Re: [ccp4bb] eLBOW aromatic restraints

2023-06-12 Thread Nigel Moriarty
Henry There is a PhenixBB that is more relevant to eLBOW questions but if you send me (directly) the inputs you used and tried, I can help you. Cheers Nigel --- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 33R0349, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA

Re: [ccp4bb] eLBOW aromatic restraints

2023-06-12 Thread Oliver Smart
Dear Henry, First of all, directly asking for help about eLBOW on the ccp4bb is a little bit impolite. It is a bit like asking a Nottingham Forest* fan about how Derby City* played on the weekend. Anyway this is my suggestion (as kind of a Leicester City* supporter). Directly asking any

Re: [ccp4bb] checkCIF alert

2023-06-12 Thread Harry Powell
Hi One small issue with Aaron’s answer - the alert specifically says “Not (SHELXL) Weight”, so I suspect that you may not be using SHELXL for your refinement, in which case the “OMIT” instructions may not be available or may take a slightly different form. There’s an open-access IUCr paper

Re: [ccp4bb] eLBOW aromatic restraints

2023-06-12 Thread Tomas Malinauskas
Hi Henry, You could try keeping selected atoms in the plane by manually editing restraints in the CIF. Set _chem_comp_plane_atom.dist_esd to something low. E.g. loop_ _chem_comp_plane_atom.comp_id _chem_comp_plane_atom.plane_id _chem_comp_plane_atom.atom_id _chem_comp_plane_atom.dist_esd

[ccp4bb] eLBOW aromatic restraints

2023-06-12 Thread Henry Padley
Hi all, I'm trying to generate a CIF file of an iridium piano stool complex ligand (Cp*Ir-Phenanthroline). Can Phenix eLBOW generate correctly restrained aromatic ring systems which stay flat in refinement? The phenanthroline bonds in the output CIF are listed as "aromatic" in the REEL text

Re: [ccp4bb] checkCIF alert

2023-06-12 Thread Aaron Finke
Hi Soheil, This usually means there are outliers in the reflection list that are affecting the weight parameter S that SHELXL uses. Use the OMIT instruction in your SHELXL .ins file to remove those ten disagreeable reflections, e.g. OMIT -1 -1 1 OMIT 1 0 1 etc. In addition, this tends to

Re: [ccp4bb] checkCIF alert

2023-06-12 Thread Aaron Finke
Hi Soheil, This usually means there are outliers in the reflection list that are affecting the weight parameter S that SHELXL uses. Use the OMIT instruction in your SHELXL .ins file to remove those ten disagreeable reflections, e.g. OMIT -1 -1 1 OMIT 1 0 1 etc. In addition, this tends to

[ccp4bb] checkCIF alert

2023-06-12 Thread Soheil Mahmoudi
Hi Everyone, I am preparing a cif file from an inorganic compound measured with X-ray, I get an unexpected error during chechCIF evaluation as below, Alert level A,PLAT939_ALERT_3_A Large Value of Not (SHELXL) Weight Optimized S .    1029.36 Check I check the disagreeable reflection and