I am interested in comparing notes as I just documented my install on
Centos and was going to offer it to the wiki as well.
Regards,
DNK
On 25-Jun-08, at 1:08 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, everyone.
I added a new guide for installing and
Bonjour,
J'ai un problème pour traduire upstream provider qui apparaît à de
multiples reprises. Je comprend bien ce que cela veut dire, mais je ne
voit pas comment le traduire.
Merci d'avance.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Aymeric DERBOIS wrote:
Bonjour,
J'ai un problème pour traduire upstream provider qui apparaît à de
multiples reprises. Je comprend bien ce que cela veut dire, mais je ne
voit pas comment le traduire.
For our non-french readers: He's looking for a french translation for
the term upstream
hy there,
I hope as on http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Artwork
mentioned I'm here at the right place for that. It also fits for the
Promo SIG or others
Under http://www.braincache.de/centos/CentOS_Styleguide_0.1-draft.pdf
can be my first idea of an Styleguide wich could help to
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0556
freetype security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0556.html (updated)
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/freetype-2.1.4-10.el3.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0556
freetype security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0556.html (updated)
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0498 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0498.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7def85e9330093cdc4e62452a1294de7
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0498 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0498.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
c5b4f612e365584e479f303ca883b770
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0499
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0499.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
08c81d8405cef2d476c97f0f60961404
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0526
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0526.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
a07a51fbf720be8879d9ab369a42ce34
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0529 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0529.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
77a5e79229864fcd06f82d462b528689
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0529 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0529.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
018f6bc07b6ee131f9d262d3c75eb686
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0522 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0522.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
32c2ca09a7faaaf1459fbf663e72d076
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0522 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0522.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
4f171d828d680975a5d2304bbdf50e13
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0504 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0504.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
fa1fef968fe58c5702248ad4c2957201
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0536
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0536.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
b324526e7469e70e16d7c7505ce69bd5
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0513
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0513.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
eb95259ada75e93012f752824d4b5bb3
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0556 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0556.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
598310c1ea26d98d9a3b011496fbfd3f
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0556 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0556.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
9697d1e1059ab17e646ecabfb5c87a81
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0501
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0501.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
b934e068a7daf76e15080d43dd3101ca
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0494
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0494.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
f875f774254d08a02b6bdc5f00b5fd8c
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0494
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0494.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
5bb7058fa29cb0b5b8927e37c3a024fb
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0487
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0487.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
d776014eb266b87299465cb38e0f6b96
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0487
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0487.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
0ef11f016a2cf6545ae4abb356abc498
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0514 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0514.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
93be409b6ad731e3836e1451485477a1
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0514 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0514.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
4af4b0d51a96b5527aa52d4b8c1b0709
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0282
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0282.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
c573a7f634d2b404a686df29da1e8610
El día 25 de junio de 2008 10:41, Wilson Acha [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hola, alguno sabe como activar los efctos de escritorio,
especificamente el compiz fision en centos 5.1, bueno la verdad que
estoy un poco picado con todo esto, pero no por esto deseo abandonas a
mi centos ;)
El compiz
2008/6/25 Esteban Saavedra L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
El compiz viene por defecto en centos 5.1, comprueba si lo tienes
instalado o procede a instalarlo si no lo tienes (yum install compiz)
Hola, cabo de instalarlo tanto en mi portatil como en mi ordenador de
casa, pero en ambos casos cuando le doy
On 6/24/08, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
On 5/28/08, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hola
...
... aqui están las notas en Español:
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.2/Spanish
Hola Alain
ya salió
Documento sin títuloHola amigos despues de 1 mes creo por fin logré instalar
icecast ya edite el archivo icecast.xml lo volvi a subir sin novedades ahora
no se como hacer arrancar el icecast en mi linux centos digito http://miip:8001
que es el puerto que abri para el icecast y que tambien le
Hola Cesar:
No he trabajado con el icecast, pero mirando el mensaje de error:
ahora trate de ejecutar este comando que creo que es para arrancar icecast
que es icecast -c/etc/icecast.xml -b y me sale
Starting icecast2
Detaching from the console
ERROR: You should not run icecast2 as root
Gregory Gerard wrote:
Does someone have a list I can place in the packages section which is
known to work and really get everything?
yum install \*
Considering you could be pulling in upto 5,000 pkgs, make sure you have
enough drive space, fat network pipe, and lots of time.
