Interesting... I tried something similar using KOAN/Cobbler and believe
that is the error I saw as well...
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Charles J Gruener wrote:
Doing a kickstart install of Fedora 12 results in a non-bootable image.
From a virt-maanger instance, the error produced when trying to
I specifically call out to create an ext3 filesystem in the kickstart file for
/boot. I did neglect to mention that in my original post.
Charles
On Nov 23, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Andri Möll wrote:
This looks like your host doesn't support the filesystem your domU's
using. I think Fedora's on
I've only got the one virtual disk. /boot is on xvda1 with / and swap
in LVs. The PV is xvda2.
Charles
On Nov 23, 2009, at 4:43 PM, Andri Möll an...@dot.ee wrote:
If /boot is on another virtual drive, make sure it's the first one in
the VM's 'disk' listing (/etc/xen/foo). I remember
Found the cause of the problem. It seems virt-manager parses both its own
config files and those under /etc/xen. There were still the config files
for the old VMs in /etc/xen but after the virsh edit libvirt also create
new ones for the renamed VMs. This apparently confused virt-manager. After
Hola,
Que bueno escuchar que solucionaste eso de el cacha, talvez nos puedas
iluminar de donde sacaste la Info?
Gracias y buena suerte.
El 22 de noviembre de 2009 21:14, ces can arvega...@hotmail.com escribió:
Saludos:
Me de gusto decirles que mi idea funciono ahora ya no consumo mucho
El día 22 de noviembre de 2009 20:14, ces can arvega...@hotmail.com escribió:
Saludos:
Me de gusto decirles que mi idea funciono ahora ya no consumo mucho ancho de
banda con youtube
de un tiempo para ca videocache es de pago , en su momento estuvo
libre , pero ya no lo pude coger a tiempo ,
Gracias, por sus respuestas, les explico un poco lo que pretendo, quiero que
el servidor realice las siguientes funciones:
- Haga de servidor de impresora, ósea la impresora ira conectada a
este y el resto de pcs en la red, podrán imprimir conectándose a la este.
- Luego quiero que
Buenas,
Durante mucho tiempo he estado siguiendo la lista pero nunca habia posteado.
Asi que gracias a todos por los aportes que hacen. Me ha surgido un problema
con el acceso a las carpetas mediante ssh. Les expongo el problema, en una
red de un colegio que he empezado a administrar tengo un
El día 22 de noviembre de 2009 20:41, Andres Genovez
andresgeno...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola,
Que bueno escuchar que solucionaste eso de el cacha, talvez nos puedas
iluminar de donde sacaste la Info?
Gracias y buena suerte.
aqui lo tienes , el problema es que es de pago
El 19/11/09 20:08, Mauricio Cesar Ramirez Torres escribió:
Hola!
ya probé incluso cambiando de distribución (ubuntu, Debian y CentOS)
pero el resultado es el mismo y ese es mi problema, cuando enciendo el
servicio lo puedo ver y me alterna las peticiones a cada servidor web,
si apago un
Hola:
Bueno yo lo baje de los repositorios de FreeBSD que tambien manejo.
Siguen el manual de instalacion de la pagina de videocache y estara listo en
menos de 1 minuto.
Cesar Canales.
From: xserverli...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:59:16 -0600
To: centos-es@centos.org
El día 23 de noviembre de 2009 13:12, ces can arvega...@hotmail.com escribió:
Hola:
Bueno yo lo baje de los repositorios de FreeBSD que tambien manejo.
Siguen el manual de instalacion de la pagina de videocache y estara listo en
menos de 1 minuto.
ok gracias por la info , pero cual es la url
El 23 de noviembre de 2009 10:13, Ivan Boluda Puig
ivan.bol...@gmail.comescribió:
Buenas,
Durante mucho tiempo he estado siguiendo la lista pero nunca habia
posteado. Asi que gracias a todos por los aportes que hacen. Me ha surgido
un problema con el acceso a las carpetas mediante ssh. Les
Sorry. It seems that I didn't illustrate what I mean correctly . I mean that
it is appeared to me that my CentOS 5 server will support for NAT by default
(as I checked it on VirtualBox) but after Asterisk DECT installation it
does not . Can you please let me know which settings maybe influenced
Hi All!
