On 8/29/23 7:28 PM, David Arnold wrote:
Some of you might recall that Apple released a series of machines based
on the Newton OS in the early 1990s.
ACK
How do Palm Pilot's compare to the Newton?
I had someone I respect and trust make a lot of comparisons between a
Palm T3 (?) I used to
On 8/18/23 9:06 PM, Adam Thornton wrote:
Have you considered sqlite3?
Yes, I have considered SQLite many times over many years and multiple
versions. I'm quite happy with it.
It's a SQL engine, but the backend is just a file.
Yep.
So it doesn't support concurrent access by multiple
On 8/3/23 1:21 PM, KenUnix wrote:
Hi.
Hi Ken,
Has anyone got SCO Unix to successfully install and run on Virtualbox?
*Which* *version* of SCO? UnixWare, OpenServer, or something older?
My efforts have failed. My host is Ubuntu 22.04 with Virtualbox 7.0.10.
I don't remember the last
On 7/10/23 10:54 AM, Ali wrote:
Hello All,
Hi Ali,
I am wondering if anyone has a private or knows of a mirror for
ftp.compaq.com that is older than 2014?
I'm watching a video talking about Protoweb and one of the ftp sites
that they are talking about is ftp.compaq.com.
The video in
On 7/10/23 1:18 PM, Ali wrote:
Hi Grant,
Hi Ali,
I am currently looking for the following:
Firmware for the MSL5000 Tape Library (version 5.20). The file name
would be something like Nextgen_520.bin. The MSL5000 is a rebranded
Overland library. Apparently you could have used the original
On 7/10/23 10:54 AM, Ali wrote:
Hello All,
Hi,
I am looking for some old documentation and firmware for Compaq
switches and Tape Libraries but if anyone has a full set of files I
am happy to add them to a mirror. TIA!
I can't help with the mirror, but maybe I can help with the old spinning
On 7/9/23 7:21 PM, John Herron wrote:
It can be a buzz kill if you visit about:logins on Firefox.
Yes, that can be a bit of a surprise to someone not in the know.
But if you stop and think about it for a few minutes, any and all
password managers absolutely MUST have access to the
On 7/9/23 3:12 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
It helps if you're running a version of *nixand not fenestrae.
Not as much as one would hope.
Android (Linux) and iOS (BSD derivative thus probably has a better clain
to Unix) have had 1-click or the dreaded 0-click vulnerabilities (bugs)
repeatedly
On 7/8/23 4:27 AM, dave.g4...@gmail.com wrote:
... sorry sent this to soon...
Things happen.
Despite what your browser says, the link itself isn't dangerous. Web browsers
aren't dangerous. Its USERS that are dangerous.
All the single, or worse zero click, attack vectors tend to imply that
On 7/7/23 2:24 PM, Sellam Abraham wrote:
How else are we to know that the capacitor is charged, or that the
link is dangerous?
You touch your neighbor with it. }:-)
Grant. . . .
On 7/6/23 7:47 PM, Doug Jackson wrote:
Hi Everybody.
Hi,
It is important to keep everyone aware of phishing attempts, but it's
also important to make sure when you send warning emails to simply
delete the actual URL that the criminals provide so that nobody
accidently clicks on
On 7/6/23 9:42 AM, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
Doesn't the list check addresses to see if the poster is a member?
This has never been a good test. It really only works to reject blatant
unwanted messages.
It's trivial to lie and say that a message is from someone that it is
not from. Both
On 6/28/23 12:13 AM, Fred Cisin wrote:
It is sometimes caalled that.
;-)
With many boxes of used cables, often there will be cables that are
DB-25, but with 16 pins missing in the 25 pin connector, often leaving
pins 1-8 and 20, and gaps where other pins could have been.. I call
THAT a
On 6/28/23 8:48 AM, Tony Duell wrote:
I was being a bit of a smart alec too.
I'm glad that I was / you were / we are as I think this is shaping up to
be another very interesting thread where I learn a lot of minutia that I
wouldn't otherwise learn.