--
Karanbir
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ]
crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping 03,
CPU1 the same).
I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3.
The
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Wojtek Pilorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ]
crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping
03,
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
Hello.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Olaf Mueller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since upgrading to CentOS 5.2 my notebook hangs while booting [...]
Could you create a bug report on bugs.centos.org ? [...]
Ok, done as ID 0002912.
Thank you and regards
Olaf
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was upgrading a CentOS 5.1 box to 5.2 remotely, and I lost my ssh
connection to the server. Now when I rerun the yum upgrade it fails due
to conflicts in the transaction check stage. Before I dig myself a deeper
hole,
Use a kickstart-file that has a nobase statement..
And have a look at CLIP (http://oss.tresys.com/projects/clip/wiki/WikiStart)
for a truly minimal kickstart (and a lot of other security related stuff, if
you're interested)..
Cheers,
Bart
- Original Message -
From: Karanbir Singh
Agree with everything you're saying about bleeding edge distros.
Having written quite a bit of PHP, however, I think its fair to say that
most developers are fully aware that software is always evolving and
probably believe that you may as well write for the latest version
because before long
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:13:11 -0400
J == John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marko
J A. Jennings Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:18 PM To:
J centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I've run into some trouble with a new cPanel VPS, and noticed that
it's running CentOS by default, installed via the CentOS http server.
My question is, how do I downgrade CentOS to 5.1?
There is no way to downgrade, however you
Thanks for the answers
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:51:37 -0400
MS == Meenoo Shivdasani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MS On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Johnny Hughes
MS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a BUG with nss_ldap:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448014
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was upgrading a CentOS 5.1 box to 5.2 remotely, and I lost my ssh
connection to the server. Now when I rerun the yum upgrade it fails due
to conflicts in the transaction check stage. Before I dig
Hi list,
Since the upgrade to 5.2, when I log into my server with a ldap account
I have these 2 errors messages:
-bash: [: =: unary operator expected
-bash: [: -le: unary operator expected
After investigation, the trouble come from two scripts in /etc/profile.d:
kfx wrote:
Hi list,
Since the upgrade to 5.2, when I log into my server with a ldap account
I have these 2 errors messages:
-bash: [: =: unary operator expected
-bash: [: -le: unary operator expected
After investigation, the trouble come from two scripts in /etc/profile.d:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:49:08AM +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Wojtek Pilorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ]
crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
with dual
I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3.
I don't have the necessary knowledge to evaluate kernel related issues,
but it seems to me that there's some kind of confusion involved here.
People are reporting problems with Intel Pentium II and III machines yet
PowerNow is a speed
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Could you post the output of the command /bin/rpm -qa --qf
'%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' ?
I would add a | sort to that like this:
/bin/rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' | sort
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /bin/rpm -qa --qf
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the
feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
--
Best Wishes
Sorin
-
http://home-skynet.servehttp.com/
Proud member of TEAM OS/2.
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2008 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get
the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
Zero problems here after upgrading a bunch of servers. I guess the majority of
users without
Ha, until now it looks ok, but i only upgraded yesterday evening...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:29:41 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorin.srbu Hi all,
sorin.srbu
sorin.srbu Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to
5.2?? I get the
sorin.srbu feeling that
Ian Blackwell wrote:
cups-libs-1.2.4-11.14.el5_1.6.i386.rpm
cups-libs-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
you have a few pkgs like this where more than 1 version is installed in
the rpmdb, no idea what the real state on the machine drive is.
Remove the NEWER version of these packages then redo the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the
feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it
just worked, wont get reported, but if things
There are lots of exciting things happening in the CentOS ecosystem at
the moment, by which I mean upstream or across stream in Fedora and
RHEL.
I'm thinking of projects that equip RH-like EL in general for serious
entry into the enterprise, things like the Fedora Directory Server, and
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Miguel Medalha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3.
