Hi,
You need IP Services on 12.2(50)SE or later. Up to that point you used to
need Advanced IP Services but that feature set is EOS/EOL and got collapsed
into IP Services. In your case you're on 12.2(40) which introduced EIGRPv6
but running the wrong feature set.
HTH
Kaj
AIS was required until 12.2(50)SE. After that it's all IP Services. :-)
Please refer to
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps9703/product_bu
lletin_c25-523873_ps5012_Products_Bulletin.html
HTH
Kaj
-Original Message-
From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
AFAIR the 64 VLAN limitation applies only if you're not using MST.
Kaj
From: Rick Mur r...@ipexpert.com
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:18:59 -0700
To: Aung Phyo Lwin aungphyol...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] so why 2950 supports 64 vlans?
And for
Redesign your IGP using OSPF or ISIS instead of EIGRP to begin with. EIGRP
is supported as a PE-CE routing protocol only.
Kaj
From: Taqdir Singh singh.taq...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:33:29 -0700
To: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] not getting vpn route in
Only way to learn to troubleshoot is to ... Troubleshoot. Configure
something, screw up, figure out why it broke, fix it, learn. Extra
educational experience for doing within a maintenance window with a bunch of
project managers behind your back. Nothing beats the real world. Really.
Kaj
It was attached at least to OSL fine.
Kaj
From: Joe Astorino jastor...@ipexpert.com
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:52:05 -0700
To: Cisco certification ccie...@groupstudy.com, ccie_rs
ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My CCIE RS Templates
I have been getting a ton of
Sep 2009 13:01:40 -0700
To: Kaj Niemi kaj...@a51.org
Cc: Joe Astorino jastor...@ipexpert.com, ccie_rs
ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com, Cisco certification ccie...@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My CCIE RS Templates
Question to anyone who can give a little insight..when labs or even
Hi,
Is the next-hop in the routing table and pointing towards the DSL interface?
If the NH isn't in the routing table the router will forward the packet
normally. Recursive NH resolution is available in 12.3(..)T or later and you
can set that with set ip next-hop ... recursive.
That said, I
1.1.1.1 is the correct
one; I had recursive after the address not before)
Kaj
From: Kim Pedersen k.jun...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:34:44 -0700
To: Kaj Niemi kaj...@a51.org
Cc: Tahir Bashir bashirta...@hotmail.com, CCIE RS_FORUM
ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL
Hi,
It's originally really a dial technology. Virtual templates are used when
you want to apply a bunch of common things to users logging in _or_ request
settings via AAA for per-user settings. Basically you can apply policers,
qos, acls, routes, VRF, etc. for each user individually. It's really
There isn't any real limit on the stack itself I believe. What matters is
sometimes how deep your equipment is able to look at the stack and at what
cost - on some (especially hardware) platforms this requires that the frame
is recirculated into the forwarding engine complex which effectively
The port is in routed mode and any layer 2 switching features are disabled
on it. :)
SW6-LAB2(config-if)#do sh int gi0/12 sw
Name: Gi0/12
Switchport: Disabled
SW6-LAB2(config-if)#do sh run int gi0/12
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 86 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/12
no
One can skip all that stuff with masks by using ip ospf .. area .. under
the interface configuration. Makes the configuration much more readable,
too.
In RS it'll be available on 12.4M, recent 12.2SE (40 or 44 and above IIRC)
and obviously in 12.4T so on everything for 4.0.
Obviously it will
You're confusing no service password-encryption with no service
password-recovery. :-) The latter prevents anyone attempting to interrupt
the boot process to access the configuration.
Kaj
From: Rick Mur r...@ipexpert.com
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:30:57 -0700
To: Adrian Brayton
FWIW it works (and I've used it) on routers , too, not just cats.
Kaj :)
From: Kaj Niemi kaj...@a51.org
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:53:38 -0700
To: Rick Mur r...@ipexpert.com
Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com, kewl code kewlc...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] no service password
If you need to have one vlan be a member on several interfaces use a SVI.