#todayIlearned :-D
Tony's email makes me ask more questions than I have (smart alack)
answers to. Maybe ~> hopefully I can ~> will learn something.
On 6/27/23 10:26 PM, Tony Duell wrote:
For a few inches, which would be enough here I think, I've used an IDC
DA15 plug and socket crimped onto the normal ribbon
If we're being pedantic ;-)
On 6/27/23 9:35 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
Since you asked for it, the PC joystick connector was a DA-15;
the PC VGA connector was a DE-15.
Wasn't PC VGA considered a /High/ /Density/ DE-15?
A DB-9 was a 25 pin connector (often serial), and often with pins 1-8
and
On 3/10/23 6:10 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
Certainly check the Power OK signal from the power supply, if that
isn't working the whole system will be frozen.
When I next spend some time on the system I will check the voltages from
the power supply.
Will I be able to get an accurate measurement if
On 3/10/23 1:57 PM, Sellam Abraham wrote:
Don't underestimate the troubleshooting utility of re-seating every
chip that is socketed.
Fair enough.
Though I think there are very few socketed chips:
Link - IBM PS/2 Model 80 "Type 1" (386DX-16) Planer
-
On 3/8/23 9:18 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
I acquired an IBM PS/2 Model 80 (8580-071) today and am looking for
advice on what I should do to check it out before, during, and after
applying power for the first time.
After many comments here and elsewhere indicating that nothing should
smoke, I
On 3/9/23 2:24 PM, John Maxwell wrote:
Is there a repository to where I can upload diskette images?
As others have indicated, the Internet Archive seems to be an acceptable
place.
There are some other places that are more subject matter specific. The
A.T.C. comes to mind for IBM PS/2
On 3/9/23 1:49 PM, Bill Degnan wrote:
I have worked on enough of these to not take chances. It's a pain if
you have to guess. If you can't get into the hard drive you can't read
the config.sys and autoexec.bat for clues, you can't run a diagnostics
as easily. So it's just conservative, my
On 3/9/23 1:03 PM, Bill Degnan wrote:
That's my point, at least try the system see if it works as is, but
assume the battery is just about dead if not completely. May have
enough juice for one or two more boots. so get the info out of it
you can.
I'm curious, what do you think /might/ be
On 3/9/23 10:16 AM, John Maxwell wrote:
Nowhere do I see any mention of a Model 80 Reference Disk. If you don't
have one of these, you will not be able to configure the machine.
Yep. I'm well aware. This is not my 1st PS/2 rodeo. I actually cut my
teeth on used PS/2s in the mid-90s.
I
On 3/9/23 6:20 AM, Bill Degnan wrote:
First and foremost, try to boot the computer to make note of the
configuration, if there is one still stored in the system.
Hum. That sort of surprises me. I naively assumed that there would be
some work that I should do before powering the system on to
Hi,
I acquired an IBM PS/2 Model 80 (8580-071) today and am looking for
advice on what I should do to check it out before, during, and after
applying power for the first time.
I'll try to get some pictures if anyone is interested.
The label near the power switch says that it's an 8580-071.
On 2/2/23 4:28 PM, Jim Brain wrote:
Hmm, I'd be happy to do a Zoom call to show folks. Git can be
complicated, but the simpler items are easy and using the command line
git connected to a github/bitbucket/gitlab repo and a simple git push
and all your local data/files under control are
On 1/23/23 6:36 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
There's a chance that any existing Reply-To: is overwritten by the
mailing list. -- Maybe I should test that. }:-)
It seems as if the list adds its' self to the Reply-To: header.
"General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts&qu
On 1/23/23 1:50 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
I've solved this problem with a simple procmail rule:
I did similar.