I don't have the necessary knowledge to evaluate kernel related issues, but
it seems to me that there's some kind of confusion involved here.
People are reporting
There are lots of exciting things happening in the CentOS ecosystem at
the moment, by which I mean upstream or across stream in Fedora
and RHEL.
I'm thinking of projects that equip RH-like EL in general for serious
entry into the enterprise, things like the Fedora Directory Server,
and
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 00:16 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
AND HURRY UP! My new fat pipe (potential 1.25MB/sec) has finally edged
up to 85.5KB/sec. I need the help folks! ;-)
Is that for uplink or downlink ? if you are downloading at 85k/sec there
is something
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 03:48 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I do not know the command line for symbolic links. I created the
symbolic link of /Centos/5 to /Centos/5.1 in Nautilus which does not
have a method of changing a symbolic link. Only deleting it and
admin wrote:
I'm thinking of projects that equip RH-like EL in general for serious
entry into the enterprise, things like the Fedora Directory Server, and
RedHat's Emerging Technologies projects such as Cobbler, FreeIPA and
Ovirt. Also JBoss middleware.
A lot ( if not all ) of these are going
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:09 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 6/23/08, Timothy Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Orlando, FL. The move from Firefox 1.5 to 3.0 should be a big
improvement for those of us who are Desktop users.
Be aware that the FF beta version RH released will not
Andreas Micklei scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:37 PM:
Thank you CentOS team for the good work!
I second that!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
William L. Maltby wrote:
After reviewing the man pages again (the upmteenth time), no help.
might the default upload/download rate limits be bringing you down ?
iirc, almost all BT clients have some limit or the other... rtorrent
perhaps does not.
- KB
Karanbir Singh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2??
I get the
feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it
just worked, wont get
Karanbir Singh scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:51 PM:
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I
get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it
just worked,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:59:36AM +0200, Wojtek Pilorz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:49:08AM +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Wojtek Pilorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686
]
crashes
On 6/25/08, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
After reviewing the man pages again (the upmteenth time), no help.
might the default upload/download rate limits be bringing you down ? iirc,
almost all BT clients have some limit or the other... rtorrent perhaps
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 12:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
After reviewing the man pages again (the upmteenth time), no help.
might the default upload/download rate limits be bringing you down ?
iirc, almost all BT clients have some limit or the other... rtorrent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the
feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 12:54 +0100, Michael Simpson wrote:
On 6/25/08, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
snip
might the default upload/download rate limits be bringing you down ? iirc,
almost all BT clients have some limit or the other... rtorrent perhaps
Dunc wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2??
I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
Thanks to all that offered advice to help solve this for me. Here's a
round up for those that may follow in similarly ill-fated foot-steps.
1. Don't update/upgrade remotely without using screen. Dropping the
ssh session caused yum to die inelegantly, with duplicate packages in
the RPM
I tried to download 64 bit CENTOS 5.2 DVD ISO. I already checked more than 30
download site and can NOT find it. Some site show DVD ISO in there, but it is
fake.
My company does NOT allow use torrent to download files. Any ideal?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to all that offered advice to help solve this for me. Here's a round
up for those that may follow in similarly ill-fated foot-steps.
1. Don't update/upgrade remotely without using screen. Dropping the ssh
session
2008/6/25 mcclnx mcc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I tried to download 64 bit CENTOS 5.2 DVD ISO. I already checked more than
30 download site and can NOT find it. Some site show DVD ISO in there, but
it is fake.
This URL works for me
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 12:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get
the
feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
I upgraded 4 machines (all virtual) without any problems from 5.1 to
5.2,
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 13:30 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Micklei scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:37 PM:
Thank you CentOS team for the good work!
I second that!
Me too !! And another donation on its way to CentOS ! :)
Regards,
Michel
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
2008/6/25 mcclnx mcc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I tried to download 64 bit CENTOS 5.2 DVD ISO. I already checked more than
30 download site and can NOT find it. Some site show DVD ISO in there, but
it is fake.
This URL works for me
Johnny Hughes wrote:
If there is something in the conf file that needs to change (that
worked in 5.1 and does not in 5.2) let us know and we can add it to
the release notes and/or wiki.