I have a some problem:
On the my motherboard Intel DG45NB with Processor Box Intel Core 2 Duo
E6300 , i see in the dmesg(log file):
dmesg | grep CPU0
APIC error on CPU0: 00(60)
or the sometime:
dmesg | grep CPU1
APIC error on CPU1: 00(60)
How can I fix this problem??? This Bug is
Well, I think reality is that most of us have had very good experience
with yum-priorities. There is no thing as absolute security.
And I'm going to continue to use it, it certainly allows for a more fine-
grained control than protect-base.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at
Andrey Garkin wrote:
Hi All!
I have a some problem:
On the my motherboard Intel DG45NB with Processor Box Intel Core 2 Duo
E6300 , i see in the dmesg(log file):
dmesg | grep CPU0
APIC error on CPU0: 00(60)
or the sometime:
dmesg | grep CPU1
APIC error on CPU1: 00(60)
How can
Hello
I was just asked what the logo means and I had to admit that I really
had no idea, as it was chosen way before my time. Can someone please
enlighten me about the logo. I have tried google but nothing really
came up :)
Some pointers would be very helpful.
Cheers Didi
--
My www page:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Gordon McLellan gordonth...@gmail.com
wrote:
KERNEL==eth?, SYSFS{address}==00:21:e9:17:64:b5, NAME=eth1 #
Now, all three network cards get assigned as eth0! eth1 and eth2 are
no longer found.
Eugeneapolinary Ju wrote:
hi!
does anyone has a good howto, docs how to set up an smtp, pop3, imap server,
with webmail, and has anti virus solution, and even spam filtering? :D [plus
secure connection for the clients :D ]
wich softwares are the best for this? [e.g.: vsftpd is the most
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Gordon McLellan gordonth...@gmail.com wrote:
Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and
fingers crossed, they seem to work!
SUBSYSTEM==net, SYSFS{address}==00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8, NAME=eth0 #
pro/1000gt
SUBSYSTEM==net,
Gordon McLellan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Gordon McLellan gordonth...@gmail.com
wrote:
Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and
fingers crossed, they seem to work!
SUBSYSTEM==net, SYSFS{address}==00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8, NAME=eth0 #
pro/1000gt
Hi,
I am unable to get my LAN masqueraded using SNAT with CentOS 5.3 and iptables.
I have the following setup:
eth0: connects to internet with static public IP 1.2.3.1 (obscured
here for privacy)
eth1: connects to DMZ with static public IP 1.2.3.2 (obscured here for privacy)
eth2: connects to
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Peter Peltonen
peter.pelto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am unable to get my LAN masqueraded using SNAT with CentOS 5.3 and iptables.
I have the following setup:
eth0: connects to internet with static public IP 1.2.3.1 (obscured
here for privacy)
eth1:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Gordon McLellan gordonth...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Gordon McLellan gordonth...@gmail.com
wrote:
Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and
fingers crossed, they seem to work!
SUBSYSTEM==net,
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Giovanni Tirloni tirl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Peter Peltonen
peter.pelto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am unable to get my LAN masqueraded using SNAT with CentOS 5.3 and
iptables.
I have the following setup:
eth0: connects
Andrey Garkin wrote:
Hi All!
I have a some problem:
On the my motherboard Intel DG45NB with Processor Box Intel Core 2 Duo
E6300 , i see in the dmesg(log file):
dmesg | grep CPU0
APIC error on CPU0: 00(60)
or the sometime:
dmesg | grep CPU1
APIC error on CPU1: 00(60)
How can I
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann
riba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I was just asked what the logo means and I had to admit that I really
had no idea, as it was chosen way before my time. Can someone please
enlighten me about the logo. I have tried google but nothing really
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum? I
really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring?