#
REPLYTO_=`formail -cXCc: | cut -d',' -f1 | sed -e 's/Cc: //' | sed -e
's/\"/\\\"/g'`
0 fw
* ^To:.*classiccmp|^Cc:.*classiccmp
| sed -e 's/\[cctalk\] //g' |
On 1/23/23 10:04 AM, Tony Jones via cctalk wrote:
The issue is that Gmail filtering isn't great at filtering the list,
the way it's setup. A lot of people use it. Clicking to block the
sender blocks the entire list.
You bring up a valid concern, people filtering the entire list instead
of
On 1/8/23 8:41 PM, Doc Shipley via cctalk wrote:
I avoid Disk Utility like the plague.
Doc, will you please elaborate on why you avoid the Disk Utility (.app)?
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 1/7/23 1:04 AM, Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk wrote:
Maybe the other way around. I don't really know what the timeline
was, but it seems to me maybe soft fonts came first, with the VT220.
The VT240 had sixel graphics, right? But I'm guessing it came later.
As would the VT340.
ACK
Probably.
On 1/6/23 11:39 AM, Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk wrote:
It started with an idea about sixel graphics, but I repurposed it.
Ah. That makes sense.
VT220 (and followups) use sixels for soft fonts.
Interesting.
I've done some with Sixel, more than most, less than some, but my XTerm,
which does
On 1/6/23 2:34 AM, Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk wrote:
I have successfully done that with a real VT220. Here are some .txt
files with samples. They upload a custom font and arrange characters on
screen to display a picture. The Emacs Lisp code does the conversion.
On 12/22/22 2:24 PM, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
For PC’s, being able to run WinXP is an interesting cutoff
Why use a cut off that's based on a date?
After all, the list is a moving / sliding window.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 12/22/22 3:41 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
Win95/Win98 would be happy with a PC/AT 286, with appropriate RAM
I don't think "happy" is how I would describe that.
Would it run? Maybe.
Would I want to run it like that? Nope. Not at all.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 12/20/22 10:12 PM, Chris via cctalk wrote:
This beast was given to me by a neighbor. Dual socket 604. Windows
2003 in some RAID configuration.
It might help us to know what model the Dell server is.
I understand (or used to understand) RAID levels somewhat. But iinm he
tells me the OS is
I've not (yet) read 40+ messages in this thread.
I'd borrow a measure from vehicle licensing in what defines a "classic"
car. Specifically any care 25 years old or older.
It's not a perfect line, but it is a relatively easy line. I find that
a quarter of a century to be easier to remember
On 12/12/22 3:38 PM, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote:
Enjoy this link instead:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/255471320134
Take a closer look at Rumi's original email.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 2:04 PM Larkin Nickle via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
[
On 11/16/22 12:15 AM, Ali via cctalk wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
Does anyone have a REASONABLY priced source for 6" x 14" anti-static
bags with zip lock tops? I've looked on eBay and Amazon with no
luck. I have also looked online and have only found heat sealable
bags. I am not sure if it is the
On 11/4/22 2:56 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
Short answer: ImageDisk
ACK
For FAT/DOS disks, I have a small script that creates both an .imd file
and a .zip file of the disk contents,
Nice!
I think that's in the same ball park as I would have assumed I'd do if
someone had asked
On 11/3/22 5:07 PM, Dennis Boone via cctalk wrote:
There aren't that many platforms that used CLV drives. I don't
recall seeing one in the PC world. If anyone did, they would have
been specialty stuff.
ACK
I haven't seen a flux imaging system for Zip/Jaz drives. MO stuff
might be easier
On 11/3/22 4:35 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
Also GCR, not MFM. NOT readable with a PC FDC.
Please expand "GCR".
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 11/3/22 3:57 PM, Glen Slick via cctalk wrote:
If they are 5¼ & 3½ inch disks which are not copy protected and
are readable with standard PC compatible floppy controllers, but not
necessarily limited to standard DOS formats, and you had a older PC
with a floppy controller which you could set
On 11/3/22 3:27 PM, Dennis Boone via cctalk wrote:
Some people are bothered by Kryoflux's behavior around openness of
their formats and the like. I _think_ they've addressed that, but
if you care about this, you will have to verify.
