On 12/08/2009, Brian Mathis brian.mathis+centosd...@gmail.com wrote:
Requesting access for BrianMathis on the wiki to make misc edits and
contributions.
Will you please elaborate on what you have in mind.
Alan.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Alan Bartletta...@elrepo.org wrote:
On 12/08/2009, Brian Mathis brian.mathis+centosd...@gmail.com wrote:
Requesting access for BrianMathis on the wiki to make misc edits and
contributions.
Will you please elaborate on what you have in mind.
Alan.
I wanted
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Phil
Schaffnerphilip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote:
... but left /dev/sda and /dev/sdb in
place as changing to /dev/sdX|Y looked very awkward to me.
...
Phil
That's exactly the point of using something like X/Y. It stands out
and looks awkward, which draws
Greetings ...
Been lurking on the list for some time, hoping that at some point, I
might be able to add to the collective (Yes, way to much StarTrek in
the background! ) ...
I have learn quite a bit by just lurking, but now I think I might
have something to add ... I'm not sure the exact
On 08/13/2009 02:58 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
Most projects have an open wiki, but the one on CentOS is closed. The
stated reason for that is to prevent spam. That's an acceptable
reason, marginally, but one that people can deal with. But the bar
then is raised even further where users have
On 08/13/2009 02:58 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
I wanted to fix an issue that came up on the centos mailing list, and
I've also done a bit of work on aligning partitions with RAID stripes.
Evolution had added a section on that, and I may be able to elaborate
on it.
btw, you didnt mention what
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1209
curl security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1209.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/curl-7.10.6-10.rhel3.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1209
curl security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1209.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/curl-7.10.6-10.rhel3.i386.rpm
Hi,
I was looking a stable repo when I find php-5.2.10 wich I can use on
my centos 5.3, previously I used a remi and epel repo but now they are
have a php-5.3.0.
Regards,
f...@ll
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi all,
If logging all logs via syslog to a central syslog server that are all
Centos based, what GUIs are out there to browse them etc. ? I know
about splunk but don't want to go down that route.
Also, some servers are hosted and would be best not sending their logs
across the net to a central
John R Pierce wrote:
is there a list more sutiable for c5-testing discussions? I'd like to
install the php-5.2.9 on there, but I'm getting a dependency problem
# yum update --enablerepo=c5-testing php
...
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
php-5.2.9-2.el5.centos.i386 from c5-testing has
Hi guys,
Sorry for the OT. I've posted it in some IBM related forums but no reply yet.
We've got an IBM pSeries p9115-505 machine from warehouse.
I notice that it doesn't have any port for the monitor.
Where do we plug the monitor?
From Google it says something about HMC (Hardware Management
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Fajar Priyantofajar...@arinet.org wrote:
Hi guys,
Sorry for the OT. I've posted it in some IBM related forums but no reply yet.
We've got an IBM pSeries p9115-505 machine from warehouse.
I notice that it doesn't have any port for the monitor.
Where do we plug
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Fajar Priyantofajar...@arinet.org wrote:
Sorry for the OT. I've posted it in some IBM related forums but no reply yet.
We've got an IBM pSeries p9115-505 machine from warehouse.
I notice that it doesn't have any port for the monitor.
Where do we plug the
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi guys,
Sorry for the OT. I've posted it in some IBM related forums but no reply yet.
We've got an IBM pSeries p9115-505 machine from warehouse.
I notice that it doesn't have any port for the monitor.
Where do we plug the monitor?
From Google it says something about
The second options is to use the serial port on the machine itself
(you will need a null-modem cable for this). Then using things like
minicom or hyperterminal you can access the console.
On the off-chance you are using a Vista laptop to connect via the serial
port, you can use putty
On Wednesday 12 August 2009 20:34:55 lostson wrote:
long snip
We need to stand up and ask - How may
I help ? What do you need to get this done. Ask yourself what talents do
you have that you can offer the project. There are many ways to do this
and you can find them here
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Geoff Galitzge...@galitz.org wrote:
The second options is to use the serial port on the machine itself
(you will need a null-modem cable for this). Then using things like
minicom or hyperterminal you can access the console.
On the off-chance you are using a
On Thursday August 13 2009, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Geoff Galitzge...@galitz.org wrote:
The second options is to use the serial port on the machine itself
(you will need a null-modem cable for this). Then using things like
minicom or hyperterminal you can
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
1) The Title of the article says How to Setup a Software RAID on CentOS 5
2) My successor is a real HK bred and born person so his command of the
English language is like most such persons; that is to say, very poor.