TIA,
Suzie
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Postfix.. Check it out at http://www.postfix.org. Its very powerful and is
the future of mailing.
Rgds
Dhiraj
Charles de
Gaullehttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/c/charles_de_gaulle.html
- The better I get to know men, the more I find myself loving dogs.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 21:15,
Hi there --
The postfix e-mail server is one possibility.
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Susan Day
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 10:45 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server
Hi;
I
Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum?
I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring?
Postfix
--
Eero,
RHCE
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can
yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future
will bring?
SMTP only provides for relaying mail.a mail server typically needs
a MTA (message transfer agent, smtp such as
On 16-Nov-2009 ken wrote:
On 11/15/2009 06:32 PM Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 06:21:40PM -0500, ken wrote:
echo This is line ${BASH_LINENO[0]} $@
That's all I needed. Thanks.
You might also want to check out bash's built in `caller` command.
See sendmail, postfix, Exim, qmail, dovecot, cyrus, Zimbra all related
mail world.
regards,
Santiago N.
El lun, 23-11-2009 a las 08:55 -0800, John R Pierce escribió:
Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:45 -0500, Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can
yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future
will bring?
As others have already suggested, consider Postfix.
I'm putting in my $0.02(US) so I
All,
Thanks for all of the input!
Actually, I fixed the issue by using a single yum command:
yum -y reinstall centos-ds*
It seems that I was using my laptop to work on my server via putty and
something 'broke' which caused the original install to have issues. But,
the above command
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ron Loftin wrote:
As others have already suggested, consider Postfix.
I'm putting in my $0.02(US) so I can add my experience when I first had
a need for a decent MTA. I had used Sendmail in the past, but I didn't
want to fight with the arcane syntax of the config files,
thus Susan Day spake:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum?
I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring?
TIA,
Suzie
postfix rocks. :)
HTH,
Timo
___
CentOS mailing list
As others have already suggested, consider Postfix.
I'm putting in my $0.02(US) so I can add my experience when I first had
a need for a decent MTA. I had used Sendmail in the past, but I didn't
want to fight with the arcane syntax of the config files, and at that
time the add-on management
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:55 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can
yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future
will bring?
SMTP only provides for relaying mail.
Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ron Loftin wrote:
As others have already suggested, consider Postfix.
I'm putting in my $0.02(US) so I can add my experience when I first had
a need for a decent MTA. I had used Sendmail in the past, but I didn't
want to fight with the arcane
Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum?
I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring?
Postfix is probably a reasonable choice, but I'm curious as to how you
reached the decision that you don't want to use
I dont seem to have any problems ( use this machine as a cheap h/w
random number generator, so its always under load ~ 1 )
Same board, same model. Thanks for the information.
This looked and felt like an acpi induced problem. I discovered that acpid was
turned on for some
reason, so I
I know everyone else has said it but postfix is a great replacement
for sendmail.
Another tool I've found that I like is ssmtp. It's not a replacement
for sendmail/postfix by any stretch but if you want a simple down
dirty tool to send email from an internal server to your main email
server it's
The subject says it all. I've still got that irritating problem of selinux
complaining with smagent writing to its own logfile, and as I mentioned
here, weeks ago, I've done everything that sealert says, a number of
times, and it didn't fix it, and I've determined that it's clearly an
error
Hello all,
As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network
switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100
mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is there a way to force
it to try to use 1 GB/sec? System-config-network isn't
Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Hello all,
As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network
switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100
mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is there a way to force
it to try to use 1 GB/sec?
Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Hello all,
As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network
switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100
mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is there a way to force
it to try to use 1 GB/sec?
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:45 -0500, Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can
yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future
will bring?
