I confirmed the bad one by removing the piggyback and the
failure returned. Now I need to desolder the bad one
without ruining the board. I may just cut the leads off
close to the bad chip, and solder the replacement to the
stumps. (Normally I remove the legs and install a
machine-pin DIP
On 06/11/2020 02:29 AM, Mattis Lind via cctalk wrote:
>/If that would be the case I think the system would fail />/quite soon rather
than on test 5. A guess is that this is />/a memory problem. /
That was a good guess, everyone ;) I got some new 4116's and piggybacked
(dry, no solder) two of
On 06/20/2020 04:20 AM, Peter Van Peborgh via cctech wrote:
Guys,
I now know it is an early CDC board. IT had C*NT*OLDATA on the reverse - how
I missed that must be attributed to old age. (Thanks Doug)
Here are shots of the back: https://photos.app.goo.gl/UPozyBB3zp7XYcP79
Ah, the missing
On 6/19/20 9:42 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
We need, or at least want, to handle BOTH.
Agreed.
Long-term, "permanent" content, as well as the casual "What is
this? here's what it looks like"
I think that short term can sort of ride the coat tales of the long term
solution.
I have
On 6/18/20 7:34 AM, Daniel Seagraves via cctalk wrote:
I vote we move the list to an Exchange server behind a SSL VPN
and mandate the use of Outlook, then force all messages to be in
quoted-printable encoding.
I see your quoted-printable and raise you TNEF.
This way nobody “wins” and
On 2020-06-19 23:42, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
>>> Images take up a lot of space and are best dealt with via links.
>
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2020, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>> Which rot over time.
>> If you're going to create a permanent archive, you need to archive any
>> attachments as well.
>>
On 2020-06-19 20:37, Chris Zach wrote:
> Yes, there was D and F, and F and G versions. Everything else was
> emulated slowly. Putt putt it was
Right! I have at least one of them. You know how one would see, which
one it is? Different board numbers?
> On 6/8/2020 3:26 PM, emanuel stiebler
Guys,
I now know it is an early CDC board. IT had C*NT*OLDATA on the reverse - how
I missed that must be attributed to old age. (Thanks Doug)
Here are shots of the back: https://photos.app.goo.gl/UPozyBB3zp7XYcP79
Any idea what the row of hole opposite the contacts were? Testing points?
But
I have some of these connectors (from ECS) for $10 each
Shipping in the US is a flat rate $8.30
(Poor) pictures at
http://bonedaddy.net/tgoodman/photos/tgoodman/ECS-Connector/
Todd
On 6/19/2020 5:19 PM, Vincent Slyngstad via cctalk wrote:
On 6/19/2020 12:24 PM, Robert Armstrong via cctalk
lördag 20 juni 2020 skrev Al Kossow via cctalk :
> On 6/20/20 2:36 AM, Mattis Lind via cctalk wrote:
>
> If anyone has a type 1 3174 that does BSC and SDLC so I could test my stuff
>> I would be very interested.
>>
>
> Dave Wade just posted that he had some in the UK he was interested in
>
On 6/20/20 2:36 AM, Mattis Lind via cctalk wrote:
If anyone has a type 1 3174 that does BSC and SDLC so I could test my stuff
I would be very interested.
Dave Wade just posted that he had some in the UK he was interested in getting
rid of.
Hello!
I have been working on interfacing the Hercules emulator with various real
terminals for some time. First project was an Alfaskop terminal cluster
which I connected using a small STM32 controller handling BSC.
Next is an Informer 213, portable 3178/3174 compatible terminal. It it
using
>Josh Dersch
> one half-height (used upside down).
Thanks, Josh - I hadn’t thought about using an extender card "backwards".
That's a good idea. Next question is "how many extender cards do I have?"...
Better go start digging.
In the meantime I did some more fooling around with
13 matches
Mail list logo