3) Regarding not letting him within ten
Max Hetrick wrote:
Someone added a very bright disclaimer, so all should be good in the
future. I do agree with others that using /dev/sdX would probably be
wise as well in documentation, but that doesn't fix the true root of the
problem. People really should watch cutting and pasting, or
Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
recommended or not?
need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
-mu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
will this update be released by centos?
Or because it's no security update it gets a lower priority in the queue?
Thx
Rainer
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
It is a new RHBA. I'm guessing it is in the pipeline and should appear soon.
Regards,
Tim
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Rainer Trauttr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
will this update be released by centos?
Or because it's no security update it gets a lower priority in the queue?
Thx
Rainer
madunix wrote:
Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
recommended or not?
need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
I guess that depends on your situation. For me, if it's a package that I
know isn't going to mess with users being logged on, or
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Tim
Verhoeventim.verhoeven...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a new RHBA. I'm guessing it is in the pipeline and should appear soon.
Regards,
Tim
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Rainer Trauttr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
will this update be released by centos?
Or
madunix wrote:
Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
recommended or not?
need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
I don't, but I watch the centos-announce list to see when important updates are
released. Our operations dept schedules all
Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
recommended or not?
need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
I've worked on projects where backend configuration files changed in syntax
or architecture between releases, which were released as
Again, Max, well said ;)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Max Hetrick maxhetr...@verizon.net wrote:
Max Hetrick wrote:
Someone added a very bright disclaimer, so all should be good in the
future. I do agree with others that using /dev/sdX would probably be
wise as well in
madunix ha scritto:
Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
recommended or not?
need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
-mu
I'm a very lazy sysadmin, and, although I know that is better to have full
control over updates... I let yum-cron do the
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 08:53 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Geoff Galitz wrote:
Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
recommended or not?
need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
I've worked on projects where backend configuration files
Geoff Galitz wrote:
Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
recommended or not?
need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
I've worked on projects where backend configuration files changed in syntax
or architecture between releases, which were
Max Hetrick wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
1) The Title of the article says How to Setup a Software RAID on CentOS 5
2) My successor is a real HK bred and born person so his command of the
English language is like most such persons; that is to say, very poor.
3) Regarding not
Thanks for the help. There is a way to get the information, but its
ugly.
Was hoping for a more straight forward method.
If a printer is down, I can us lpstat -l printer name to determine if a
job is stopped, but I could not figure out a way to easily determine the
status of jobs in the queue,
On 8/13/09, madunix madu...@gmail.com wrote:
Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
recommended or not?
need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
The NSA Guide to the Secure Configuration of RHEL 5 indicates this is
OK, but not with updatesd which
When I install some RPMS like openoffice 3 on centos x85_64
is there some command that will leave all the actual files alone (leave
them installed)
but just remove the RPM name from the RPM database so centos now things
the packages are not installed?
Reason is I was wanting to do this so a
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 13:11, Jerry Geisge...@pagestation.com wrote:
When I install some RPMS like openoffice 3 on centos x85_64
is there some command that will leave all the actual files alone (leave
them installed)
but just remove the RPM name from the RPM database so centos now things
the
Marcelo Roccasalva writes:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 13:11, Jerry Geisge...@pagestation.com wrote:
When I install some RPMS like openoffice 3 on centos x85_64
is there some command that will leave all the actual files alone (leave
them installed)
but just remove the RPM name from the RPM
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Geoff Galitz wrote:
...so I
know for a fact updates can break a running system.
On CentOS? Fedora does that all the time but _not_ having behavior-changing
updates in the long life of a major release is most of the point of
'enterprise'
At Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:11:49 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
When I install some RPMS like openoffice 3 on centos x85_64
is there some command that will leave all the actual files alone (leave
them installed)
but just remove the RPM name from the RPM database so centos
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:32, Curt Millshac...@fluke.com wrote:
You mean like every time new Apache2 updates come along they
_shouldn't_ break my failover cluster???
If you are using a cluster, and configuration files in a shared
directory, I believe you should configure your daemon not
Reason is I was wanting to do this so a next yum update does not get all
confused...
That should not be a problem. yum update will see that your installed
version (3.mumble) is greater than the version in the repository
(2.mumble) and will then skip updating openoffice.
That is not
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
This is certainly not a complete procedure on how to configure things
so that upgrades don't break your cluster, but I believe the ideas
outlined above could lead you there if you set up a test environment
and experiment a little bit with it.