Ya. I'm starting to see that.
I don't /personally/ care
On 11/3/22 3:26 PM, Tomasz Rola via cctalk wrote:
I am (slowly) on my way to use ddrescue for similar thing(s).
I've used ddrescue for a /few/ of my disk images. Thankfully /most/ of
the 3½ disks that I've imaged have not needed ddrescue / SpinRite / et al.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 11/3/22 3:26 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
But, why do IMAGING on PC-DOS disks?
My /personal/ and primary use case is for use in virtual machines where
disk images (a la dd) is best (in my experience).
Why not just copy the files, and "ZIP" them?
Ziped (et al.) files are nice for
Hi,
n00b alert
Does anyone have a 101 level boot strap guide for someone wanting to get
into creating better-than-dd disk images?
I'm finding myself back in a position where I want to image / preserve
multiple 5¼ & 3½ inch disks. I think all of them are PC compatible
disks. Probably
On 10/29/22 4:35 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
Does anyone have a copy of DAEMON Tools Ultra 4.x install file(s)?
Shortly after I posted this message, someone from DAEMON Tools /
Disc-Soft responded to my support ticket and worked with me to get
things resolved.
I've got to say
On 10/30/22 4:34 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
Any use?
http://www.oldversion.com/windows/daemon-tools/
I will give that a try.
Thank you for the pointer.
I'm also exchanging emails with DAEMON Tools support. They /are/
responding and /trying/ to help. Sadly XP is being problematic.
Hi,
Does anyone have a copy of DAEMON Tools Ultra 4.x install file(s)?
I just purchased a lifetime license based on the documentation on their
site. The problem is that they don't have 4.x available for download.
I just need the install files and I'll use my personal license.
N.B. I need
On 10/17/22 2:14 PM, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote:
There were many benefactors from my loss, many innocent, some not.
Understood.
Those who benefitted from ill-begotten gains will pay for it in other ways,
if they haven't already. Such is the natural law.
Agreed.
For the record, my
On 10/17/22 12:52 PM, Ryan de Laplante via cctalk wrote:
Not everything could come home with me, so I sold the remaining lower
priority pieces to the first person who could clear the locker over
a weekend. I didn’t get much for it, but at least it didn’t go
to a recycler.
Hopefully you boot
On 10/12/22 11:38 AM, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote:
Still, it has a great keyboard and if it can do NFS I could hook it up
to my SAN.
I question the version of NFS it might do as opposed to what the SAN
supports. I'm guessing that the SAN supports NFSv3 and / or NFSv4. I
wouldn't hold my
On 10/11/22 4:14 PM, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote:
Trying to tar a directory and transfer it to my AT 7300 (SVR2 unix).
Tar -tf works fine on the Mac OSX, but when I copy it over the Unix (not
gnu) tar gives me a:
I suspect the differences between the tar on OSX and SysV R2 are between
On 10/10/22 5:47 PM, Stuff Received via cctalk wrote:
Indeed. Also, I have added more words and received more search
results. One would expect the opposite.
Google also tailors results to location and cookies. (I always search
in private mode.) Not what it once was...(Sigh)
Agreed all
On 10/10/22 10:33 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
4 words is not "Google-fu".
Sometimes knowing /which/ /words/ to search for is the problem.
I've also seen Google return extremely different search results for
different people.
Let's assume good intention and benign mistake. No need to
Hi Van,
On 10/6/22 2:49 PM, Van Snyder via cctalk wrote:
I have many 8mm tapes. A few are new. First comers get new ones.
I have a few 8mm cleaning cassettes
I have about a dozen DLT-II tapes.
I have some Ultrium LTO fibre-channel SCSI drives that were removed
from a tape-mounting robot
On 9/13/22 7:47 AM, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:
If somebody knows who this Connor is (tall slender guy with short dark
hair) can you give me his email?
I suspect that I know who he is. -- At least I know a Connor that is
big into the retro computing / mainframe world.