The routed port behaves similarly as the Fe0/0 port on, say, a 1841.
Example:
Let's say you have a 7600 somewhere and a bunch of access switches hanging
off it on different ports (Gi 2/1, Gi 2/2, Gi 2/3, ...). On the
Note that STP in your sentence means PVST or RPVST which both are Ciscoisms.
:) MST will use the native vlan.
Kaj
From: Kim Pedersen k.jun...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:16:24 -0700
To: Wouter Prins w...@null0.nl
Cc: Online Study List ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL
tree... IST is also the only one actually sends/receives BPDUs the instance
configuration can be found within the MST BPDUs themselves.
:)
Kaj
cc: the list
From: Kim Pedersen k.jun...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:15:26 -0700
To: Kaj Niemi kaj...@a51.org
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS
Hi,
1. Either side can and typically will attempt to form a connection. The
connection setup by the speaker with the higher bgp identifier will be kept.
Check out RFC 4271, it's in there.
In IOS you can prevent one side to initiate the connection using neighbor
transport connection-mode passive
Hi,
Just to add to this.. what you are seeing is the established session between
two routers. In reality (and by default) both routers will be listening on
port 179 - you'll see that with show tcp brief all numeric. If you're
really interested in the connection you can check it out with show tcp
Not necessarily.. In most implementations the originating port is allocated
from the dynamic range of ports (typically 16K-32K). Obviously the most
important thing is the destination port as that's what the
process/thread/etc. responsible for handling bgp listens on.
In IOS you can see the
To influence traffic you originate towards your upstream you can do it by
preferring received prefixes with weight (local to the router), local
preference (local to your asn), as path, med among other things. Obviously
communities to set any of the above will work too assuming you guys pass
lan is slow the problem is typically bad cabling, duplex, serious
oversubscribing of trunks, facist qos, etc. Relatively easy to troubleshoot
assuming you have managed switches.
network is slow the problem is typically all the lan is slow stuff along
with oversubscribing of wan links, facist
Assuming you want to have Layer 3 all the way to your remote sites I'd
extend area 0 all the way there. No sense creating other areas unless you
really have to. The SUP720, RSP720, Sup6, etc. are pretty good and solid
stuff cpu wise.
If you're going to be 500 prefixes in your igp with that amount
Again ymmv but I wouldn't deploy eigrp unless you're sure you're always
going to be a vendor c shop. Changing igp later on is a pain the bigger the
network gets. Summarization is also something that I'd be careful with
deploying - if I'd exceed n amount of prefixes in my igp I'd rather start
You're running IP feature set (i) while you need IP Plus (is). IIRC
802.1Q support on 3640 came in 12.0T while ISL came in 11.3T. Quite a while
ago :-)
Kaj
From: Justin Guagliata jus...@ensgrp.com
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:28:05 -0700
To: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL |
engineering (again rsvp tunnels).
I would kindly suggest that you read through RFC 4364 with some thought. :)
CC: the list
Kaj
From: Bodnar, Edward edward.bod...@unisys.com
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:42:52 -0700
To: Kaj Niemi kaj...@a51.org
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] MPLS
Another
Hi,
Doesn't seem to be on the RS 4.0 lab blueprint but anything is fair game I
guess ;-) The blueprint disclaimer states other related topics may appear.
Kaj
From: Anthony Conway conway.anth...@hotmail.com
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:33:31 -0700
To: Online Study List
Hi,
I think you mean Bc = CIR (bits per second) * 1/8 (byte/bits) * 1.5 seconds.
;)
Kaj
From: prakash patel patelpr...@hotmail.com
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:10:49 -0700
To: ljan...@gmail.com, ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] qos question wb 1 v11 lab 22.1
CIR
Hi,
You're running 12.3M - what you need is 12.3(4)T or later. See
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-dhcp.html#w
p1055847
Also, FN is your friend although sometimes it is a bit inaccurate.
HTH
Kaj
From: Douglas Kuo douglas...@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 28 Jul
30 matches
Mail list logo
