access-list 111 permit TCP any any eq 23 access-list 111 permit TCP any  eq 23 any I understand the telnet ACL but I have a problem with icmp...

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 4-1, LAB 4- Vol2. DSG

Team,       Question : Task 4-1, LAB 4- Vol2. We are told you can not change the settings in a CCIE LAB. To be able to solve this problem, either we configure a confederation with AS 2456 and AS 78 as Sub-As (not allowed), or we use the neighbor x.x.x.x options command, with options being

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 4-1 LAB 4- Vol 2 DSG

 Team, 1- The private  AS 65078 assigned to R7 via  neighbor x.x.x.x local-as  65078   command is removed at R2 before traffic exits AS 2456 [to enter AS 100 via R1] because private ASs just like private ip addresses can not be publically routed. Is my conclusion correct? Otherwise we could

[OSL | CCIE_RS] (no subject)

Team, Can __ Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to New Mail today or register for free at

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Bi-directional Traffic...

Team,   Can someone explain to me how is it that, being asked to deny inbound www traffic on  R8 Ethernet segment, [LAB 3, Vol 2 DSG page 116 ], we end up with the following config for the ACL:   ip access-list extended IPEXPERT   deny tcp any any eq www   deny tcp any eq www any   permit ip any

[OSL | CCIE_RS] From % to Byte-count...Task 8-1 LAB3 Vol2 DSG, page 110

Team, Can someone explain  [since the solution guide is not clear], how one goes from a % of relative bandwidth level to equivalent byte-count? Please refer to the Task 8-1 LAB3 Vol2 DSG, page 110     Thanks B. __ The new

Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] NTP issues...

...@ipexpert.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] NTP issues... To: Bauke Dzavhale bauke_ipexpert_c...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Received: Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 12:14 AM Here is the skinny, 1 -- ntp trusted-key key  You NEED this on the client for sure.  In OLD IOS versions you did

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB3-Vol 2- Task 7-1 DSG (ipv4/ipv6 address on int vlan 10, 20, 30)- Page 47

Team, This is the final config of Cat2, Cat3 ipv4/ipv6 addresses Why is it that the last octect of ipv4 address is different from the last 16-digit of ipv6 address? In both address types, the diagram shows the same number for the last 8-digit (ipv4) / 16-digit (ipv6)  address  value...   

[OSL | CCIE_RS] NTP issues...

Team,   The Tasks below, have the same requirement but the configs are done differently...are they equivalent?  Here is what confuses me the most: 1- #ntp trusted-key key . I thought this command MUST always be included in the client side whenever you config authntication. Nop, as shwed in LAB

Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] QoS__Workbook_Vol_1

Guys, More into this subject... Is not enough to go through QOS documentation in cisco.com ( Cisco IOS Quality of Service Solutions Configuration Guide, Release 12.4) from A to Z ? Bauke --- On Fri, 12/11/09, Bryan Bartik bbar...@ipexpert.com wrote: From: Bryan Bartik bbar...@ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 3-5 LAB 3- Vol 2 DSG

Team, R8 does NOT learn routes from BB3 via Cat 4  (int vlan 50 - 110.99.200.40) even after twicking the distance (metric) on R8 and disabling split-horizon on Cat4. Any thoughts?   R8   router rip  version 2  network 110.0.0.0  distance 255  distance 120 110.99.200.40 0.0.0.0  no auto-summary

[OSL | CCIE_RS] set dampening not supported...

Team, Any idea for this error message in red ? Thanks Bauke. -- R5 router bgp 620 bgp dampening route-map DAMP route-map DAMP set dampening 15 1500 5000 45 % DAMP used as BGP outbound route-map, set dampening not supported

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 2- Vol 2- DSG - Task 6-6 ; LAB 3- Vol 2- DSG- Task 3-6

Team,   Can someone clarify the follow on Task 6-6, Vol2 DSG - LAB 2, page 72.   R2# Router RIP Redistribute ospf 12 metric 1 match internal route-map O2R. What is the meaning of the keyword match internal when redistributing into RIP and where in the LAB  is that specifically required to use

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Volume 2 DSG, LAB 2 - BGP diagram and Task 7-7

Team,   1- I am wondering if R4, R5, R6 in the sub-autonomous system 620 should not be either fully meshed (the bgp set up shows they are not...), or R4 should be configured as Route-Reflector (RRs). I am recalling the rule which says, either iBGP members are fully meshed, or then RRs should be

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Add loopbacks to protocol X as deemed necessary- LAB2, Vol 2- CCIE RS DSG

Team,   I am having trouble understanding the reasoning behind how to advertise loopbacks  in  multiprotocol routers Task 4-1 (RIP), Task  5-1 (EIGRP), Task 6-1 (OSPF). One would think the procedure would be to follow what has been said in page 67 (Task 5-1). Loopback interfaces are best

[OSL | CCIE_RS] RS Vol 2- DSG Task 5-3 and Task 8-1

Hi,   Two questions I would like clarified. Task 5-3: What is the reasoning behing the BW command? And why is it 1000? Task 8-1: Where is the ACL 10, referred in the ip nat inside source list 10 ... command? As always your assistance is highly appreciated.   Thanks B.

