Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-17 Thread Santo Nucifora via cctalk
Al, I re-read your question and think you are referring to the manual I am looking for. I don't have the part number but I think it might be this: https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102665239 What I had was the " 5110 System Logic manual" that was a solid block. Sadly, I threw

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-17 Thread Santo Nucifora via cctalk
The manual with the schematics was at the back part of SY31-0405-3_IBM_5100_Maintenance_Information_Manual_Oct1979.pdf. PDF page 299 has the keyboard schematic/diagram. On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 4:15 PM Al Kossow via cctalk wrote: > On 6/17/21 1:10 PM, Santo Nucifora via cctalk wrote: > > One of

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-17 Thread Al Kossow via cctalk
On 6/17/21 1:10 PM, Santo Nucifora via cctalk wrote: One of the 5110's I acquired had a full set of manuals but they were water damaged and the schematics manual was one solid block of paper with all pages stuck together what was the part number of that manual?

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-17 Thread Santo Nucifora via cctalk
To provide an update on the repairs so far, I've been able to save a few boards while others are waiting for parts. I was able to save a display card (I have two bad ones and one is waiting for parts) and an APL ROS card which is really great. All by replacing some bad TTL logic chips. I still

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-13 Thread Mattis Lind via cctalk
Den lör 12 juni 2021 kl 10:54 skrev Christian Corti via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org>: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2021, Santo Nucifora wrote: > > I am currently working on an IBM 5100 that has some issues. I know for > > certain that the 5100 has a bad graphics controller card so I need to dig > > into

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-12 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 6/12/21 1:58 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jun 2021, Tony Duell wrote: >> I wonder if in the original list, a '1' was misread as a '7' or vice >> versa. I am told that in some countries the '7' is conventionally >> written with a crossbar across the downstroke to avoid

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-12 Thread Santo Nucifora via cctalk
Thanks for that link Christian. I've seen your list before but couldn't find it and the website I got this transcribed list from is long gone. I'll check your list against what I have and make sure the one I have posted is accurate and post a link to yours, if that's okay. Santo On Sat, Jun

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-12 Thread Christian Corti via cctalk
On Sat, 12 Jun 2021, Tony Duell wrote: I wonder if in the original list, a '1' was misread as a '7' or vice versa. I am told that in some countries the '7' is conventionally written with a crossbar across the downstroke to avoid this. My father always did this, for all it is not common in

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-12 Thread Christian Corti via cctalk
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021, Santo Nucifora wrote: I am currently working on an IBM 5100 that has some issues. I know for certain that the 5100 has a bad graphics controller card so I need to dig into component level replacements for those ICs I can replace. I have a list of logic chip equivalents to

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-11 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
On Sat, 12 Jun 2021, Tony Duell via cctalk wrote: In both cases it would require an input pin to become an output, something that I can't see how it would happen. I wonder if in the original list, a '1' was misread as a '7' or vice versa. I am told that in some countries the '7' is

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-11 Thread Tony Duell via cctalk
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:39 AM Jon Elson via cctalk wrote: > > On 6/11/21 3:22 PM, Santo Nucifora via cctalk wrote: > > The 74151 is an 8:1 multiplexer with complementary outputs. > > The 74157 is a quad 2:1 mux. > > I can't imagine any defect that would cause one to test out > as the other.

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-11 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk
On 6/11/21 3:22 PM, Santo Nucifora via cctalk wrote: The 74151 is an 8:1 multiplexer with complementary outputs. The 74157 is a quad 2:1 mux. I can't imagine any defect that would cause one to test out as the other. Jon

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-11 Thread Santo Nucifora via cctalk
Thank you for the quick reply. As soon as you wrote that, I checked my list again and I have two entries for 74151. The other is 2392121 which I assume is the right one? Would you mind sharing your list? I can cross-reference and see how accurate mine is. Thanks again, Santo On Fri, Jun 11,

Re: IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-11 Thread Paul Berger via cctalk
My reliable list says your cheap logic tester is right 1582601 = 74157 Paul. On 2021-06-11 5:22 p.m., Santo Nucifora via cctalk wrote: I am currently working on an IBM 5100 that has some issues. I know for certain that the 5100 has a bad graphics controller card so I need to dig into component

IBM Logic IC equivalency information needed

2021-06-11 Thread Santo Nucifora via cctalk
I am currently working on an IBM 5100 that has some issues. I know for certain that the 5100 has a bad graphics controller card so I need to dig into component level replacements for those ICs I can replace. I have a list of logic chip equivalents to the IBM part numbers that are written on the