TIA,
as root...
yum install postfix system-switch-mail
# edit
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:01 -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The subject says it all. I've still got that irritating problem of selinux
complaining with smagent writing to its own logfile, and as I mentioned
here, weeks ago, I've done everything that sealert says, a number of
times, and it
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
yum install postfix system-switch-mail
# edit /etc/postfix/main.conf
system-switch-mail # choose postfix, confirm
# done
Craig, I stopped qmail, which I had installed outside of yum, turning off
sendmail first, then
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:01 -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The subject says it all. I've still got that irritating problem of
selinux
complaining with smagent writing to its own logfile, and as I mentioned
here, weeks ago, I've done everything that sealert says, a number of
times, and it
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:41 -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:01 -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The subject says it all. I've still got that irritating problem of
selinux
complaining with smagent writing to its own logfile, and as I mentioned
here, weeks ago, I've
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 13:30 -0500, Susan Day wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com
wrote:
yum install postfix system-switch-mail
# edit /etc/postfix/main.conf
system-switch-mail # choose postfix, confirm
# done
Craig,
Hi,
Is there is anyway to Open Microsoft .mdb files in open office on
Centos 5.3 ?
Thanks
linux
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
No but you need to do this then...
chkconfig postfix on
chkconfig sendmail off
and if there is some mechanism for starting qmail on startup, you will
have to disable it...perhaps there is a sysv initscript that you
Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can
yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future
will bring?
See my slightly prior post on: Re: [CentOS]
smtp+pop3+imap+tls+webmail+anti spam+anti virus
It points you to:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Hello all,
As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network
switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100
mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is there a way to
Susan Day wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com
mailto:craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
No but you need to do this then...
chkconfig postfix on
chkconfig sendmail off
and if there is some mechanism for starting qmail on startup, you
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:55:38AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can
yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future
will bring?
SMTP only provides for relaying mail.a mail
2009/11/23 linux-crazy hichee...@gmail.com
Hi,
Is there is anyway to Open Microsoft .mdb files in open office on
Centos 5.3 ?
Thanks
linux
_
try mdbtools:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mdbtools/files/
--
Linux counter #213090
___
linux-crazy wrote:
Hi,
Is there is anyway to Open Microsoft .mdb files in open office on
Centos 5.3 ?
Short of running Access under wine or a virtual machine with windows, I
don't think so. Depending on your usage, it might be feasible to
convert the tables to a postgresql or mysql
Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network
switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100
mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is there a way to force
it to try to use 1 GB/sec?
ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
I'd expect that to mean that it was connected to a 100Mb switch port or
a managed switch configured to force 100Mb.
Managed switch, yes.
But then I tried this. Typing:
ethtool --change eth0 speed 1000 duplex full autoneg on
DID work! But I wonder
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Are you using cat 5e or cat 6 (gigabit certified) cable?
Yes.
***
Gilbert Sebenste
(My opinions only!)
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:59:40PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
It points you to:
http://howtoforge.net/virtual-users-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-squirrelmail-fedora-10
Now granted this is for FC10, but I suspect it would be easy to fit into
Centos.
Please, for the love of
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
I'd expect that to mean that it was connected to a 100Mb switch port or
a managed switch configured to force 100Mb.
Managed switch, yes.
D'oh! make that unmanaged switch, sorry.
fred smith wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:55:38AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can
yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future
will bring?
SMTP only provides for relaying mail.
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 13:25 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
fred smith wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:55:38AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can
yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what
Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Hello all,
As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network
switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100
mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is there a way to force
it to try to use 1 GB/sec?
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:59:40PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
It points you to:
http://howtoforge.net/virtual-users-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-squirrelmail-fedora-10
Now granted this is for FC10, but I suspect it would be easy to fit into
Centos.
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, nate wrote:
What kind of switch? many/most? NICs will often set the speed to 100
or 10Mbps if they can't auto negotiate the connection
Check the switch config to make sure that it's not trying to force
the connection to some lower speed.