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Clarification on RS_Vol2_DSG_v11.o_Lab1 - Task 4-1 Task 5-1

    Hello, I am a bit confused about these 2 Tasks. I am talking  about loopback interface advertisements. In Task 4-1,  R6 loopback must be advertised in OSPF area 0. In Task 5-1, R6 loopback must be advertised in EIGRP 69 (add all interfaces...). My question is: can we have one

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Vtp config revision # mismatch...

Basic question Team: I am using Cat1 (server) and Cat2 (client) for my LAB. They can not synch the config revision #. This emans I can never get my VLANs created on Cat1 to be advertised to Cat2. Did everything, rebooted the devices, powercycled them, no help. After rebooting, they both come

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 13 - Task 14-4 Volome 2

At 1 point in this task is said:   You should receive 3 routes from BB2.   Well, this is what I get at R8:   R8#Sh ip route I inc 192.168.80.100 R    208.10.88.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.80.100, 00:00:18, FastEthernet0/0 R    208.10.89.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.80.100, 00:00:18, FastEthernet0/0 R   

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Task 5-2 Vol 2- LAB 13

Quick and simple question: What is the role of no keepalive command on Task 5-2 Vol 2- LAB 13 ? Thanks   Bauke __ Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail.

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Lab 13, Vol2, Tash 4-4 (PG page 494)

Team, Can someone help clarify the PG solution of the Task 4-4 Lab 13, Volume 2 ? Make sure the 192.168.80.33/27 subnet is not in the routing table of any of the routers except BB2. It seems to me the solution does not allow R8 to advertise this subnet to any other router  out of  s0/0/0 as

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 13- Vol 2- Task 1-1

Why is it that in this case, the keyword LOGIN is ommited from the VTY Lines config? Comparing this question with the same question in LAB 12 Vol 2, LAB 11 Vol 2, ...etc, the keyword Login is always there... Line vty 0 15 password password Login   Thanks B.

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 12- Vol 2 - Task 5-1

  Team,   Could someone comment on this please? I am surprised here with the behaviour of R2 when advertising routes to R4. Can someone see something I am missing here? This is the RT at R4. The serial link between R2 and R5 and the ethernet link between R2 and R1 should not show up in

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 12- Vol 2 - Task 5-1

Team, I am surprised here with the behaviour of R2 when advertising routes to R4. Can someone see something I am missing here? This is the RT at R4. The serial link between R2 and R5 and the ethernet link between R2 and R1 should not show up in the RT of R4. 172.31.0.0/16 is variably

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 11- Vol2- Task 8-2

Team,   Static routes missing on R8 ? Thanks   B. __ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 11 - Vol 2- Reachability Issue....2 PVCs on Task 3-3

Team,     Having finished LAB 11 - volume 2, went through the ritual of testing my end-2-end reachability. I came accross some interesting issues. The PVCs between R7 and R8 (task 3-3) are not reachable from anywhere in the network (of course except from R7 and R8).    No redistribution  or

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 11-Volume 2- Task 4-3:

Team,   Questions about LAB 11-Volume 2- Task 4-3: 1- Without being asked to not to send ospf updates to Loopbacks, the solution shows all loopbacks in R2, R5, R6 and R advertised in OSPF (this was asked), but made passive-interfaces (this was not explicitly asked). Is this a sort of best

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 11 - Task 5-1 and Task 6-1

Team,   My question here is the similar to the one I posted about Loopbacks in OSPF (see my earlier posting regarding LAB 11 - Task 4-3). Then, [Task 4-3], loopbacks advertised in OSPF were made passive. In Task 5-1, Loopbacks advertised in EIGRP were not made passive. In Task 6-1, Loopback

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Lab 12- Vol 2- Task 11-1

Team,   After configuring security on R7, I can no longer ping R8 interface Lo1 (200.0.0.8) from anywhere in the network. The relevant ACL config is as follows:   R7#   # ip access-list extended IPEXPERT    deny   tcp 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.31 any eq www log      ... truncated

Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 11 - Vol 2- Task 7 -1

I can/t see why weneed to include redistribute connected in the redistribution?  When injecting OSPF routes into RIP, which interface is connected ?   When injecting RIP routes into OSPF, which interface is connected ?   Thanks   B.