It was in the listening section as follows:
# A space separated list of IP or host addresses where to
Hi Guys!
Thanks to the whole Centos team for all their hard work. You have no IDEA
how much I appreciate it!
I ran yum upgrade last night, rebooted this morning and encountered
a couple of small problems:
1. shutdown -h now goes all the way down but does not power down the
box like it always has
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 14:39 +0200, Michel van Deventer wrote:
Hi,
snip
I upgraded 4 machines (all virtual) without any problems from 5.1 to
5.2, tonight I'll upgrade the host machine but I do not expect any
problems.
I'm only cautious to upgrade my old webserver which is a dual PIII and
Yesterday, in the afternoon, I did yum update on my Desktop. Everything
seemed AOK. After power down last night, when I powered on this morning, it
began to boot the new Kernel and then seemed to die. Instead of getting the
progress of the boot on the CRT, the screen was blank and nothing
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday, in the afternoon, I did yum update on my Desktop. Everything
seemed AOK. After power down last night, when I powered on this morning, it
began to boot the new Kernel and then seemed to die. Instead of getting the
Hi,
I did a standard i386 install of 5.2 on a test machine. Then I ran the
following command
yum install \*
and got the following error.
Error: Missing Dependency: pilot-link-devel = 0.11.8 is needed by package
gnome-pilot-devel
Checking my local repo and my usual upstream mirrors for
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 15:13 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:13:39AM -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
on 6-20-2008 12:41 AM Luigi Perroti spake the following:
Hello, I'd like to ask a couple of things:
1) I would like to move from Debian to CentOS.
One thing I will
Tony Molloy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Tim Verhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yesterday, in the afternoon, I did yum update on my Desktop. Everything
seemed AOK. After power down last night, when I powered on this morning,
it
Tony Molloy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
oop's its the -devel package you are looking for... will investigate.
this package isnt in the upstream distro
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 14:21:31 Karanbir Singh wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
Jun Salen wrote:
I like to keep reasonably up-to-date with distributions I am running,
so would like to update to Centos-5.2 as and when it is released.
you will be up to date simply by running 'yum update'
When 5.2 is released, those updates will be installed
For the record, I
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 14:21:31 Karanbir Singh wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 14:27:27 Karanbir Singh wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
oop's its the -devel package you are looking for...
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
The best way to remove duplicate package is using rpm itself and the
--justdb switch. This will only remote entries inside the RPM database
and not on the filesytem itself. If you remove the newest version of
the duplicate packages you can run the yum update again and it
fred smith wrote:
Hello.
1. shutdown -h now goes all the way down but does not power down the
box like it always has before. Same when shutting down via the GUI
shutdown dialog.
I know this from systems with older processors. For me a 'apm=power-off'
in the /etc/grub.conf kernel-line does the
I noticed, that the directory
/usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/
is NOT created on CentOS 5.2. Therefor for instance the flash-plugin
is not installed for the new firefox
(After manually creating the directory and setting the right symlink
it works all right)
Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
I noticed, that the directory
/usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/
is NOT created on CentOS 5.2. Therefor for instance the flash-plugin
is not installed for the new firefox
(After manually creating the directory and setting the right symlink
it works all right)
installing
I grabbed the torrent off of one of the iso mirrors, but it is coming
down so slow - I have to wonder if the torrent file is the incorrect one
for the bad file mentioned on the list earlier.
Would someone be kind enough to point me to a mirror with a known good
torrent file?
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I've run into some trouble with a new cPanel VPS, and noticed that
it's running CentOS by default, installed via the CentOS http server.
My question is, how do I downgrade CentOS to 5.1?
There is no way to
Michael A. Peters wrote:
I grabbed the torrent off of one of the iso mirrors, but it is coming
down so slow - I have to wonder if the torrent file is the incorrect one
for the bad file mentioned on the list earlier.
You should be able to check the tracker, make sure its on .centos.org
Here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karanbir Singh wrote:
| David Hláčik wrote:
| My question is, which way i will achieve really minimum install
(with yum).
| So far, i have during install unchecked all packages , then
customized
| groups and removed everything including base
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
