On 9/30/2020 3:40 PM, Josh Dersch via cctalk wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:41 PM Gavin Scott via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
Josh wrote:
https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aqb36sqnCIfMpIVXm5draSrWHGMzJg
Would these potentially be the sense amp / comparators for the core? I
wonder if they were
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020, Glen Slick via cctalk wrote:
> Does anyone have a collection of Intel Developers' Insight CD-ROMs in
> physical form or as images? The only physical CD-ROMs I have are a two
> disk set from February 1998. I don't know what time period these were
> available. Maybe mid or late
Does anyone have a collection of Intel Developers' Insight CD-ROMs in
physical form or as images? The only physical CD-ROMs I have are a two
disk set from February 1998. I don't know what time period these were
available. Maybe mid or late 1990s to early 2000s? They have a variety
of information
> From: Liam Proven
> Would the x86-32 "reimplementation" of v6 UNIX be able to mount and/or
> read-write such filesystems?
No, it looks like it uses a different fie-system layout.
Besides; there's not much point: the big adantage of using V6 is that one can
use the V6 tool-chain to
Eric wrote:
> There was IBM APL\1130 version 2, introduced in 1969.
It's actually sorta annoying when you discover how much HP copied from
IBM in those days. The first giveaway is that APL\3000 has a backslash
in the product name when everything else was a forward slash as in
BASIC/3000,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:41 PM Gavin Scott via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Josh wrote:
> > https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aqb36sqnCIfMpIVXm5draSrWHGMzJg
>
> Would these potentially be the sense amp / comparators for the core? I
> wonder if they were anything like:
>
>
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 3:22 PM Gavin Scott via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> APL on the 3000 was a project started at HP Labs
> in Palo Alto in the early 1970s.
[...]
> This would be the first
> full APL implementation on a "small" (non-mainframe) computer.
>
There was IBM APL\1130
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 23:35, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
wrote:
>
> Good basic idea (using a different system to build on), but there's a
> better/easier approach (in the same basic vein): bring up V6, and mount the RK
> pack with Mini-Unix on it (it's a V6 file system, so is mountable); V6 is rock
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 6:11 PM Paul Koning via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> TIFF compression is lossless.
>
TIFF is only a container format ("Tagged Image File Format"). TIFF does not
define any one compression. It in fact can contain either lossy or lossless
compression, or even
Josh wrote:
> https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aqb36sqnCIfMpIVXm5draSrWHGMzJg
Would these potentially be the sense amp / comparators for the core? I
wonder if they were anything like:
https://datasheetspdf.com/pdf-file/1092342/Motorola/MC1711L/1
which might have a similar application and take +15 and -7 on
> From: Warner Losh
> If we can't use MINIUNIX to rebuild MINIUNIX kernel, should we try to
> bodge together rebuilding via apout?
Good basic idea (using a different system to build on), but there's a
better/easier approach (in the same basic vein): bring up V6, and mount the RK
pack
If we can't use MINIUNIX to rebuild MINIUNIX kernel, should we try to bodge
together rebuilding via apout? I have done some work there for 2.11BSD
stuff, but didn't need it for bootstrapping (just needed to use it to
bootstrap as).
Warner
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:09 PM Ray Jewhurst via cctalk <
Where would one find these images? I would like to get them working on
Simh.
Thanks
Ray
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020, 4:02 PM John Foust via cctalk
wrote:
> At 01:51 PM 9/30/2020, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> >I guess all this PDP-11 hardware detail isn't really on-topic for this
> list; I
> >should move it
The Motorola SC prefix means a custom or semicustom part. Good luck!
--
Will
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 4:05 PM Josh Dersch via cctalk
wrote:
>
> I'm in the middle of working out the pinout for the power supply connector
> on the MDP-1000. I'm aided somewhat by a set of test points on the
>
I'm in the middle of working out the pinout for the power supply connector
on the MDP-1000. I'm aided somewhat by a set of test points on the
backplane, unfortunately the "+" and "-" symbols (in the solder mask labels
next to the test points) are nearly indiscernible, so I'm trying to verify
that
At 01:51 PM 9/30/2020, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>I guess all this PDP-11 hardware detail isn't really on-topic for this list; I
>should move it to Classic Computers, or something.
I've got Riordan's udis[01..10].DSK disk images that I presume
are similar to
wrong probably my crippled hands... so there wise ass!
In a message dated 9/30/2020 12:27:59 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
ge...@deltasoft.com writes: On Wed, 30 Sep 2020, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
> http://www.smecc.org/motolola_government.htm IS URL DO NOT KNOW WHERE
>
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
http://www.smecc.org/motolola_government.htm IS URL DO NOT KNOW WHERE
EXTRA LETTER CAME FROM
IT COMES FROM THAT GARBAGE FIRE OF AN EMAIL PROGRAM YOU INSIST ON USING!
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The
I just spoke to Jerome on the phone a few days ago. He just doesn't
answer emails!
I will be going to his house sometime in the near future, is there a
message?
cheers,
Nigel
Nigel Johnson, MSc., MIEEE, VE3ID/G4AJQ/VA3MCU
Amateur Radio, the origin of the open-source concept!
Skype: TILBURY2591
On 9/30/2020 6:41 AM, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
I have a vintage computer sitting in the LA USPS since 9/17,
Bill,
I'm in Orange County, and items are moving in and out here (south of
LA). But they are all very small bubble pack and express mail type stuff.