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 9 - Vol2- Task 8-1 (PG Page 359)

Team,   some clarification here is highly appreciated...   With CAR these are the formulas to use.   Bc= (CIR/8) * 1.5 Be= 2* Bc   They do NOT seem like adding up to the values I see in this Task resolution. Also, where does the CIR = 1 000 000 bps come from?     Thanks Bauke 

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 9- Vol 2- Task 6-2

Guys,   This is one of these cases where I am always at lost. How do I figure it out in direction shpould I apply my policy? Is there any tricky so see this once for all since it looks like these questions are made in souch a way one is left guessing?   Thanks     Bauke

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 10-Vol 2- Task 3-2 [see also LAB 8 - vol 2 Task 2-2]

Team, Two questions regarding this task:   1- Instead of using #frame-relay interface-dlci 69, under the #int mfr1 69, could we use frame-relay map ip x.x.x.x 69 brodcast?   2- Because we have no real Frame-Relay switch, the solution uses the command frame-relay intf-type dce in R9 to simulate

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Section 9- Vol 2 - Task 3-4 Offset-list in Rip config

Team, Cat1 router rip offset-list 0 3 in port-channel 12 ! Cat2 router rip offset-list 0 3 in port-channel 24   What is the need for the second offset-list on Cat2? I thought the offset-list on Cat1 would be enough to fullfil the requirements for the task. Thanks     Bauke  

Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Section 9- Vol 2 - Task 3-6 Redistribution

 Team, what about this one ?   1- It seems to me the ACL 35 on R5 and R8 misses the subnet 140.10.113.0 between Cat1 and Cat3. Any reason why is not there?   2- The  ACL under RIP references the next-hop of  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 (basically any router). I thought this approach was only

[OSL | CCIE_RS] section 8 - Vol 2 - Task 3-1

At one point in the requirements of the task, we are told not to use distribute-lists or summary-address. The solution shows a summary-address configured in R9 and advertised via EIGRP. Is not this a contradiction? Am I missing something here?   Thanks   Bauke  

[OSL | CCIE_RS] Fw: Re: LAB 8 - Revision # not in synch...

--- On Sat, 5/30/09, Bauke Dzavhale bauke_ipexpert_c...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Bauke Dzavhale bauke_ipexpert_c...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 8 - Revision # not in synch... To: Bryan Bartik bbar...@ipexpert.com Received: Saturday, May 30, 2009, 1:20 PM  Team, need some

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 8 - Vol 2 - Task 7-2 (RIPng Config).

  Team,   1- Why in this task the RIP process is NOT enabled in global config mode [ Ipv6 Router RIP CCIE], but only under the interface?   2- When filtering updates from R6 using the traffic-filter command under R5 router mode, why are we calling the ACL BLOCK6 to block loopback1 of R6 and R9?

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 8 Vol 2 - Task 6-4 (NTP Authentication)

Team, Some clarification here would be very much appreciated. 1- Why these 2 commands are missing when configuring authentication:   #NTP authenticate  ! enable authentication NTP trusted-key 1 ! set the key to be exchanged in the NTP packets   2- What is the role of the second instance of 

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 8- Vol 2- Task 4-2 (BGP config)

 Team,   I would appreciate some help and validation to some of my thoughs with this task. 1- Validation: The first route, 72.164.224.0 could alternatively be advertised  by R1 to R2 with a community of no-export through a route-map. Ex. R1 router bgp 1 redistribute static route-map

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 7 Vol 2- Task 7-2

Team,   The routes 10.12.1.0, 10.12.20, 10.12.3.0 have been created in R2 and advertised by BGP throughout the network. The idea is to make R8 deny the subnet 10.12.1.0 in its routing table. Below you can see a snapshot of the config at R8the problem is that R8 still has the route in its

Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 7, vol 2, Task 5-4 - Redistribution

 Team,     Few things I would appreciate help on...   1- There is no way to have connectivity end-to-end from and to R4. I am sure the problem is on redistributing connected and Ospf to Rip  on   R2. Did exactly as recommened in the PG , page 258, 259 but no success. Even after redistribution,

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 7, vol 2, Task 8-1

Group,   The following command tracks the state of a Cisco IOS IP Service Level Agreements (SLAs) operation, as per cisco.com. # track object-number rtr operation-number {state | reachability}   As per the task mentioned above, PG page 268 the command is: #track object-number rtr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Where To Find BGP Path Preference On The Doc CD

Robert, Check the following doc from cisco.com:http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094431.shtml Hope that helps.|Bauke --- On Sat, 5/16/09, Robert S Wyzykowski bob...@imerys.com wrote: From: Robert S Wyzykowski bob...@imerys.comSubject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Where

[OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 7 vol2 Task 2-1

  Task 2-2 This is the solution in the PG. (The ip address is under the main interface, s0/1/0). int s0/1/0 sh encap frame no frame inverse ip add 172.29.24.2   255.255.255.0 int s0/1/0.24 point-to-point frame interface-dlci 204   interface s0/1/0.26 multipoint   (truncated)