Thanks.
-mu
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Curt Millshac...@fluke.com wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
This is certainly not a complete procedure on how to configure things
so that upgrades don't break your cluster, but I believe the ideas
outlined above could lead
Curt Mills wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
This is certainly not a complete procedure on how to configure things
so that upgrades don't break your cluster, but I believe the ideas
outlined above could lead you there if you set up a test environment
and experiment a
On 8/12/09, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Filipe
Brandenburgerfilbran...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 07:24, Lanny Marcuslmmailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
analytics.linksynergy.com uses an invalid security certificate.
The
REPLY-TO: 183c528b0908121238k33c407ah18e4762c48652...@mail.gmail.com
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:38:00 -0400
Brian Mathis brian.mat...@gmail.com
It also helps to understand how people read instructions. When
they look at a page, they see {big blob of useless introduction
text}, then they see
James B. Byrne wrote:
REPLY-TO: 183c528b0908121238k33c407ah18e4762c48652...@mail.gmail.com
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:38:00 -0400
Brian Mathis brian.mat...@gmail.com
It also helps to understand how people read instructions. When
they look at a page, they see {big blob of useless introduction
On 08/13/2009 01:11 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3775
(originally asked in the CentOS forums)
thanks,
the glibc package needs a bit more attention. Will attempt to get this
done tonight
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
Does anybody know how to restart X in centos 5.3? /etc/init.d/gdm | xdm
seems to be missing.
thanks,
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:59 -0700, grace rante wrote:
Does anybody know how to restart X in centos 5.3? /etc/init.d/gdm |
xdm seems to be missing.
Those scripts never existed. GDM runs from an entry in /etc/inittab,
not from an rc script. You should have these two lines
in /etc/inittab:
I found that /usr/sbin/gdm-restart will also do the trick.
thanks,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:59 -0700, grace rante wrote:
Does anybody know how to restart X in centos 5.3? /etc/init.d/gdm |
xdm seems to be missing.
Hi,
I managed to get my C4580 (4500 series) connected to my router to work
with 64 bit 5.3.
That printer needs at least hplip 2.8.10 which I found at
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/12086038/com/hplip-2.8.10-0.1.el5.test.x86_64.rpm.html
It was just a matter of following the manual
Hello Gavin,
We have a large number of locations around the world with a number of
servers in each. We use rsyslog to handle this, as we are able to use
encrypted connections back to the central servers.
Also each location has an aggregation host, so not all servers have to
connect back to the
Looks like the chum did not have to lose any data.
Wiping out the MBR and the next 63 blocks apparently only wiped out grub
stage1, partition table, and part of the lvm config data.
I get to try to do a lvm 'recovery' at his expense now but this is my
first time...has anybody ever tried
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Looks like the chum did not have to lose any data.
I cannot believe he actually tried to create a new filesystem on sda
according to the .bash_history file after the dd commands. I think I
need a titanium clueby4. Anybody know where I can get one?
Hi Forall,
I use this, and its pretty stable. :D
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/php/files/EL5/i386/
CMIW.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:39 PM, f...@llfor...@stalowka.info wrote:
Hi,
I was looking a stable repo when I find php-5.2.10 wich I can use on
my centos 5.3, previously I used a remi and
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 8/13/09, madunix madu...@gmail.com wrote:
Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
recommended or not?
need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
The NSA Guide to the Secure Configuration of RHEL 5 indicates this is
OK, but
Lars Hecking wrote:
Marcelo Roccasalva writes:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 13:11, Jerry Geisge...@pagestation.com wrote:
When I install some RPMS like openoffice 3 on centos x85_64
is there some command that will leave all the actual files alone (leave
them installed)
but just remove the RPM
Lars Hecking wrote:
Reason is I was wanting to do this so a next yum update does not get all
confused...
That should not be a problem. yum update will see that your installed
version (3.mumble) is greater than the version in the repository
(2.mumble) and will then skip updating openoffice.
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Looks like the chum did not have to lose any data.
I cannot believe he actually tried to create a new filesystem on sda
according to the .bash_history file after the dd commands. I think I
need a titanium clueby4.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:59 AM, madunixmadu...@gmail.com wrote:
Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
recommended or not?
need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
For a production server, I don't auto-update. There are too many
variables
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Looks like the chum did not have to lose any data.
I cannot believe he actually tried to create a new filesystem on sda
according to the .bash_history file after the dd commands.
63 matches
Mail list logo