I have forwarded
On 8/13/22 12:52 AM, ben via cctalk wrote:
Would a serial to Wi-Fi converter work in your case as well?
No it would not.
I'm explicitly wanting to support things that are used over modems.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 8/11/22 11:39 PM, John Ball via cctalk wrote:
I've done this several different ways in the past, depending on your
take of "Cell phone".
Well, I believe that everything you've mentioned is somewhere in the
scope of a "cell phone". Maybe barely, but close counts in this context.
For the
On 8/11/22 2:07 AM, jim stephens via cctalk wrote:
I have used such as US Robotics with a vonage voip account pad. Sends
and receives faxes quite well, as well.
ACK
The cell phone perhaps could provide a connection. A friend used the
cell via Wifi tethering to a PC. Then set up a route
Does anyone know if it's possible, or -- better -- have experience using
a cell phone as a dial up modem?
I'm wondering about doing something as an alternative to a traditional
POTS modem connected to a VoIP ATA. I'd think that treating the phone
as a traditional modem with venerable Hayes
On 8/7/22 3:39 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
:-D I see what you did there.
Do you /really/? ;-)
Depends on the flies, of course. I discovered it by accident. I'm a
Brit (and Irish now). We're not all that big on pickled cucumbers --
gherkins -- in the UK. A lot of people pick the
On 8/5/22 12:31 AM, Doc Shipley via cctalk wrote:
All very true. I was just whacking at the low hanging fruit...
Whack away.
We're supposed to enjoy hobbies. Sometimes that means making fun of them.
While you're at it, will you whack some of the fruit flies in my kitchen
and moles in my
On 8/4/22 3:17 PM, Wayne S via cctalk wrote:
Since dropping DECNET is just a proposal and needs to be voted on,
what’s the chance the vote will pass?
I have no idea.
Though if it's being considered now, it will be considered again at some
point in the future if it's unmaintained.
If it
On 8/4/22 2:12 PM, Doc Shipley via cctalk wrote:
This becomes an actual showstopper when the most recent hardware
platform that will run the most recent Linux kernel to support DECNet
becomes impossible to maintain.
I'm not convinced that the inability to boot the newest kernel that
supports
On 8/2/22 2:37 PM, Wayne S via cctalk wrote:
I naively assume that since Decnet is a mature product supporting
it just means testing it with new versions of Linux so not too
much work is needed. If a linux distro keeps it it adds value to
that distro.
Fair enough.
I think the problem is
On 8/2/22 1:56 PM, Wayne S via cctalk wrote:
Does dropping Decnet mean the the commercial versions like Redhat
and any others that you pay support for will also lose Decnet?
I imagine that even commercially supported distributions will eventually
loose DECnet support. -- I don't see how
On 8/2/22 1:56 PM, Robert Armstrong via cctalk wrote:
AFAIK, VMS was the only DEC operating system (well, excepting the
Un*x derivatives) that supported TCP/IP. There were several third
party TCP/IP implementations for VMS (e.g. Wollongong, CMU, Process
Software, ...) and eventually DEC came
On 8/2/22 12:42 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
I think the context was TCP as an alternative transport, given the
fading DECnet support in Linux. And yes, that's an option for Unix
and VMS, but not for a number of other DEC operating systems that
have no TCP option.
Okay. I hadn't
On 8/2/22 11:52 AM, Robert Armstrong via cctalk wrote:
Umm... The problem is that there are a lot more DECnet systems than
just VMS.
Please elaborate.
I naively assumed that anything that was running DECnet was doing so to
be able to communicate with a DEC system / OS.
It sounds like you
On 8/1/22 9:00 AM, Ethan O'Toole via cctalk wrote:
Just a heads up in case you aren't familiar, there is a project out
there where someone was pulling data from Prodigy cache directories
(from installed software that was used, on old computers.) They were
working to re-create Prodigy.