Sorry to hear of your
http://www.smecc.org/motolola_government.htm IS URL DO NOT KNOW WHERE
EXTRA LETTER CAME FROM
her is the Motorola hi speed teleprinter and this is a little calc
device pretty neatMotorola Military Electronics Division, Chicago Center
1450 Cicero Avenue Chicago 51 Illinois.
(Ed Groth Collection at SMECC) "http://www.smecc.org/motolo3.gif" thanks ed#
On 30/09/2020 18:40, Josh Dersch via cctalk wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 5:20 AM ED SHARPE via cctalk
wrote:
whats the story on this...i see items but no pix. also check
your spelling on Motorola; Instrmentation and Control, Inc. that is in
the index. let me now if there
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 5:20 AM ED SHARPE via cctalk
wrote:
> whats the story on this...i see items but no pix. also check
> your spelling on Motorola; Instrmentation and Control, Inc. that is in
> the index. let me now if there is a photo group for this at least
> with the
Anyone know if Jerome Fine is still around and/or a good email address?
USPS (and UPS SurePost which is USPS last-mile-ish) have been delivering
on schedule or often ahead of schedule to here in the Chicagoland area over the
last month or so. USPS service has been excellent, with sometimes two
deliveries per day (regular mail and small packages and a separate overflow
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
It seems to depend on which postal hub an item is shipped through.
A few days ago, I received an item that was shipped USPS 3-day priority
that spent 10 days in Las Vegas (point of origin). All in all, it took
about 2 weeks to reach me here in
Seems like the western US is a lot worse off than anywhere else in the US
except maybe NYC.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:10 PM Chuck Guzis via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> It seems to depend on which postal hub an item is shipped through.
>
> A few days ago, I received an item that was
It seems to depend on which postal hub an item is shipped through.
A few days ago, I received an item that was shipped USPS 3-day priority
that spent 10 days in Las Vegas (point of origin). All in all, it took
about 2 weeks to reach me here in Oregon.
The USPS didn't say if the package was
Bill D wrote:
--
I have a vintage computer sitting in the LA USPS since 9/17, with no further
updates.
--
Just a few weeks ago I ordered a vintage fuel pump for an heirloom garden
tractor restoration I'm doing. It came from ohio via ebay, and I had a couple
phone conversations
> On Sep 30, 2020, at 9:41 AM, Bill Degnan via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> I have a vintage computer sitting in the LA USPS since 9/17, with no
> further updates. I have read in the local papers there that the entire
> post office has ground to a halt.
That sounds like creative writing.
Hi Bill,
I haven't seen any issues with USPS in LA. It is actually been super smooth.
For example I shipped out a package last week media mail. It was slated to
arrive in Illinois tomorrow. Arrived yesterday, a whole two days early. Most of
the stuff I have been getting from eBay has been
I was in a similar situation for 2 months with a couple of packages,
April-June, in the end I received everything ok.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 3:41 PM Bill Degnan via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> I have a vintage computer sitting in the LA USPS since 9/17, with no
> further updates.
On 2020-09-29 17:34, Bjoren Davis via cctalk wrote:
> If it helps, I bought a copy of the DEC Professional 350 Field
> Maintenance Print Set (MP-01394) on eBay a few months back.
EXCELLENT!
>
> I've scanned it but I've been waffling about where to post it. Scanned
> @600DPI with lossless
On 2020-09-30 9:41 a.m., Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
> I have a vintage computer sitting in the LA USPS since 9/17, with no
> further updates. I have read in the local papers there that the entire
> post office has ground to a halt. What's going on there? I have never
> heard of anything like
I have a vintage computer sitting in the LA USPS since 9/17, with no
further updates. I have read in the local papers there that the entire
post office has ground to a halt. What's going on there? I have never
heard of anything like this. I assume my package will survive but think of
the zoo
whats the story on this...i see items but no pix. also check your
spelling on Motorola; Instrmentation and Control, Inc. that is in the
index. let me now if there is a photo group for this at least with the
covers I always wondered if it was just a 12 bit
i may have posted a link yes i k ow cctalk is lacking in image handling.
maybe some day that will change. it was years back. it may be
something josh has already... but maybe not. neat he found the hardware!
In a message dated 9/30/2020 4:08:43 AM US Mountain Standard
On 9/30/20 4:07 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
On 9/30/20 3:12 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
Josh I posted photo of a manual we had a long time but not too long if you want to search the cctalk here..
If you did, it was eaten, since cctlk doesn't allow attachements
On 9/30/20 3:12 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
Josh I posted photo of a manual we had a long time but not too long if you want to search the cctalk here..
If you did, it was eaten, since cctlk doesn't allow attachements
Josh I posted photo of a manual we had a long time but not too long
if you want to search the cctalk here.. Also always wondered which
plant built in... is this same basically as a pbp 8 or is it just
that they are both 12 bits? Thanks Ed# In a message
On 9/29/20 11:03 PM, P Gebhardt wrote:
I'd be *very* interested to see docs on bitsavers, too. There are four IPI-2
drives (5-inch) in a SUN enclosure and I never came across any documents for
them.
Cheers,
Pierre
Den ons 30 sep. 2020 kl 08:26 skrev Josh Dersch via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org>:
> Hi all --
>
> This is a long shot, but I was curious if anyone might have information on
> the Motorola MDP-1000 minicomputer. I picked one up recently and I'm
> working on restoring it. Of particular
Hi all --
This is a long shot, but I was curious if anyone might have information on
the Motorola MDP-1000 minicomputer. I picked one up recently and I'm
working on restoring it. Of particular interest is the power supply, which
is external to the processor and which I am missing. I think I
>
>one of the white whales.
>anyone have OEM documentation for their 5" Elite SMD or IPI drives?
>
>The only thing I've ever been able to find was an installation manual for the
>SMD verison
I'd be *very* interested to see docs on bitsavers, too. There are four IPI-2
drives (5-inch) in a SUN
45 matches
Mail list logo
