On 2021-03-07 23:00, Paul Koning wrote:
On Mar 5, 2021, at 9:02 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2021-03-06 02:33, Paul Koning wrote:
...
I would have liked better comms. The USART has such a tiny FIFO that you can't
run it at higher than 9600 bps even with the J-11 CPU. At least
> On Mar 5, 2021, at 9:02 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>
> On 2021-03-06 02:33, Paul Koning wrote:
>>> ...
>
>> I would have liked better comms. The USART has such a tiny FIFO that you
>> can't run it at higher than 9600 bps even with the J-11 CPU. At least not
>> with RSTS; perhaps a
On 07/03/2021 21:31, Dennis Boone via cctalk wrote:
> Sold for $4,900. Looks like a couple of low score bidders got in a
> bidding war and really wanted to win.
Must be those deskthority people _really_ wanted those '220
keyboards. :)
On UK epay, an LK201 fetches maybe £25 - £50. Pity, I
> Sold for $4,900. Looks like a couple of low score bidders got in a
> bidding war and really wanted to win.
Must be those deskthority people _really_ wanted those '220
keyboards. :)
De
On 3/7/2021 1:56 PM, Glen Slick via cctalk wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:25 PM Wayne S via cctalk
wrote:
Is anyone from this list bidding on this.
If so i’ll back out. Just don’t want it to be “recycled “ and i have room for
it.
*Wow* That's a bit much.
On 3/7/2021 2:56 PM, Glen Slick via cctalk wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:25 PM Wayne S via cctalk
wrote:
Is anyone from this list bidding on this.
If so i’ll back out. Just don’t want it to be “recycled “ and i have room for
it.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:25 PM Wayne S via cctalk
wrote:
>
> Is anyone from this list bidding on this.
> If so i’ll back out. Just don’t want it to be “recycled “ and i have room for
> it.
>
>
>
> I merely wanted to point out the ambiguity in the original message,
> though...
>
Every time I ran across "DG" in there I had to stop because I mentally
filled in "Data General" at first.
I have one of their dual 8" floppy drives for a Z80 machine. Be
interesting to see the final video.
On Sat, 2021-03-06 at 10:13 -0800, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>
> It should be possible to do the same using a Blue Pill cheapie and
> MAX232 level shifter. Still if this is a one-off, I doubt that it
> would matter to the user.
That's what I had started thinking. Use the STM32 board with
At 07:55 PM 3/6/2021, John Foust via cctalk wrote:
>And I guess I hadn't thought of that case where the file system
>named the number of bytes in the file and that the unused ends
>of blocks could also contain stuff, too. Is there a name for those bytes?
An interesting analysis of "slack bytes"
> From: Jim Stephens
> The 286 can exit protected mode with the LOADALL instruction.
Really? So why all the hullabaloo about Triple Faults:
http://www.rcollins.org/Productivity/TripleFault.html
back in the day; and why did IBM set up the keyboard controller so it could
send a RESET
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk On Behalf Of Fred Cisin via
> cctalk
> Sent: 06 March 2021 23:17
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>
> Subject: Re: 80286 Protected Mode Test
>
> A stupid idea:
> Could the test require, and be failing, access to memory above
The tapes are now hosted here:
http://vtda.org/bits/software/DEC/PDP-10/tymshare/
Jim Carpenter wrote:
> Tony Aiuto wrote:
>> I think that is an artifact of the files being created with the wrong
>> names. For example, with tape 169249, after you skip the UFDs, tito
>> -t prints
>>
>>(SYS).SHR1977-01-26 22:22 [1,4]
>> [...]
>>
>> All the file names are
14 matches
Mail list logo