I'm
On 7/31/22 4:46 PM, Rich Alderson via cctalk wrote:
What you have been describing, and what no one else seems to have
twigged to, is what we called a TIP ("terminal interface processor")
or EtherTIP (because it sat directly on the 3Mbit/10Mbit Ethernet,
unlike the ARPANET TIPs that sat on a
On 7/31/22 3:57 PM, Ali via cctalk wrote:
I am throwing a monkey wrench in it by trying to use a 1980s dumb
terminal as my I/O device. :)
It's not that big of a monkey wrench in and of itself. It just does
mean that you're in the minority use case. :-( -- Welcome to the
club. :-D
As
On 7/31/22 2:54 PM, Ali via cctalk wrote:
Can you expand on this? I am not sure how this is supposed to work
out. So in my scenario I have a dumb terminal connected to one of the
suggested devices. On the other side I have the out of band serial
port controller for my RAID connected to a
On 7/31/22 12:14 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
It's like Pi, I believe, another ARM based Linux device.
ACK
I started using the BBB some years ago when the Pi was using a chip
whose specs were secret. Supposedly that's been cured. The BBB
is built on TI silicon that comes with a
On 7/31/22 11:38 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
One easy way would be to plug in a USB to RS232 adapter into any old
Linux device, like a Pi. Another is to use an RS232 converter card
for the built-in UARTs. I don't know about the Pi, but I've used
such a device for the BeagleBone Black.
On 7/31/22 11:05 AM, Ali via cctalk wrote:
Well after looking around a bit last night and my Google fu failing to
provide anything worthwhile
:-/
Grant may be right i.e. there is no device that make a shell or a
telnet client available to a terminal and I will have to roll my
own.
I
On 7/30/22 11:23 PM, Ali via cctalk wrote:
I am ideally looking for a ready to go, low power device, I can hide
away as opposed to setting up a PC of my own running some *nix flavor
that I know can do this but is way over kill.
I feel like a Raspberry Pi or similar would fit the bill for this
On 7/30/22 10:15 AM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
I just saw an unknown to me connector listed on an eBay auction and was
wondering if anyone knows more about an "FS/2" connector.
Thank you all. It seems as "FS/2" is not a /type/ /of/ /connector/ so
muc
Hi,
I just saw an unknown to me connector listed on an eBay auction and was
wondering if anyone knows more about an "FS/2" connector.
Link - FS/2 to IBM PC-AT P-1940-0042 CABLE 6 FOOT FREE SHIPPING
- https://www.ebay.com/itm/304580270070
I assumed it was a typo / poor original copy that
On 7/21/22 8:02 PM, Jonathan Stone via cctalk wrote:
Digital Equipment Corp. VK100, aka GIGI. Try searching for "DEC GIGI"
Thank you for that information.
It seems as if GIGI is an acronym for General Imaging Generator and
Interpreter.
The DEC VK100 seems to be something similar to a DEC
On 7/21/22 6:30 PM, Dennis Boone via cctalk wrote:
I'm basically working on a GIGI demo, and would like to be able to
take existing vector files and convert them to ReGIS.
Is there somewhere that I can read about your efforts? Do you have a
blog, et al. that I can follow?
I'm also curious
On 7/21/22 6:30 PM, Dennis Boone via cctalk wrote:
Indeed. I've fiddled with Sixel in xterm, for example.
I've got both Sixel and ReGIS support in my Xterm. Not that I'm
actually doing anything with it at this time. Grand plans are still
waiting for sufficient Round Tuits.
It turns out
On 7/21/22 5:53 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
You might do some sleuthing to see if any vector programs will do what
you want.
My Gentoo system w/ ReGIS and Sixel USE flags has the following things
installed that include ReGIS (case insensitive / whole word) in the man
page
On 7/21/22 3:56 PM, Dennis Boone via cctalk wrote:
Does anyone know of a tool that can convert from one or more vector
image formats to ReGIS? For use on unix-ish platforms.
