On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 11:54, emanuel stiebler via cctalk
wrote:
>
> On 2023-02-02 04:38, David Brownlee wrote:
>
> > That reminds me (looks at 43.5T of zfs pool that has not had a scrub
> > since 2021).
> >
> > It can be nice to have a filesystem which handles redundancy and also
> > the
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 5:54 AM emanuel stiebler via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 2023-02-02 04:38, David Brownlee wrote:
>
> > So, what else do you guys use, to make sure your data is safe for the
> > years to come?
>
I wanted to note a story about AWS: I used to be heavy into
On 2/2/23 4:28 PM, Jim Brain wrote:
Hmm, I'd be happy to do a Zoom call to show folks. Git can be
complicated, but the simpler items are easy and using the command line
git connected to a github/bitbucket/gitlab repo and a simple git push
and all your local data/files under control are
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 3:53 PM Bill Gunshannon via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/2/2023 6:39 PM, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote:
> > Hi Jim.
> >
> > I'd be down for that. It would also be an opportunity to socialize a
> > little bit. I don't believe we've ever had an
On 2/2/2023 6:39 PM, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 3:28 PM Jim Brain via cctalk
wrote:
I've tried a few times to make sense of how GitHub works but I gave up.
It's a mess.
Sellam
Hmm, I'd be happy to do a Zoom call to show folks. Git can be
complicated, but the
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 3:28 PM Jim Brain via cctalk
wrote:
> > I've tried a few times to make sense of how GitHub works but I gave up.
> > It's a mess.
> >
> > Sellam
>
> Hmm, I'd be happy to do a Zoom call to show folks. Git can be
> complicated, but the simpler items are easy and using the
On 2/2/2023 1:47 PM, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:26 AM Vincent Slyngstad via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
I've also seen a work style where everything is pushed to github when
"finished", but github storage limits are small and the interface is
awkward
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:26 AM Vincent Slyngstad via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> I've also seen a work style where everything is pushed to github when
> "finished", but github storage limits are small and the interface is
> awkward to me.
>
I've tried a few times to make sense of
On 2023-02-02 8:27 a.m., Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:
I do many backups on blu-ray DVD's, the theory is if they start to go
bad, maybe partial recovery of important files will be possible due to
having many copies on DVD.
This is getting a bit difficult as the amount of stuff to be backed up
On 2/2/2023 3:54 AM, emanuel stiebler via cctalk wrote:
So, what else do you guys use, to make sure your data is safe for the
years to come?
I maintain a large SVN repository, which also serves as the backing
store for my website. I rely on the backup policies at DreamHost, but I
also keep
I have a Synology 4-bay san that has 4 2-tb drives in a raid stripe. I backup
to that. I do convert software cd’s and dvd to .iso and floppies to .img and
copy the results to the san.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 2, 2023, at 07:27, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:
>
> On 2/2/23 05:54, emanuel
On 2/2/23 05:54, emanuel stiebler via cctalk wrote:
On 2023-02-02 04:38, David Brownlee wrote:
> That reminds me (looks at 43.5T of zfs pool that has not
had a scrub
> since 2021).
>
> It can be nice to have a filesystem which handles
redundancy and also
> the option to occasionally read all
> So, what else do you guys use, to make sure your data is safe for the
> years to come?
ZFS and redundant copies of important stuff, plus backups on media that's
likely to be readable in 10 years (meaning the drives must still work/be
available, too!)
Anything that's appropriate to have on a
13 matches
Mail list logo