I'm conflating my Sixel work with my ReGIS work. I know that there are
a number of utilities to work with Sixel, but
On 7/18/22 11:00 AM, Jan Mleczko via cctalk wrote:
Dziękuję za twoją wiadomość. Przepraszam, jestem na wczasach i
odpowiem później.
I've seen at least five of these messages in the last few days.
I sent an email to cctalk-request@ and adm...@safe-mail.net asking if
there is anything that
On 7/18/22 10:59 AM, Robert Adamson via cctalk wrote:
I don’t know what’s changed but I’m receiving the cctech digests
as a collection of mime attachments now. I’m using an iPad and used
to just get a lengthy plain email. The mime attachments are a real
PITA to try to read!
My preference is
On 7/14/22 2:37 AM, Mark Linimon via cctalk wrote:
Closing this Friday the 15th (sorry for noticing this late). At the
University of Texas in downtown Austin.
I have no association with the University, etc.
https://swicoauctions.com/online/26/item/110345
I'd pay the current bid of $11
On 7/2/22 3:50 AM, D. Resor via cctalk wrote:
This video just popped up in my YT view. It was posted a couple days ago.
XEROX Word Processing Machines & Computers 1975 (Xerox 800 vintage promo
film)
That was an interesting video, thank you for sharing Don.
I don't know that I've ever heard
On 6/22/22 4:18 PM, Frank via cctalk wrote:
Email sent from my personal domain to friends’ gmail accounts
started going to their spam folders several months ago. Adding SPF
and DKIM DNS records for my domain allowed my emails to get delivered
to their inboxes.
Yep.
Gmail has been
On 6/20/22 5:58 PM, jim stephens via cctalk wrote:
I can't sent to gmail either with my domains
What errors are you getting?
Are you talking about trying to email people at Gmail directly or are
you seeing problems with Gmail recipients not getting messages you send
via a mailing list
On 6/22/22 3:18 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
gmail recently switched their security to OAuth2. The change was
very sudden.
I don't know how sudden it was. I see a post on a form that indicates
that Google probably gave (at least) three months notice of the change.
The post in question
On 5/31/22 10:48 PM, Dennis Boone via cctalk wrote:
If the stack that's installed is DECnet/DOS, then there are a few
docs on bitsavers. I'd guess that the command "C:\CJR" leads to the
stuff that loads the network stack and tries to set up the connections.
I have zero experience with DECnet
On 5/10/22 10:12 AM, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
They're yours if you or someone can pick them up here.
Thank you for the kind offer. Unfortunately I'm multiple states away
and am in no position to make such a journey.
I have other Sun hardware, but I only can support one or two Sun's
On 5/10/22 3:13 AM, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
Correct, they are Sun servers. I forgot they were there in the pic
when I made the listing. I have been trying to find a home for them
for months. Not "vintage enough"
Does "trying to find a home for them" mean in your collection or
On 5/9/22 3:54 PM, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
https://philadelphia.craigslist.org/sys/d/kennett-square-vintage-computers/7480814347.html
What are the two (identical) 1U servers that are missing the face /
bezel in picture 17? They look suspiciously like a Sun 1U server I have.
If they
On 4/22/22 1:26 PM, Glen Slick via cctalk wrote:
Swearing about it doesn't make it so.
Agreed.
Though swearing about it does speak to how strongly I /thought/ it was
the case.
Clearly I was wrong. It's only been about two decades since I would
have messed with this. Maybe my grey matter
On 4/22/22 12:03 PM, Rob Jarratt via cctalk wrote:
I decided to invest in a Hakko FR-301. It worked almost
immediately. Hours of trying before, I did it in 10 minutes!
Thank you for the feedback and the comparison of without and with it.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 4/22/22 11:46 AM, Warner Losh via cctalk wrote:
By the time there were PCI Adaptec cards, there was no longer a floppy
controller on them that I ever saw. As others have pointed out,
though, it would need special drivers and/or BIOS support because
PCI devices mixed poorly with ISA DMA that
1 - 100 of 698 matches
Mail list logo