I checked; it's not. All seems
On 23/11/09 17:50, Ben Mohilef wrote:
This looked and felt like an acpi induced problem. I discovered that acpid
was turned on for some
reason, so I turned off the acpid daemon and it has behaved well for the last
day. Are you booting
yours with acpi=off as well ??
nope, just the
- Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 23/11/09 17:50, Ben Mohilef wrote:
This looked and felt like an acpi induced problem. I discovered that
acpid was turned on for some
reason, so I turned off the acpid daemon and it has behaved well for
the last day. Are you booting
On 23/11/09 21:34, Tim Nelson wrote:
Is it possible you have an application that runs at odd times that is
compiled for the wrong arch? IIRC the C3 is i586 compatible (almost i686 but
missing something stupid like 'cmov' instruction). I've got a handful of C3
based systems in my personal
- Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 23/11/09 21:34, Tim Nelson wrote:
Is it possible you have an application that runs at odd times that
is compiled for the wrong arch? IIRC the C3 is i586 compatible (almost
i686 but missing something stupid like 'cmov' instruction). I've
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Philip Manuel p...@zomojo.com wrote:
Philip Manuel wrote:
We are running kernel 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 with exporting 3 aoe provided
ext4 directories. For a couple of weeks we had a small number of users
using the system with no issues, today we added 7 users and
That's a little confusing, does that mean all the clients need to change
as well as the server ? Has no-one else hit this issue? We are running
all our clients and servers on x86_64.
Thanks
Phil
Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Philip Manuel p...@zomojo.com wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum?
I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring?
Postfix is probably a reasonable choice, but I'm curious as to how you
reached the
Eero Volotinen wrote:
Susan Day wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com
mailto:craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
No but you need to do this then...
chkconfig postfix on
chkconfig sendmail off
and if there is some mechanism for starting
Susan Day wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com
mailto:craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
yum install postfix system-switch-mail
# edit /etc/postfix/main.conf
system-switch-mail # choose postfix, confirm
# done
Craig, I stopped qmail,
Les Mikesell wrote:
Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ron Loftin wrote:
As others have already suggested, consider Postfix.
I'm putting in my $0.02(US) so I can add my experience when I first had
a need for a decent MTA. I had used Sendmail in the past, but I didn't
Hello
I seem to be getting some messages via email and in var/log/messages as
well, i think its a hard drive gone bad but was wondering if anyone has
seen something similar to this or would have some ideas if its fixable
or not, here are the messages
This email was generated by the smartd
lostson wrote:
Hello
I seem to be getting some messages via email and in var/log/messages as
well, i think its a hard drive gone bad but was wondering if anyone has
seen something similar to this or would have some ideas if its fixable
or not, here are the messages
Run manufacturer
Christopher Chan wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum?
I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring?
Postfix is probably a reasonable choice, but I'm curious as to
Les Mikesell wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Susan Day wrote:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum?
I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will
bring?
Postfix is
Christopher Chan wrote:
By not-monolithic, I mean that now submission queuing, forwarding, and local
delivery are all different processes, each running with limited credentials
most
of the time. And milters also can run under different uids.
All that means naught if there is a
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 23, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On the contrary, having the ability to extend through external
software gives
you unlimited options. Note that postfix eventually got around to
copying this
feature. Also with mimedefang you
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
You probably really want ldap for that sort of thing.
You probably really want to reconsider using ldap for anything that
gets
loads of changes daily.
In the case of a mail
Ian Forde wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 23, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On the contrary, having the ability to extend through external
software gives
you unlimited options. Note that postfix eventually got around to
copying this
feature. Also
Ian Forde wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
mailto:christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
You probably really want ldap for that sort of thing.
You probably really want to reconsider using ldap for anything that
Les Mikesell wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
By not-monolithic, I mean that now submission queuing, forwarding, and
local
delivery are all different processes, each running with limited credentials
most
of the time. And milters also can run under different uids.
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:00 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
Ian Forde wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
mailto:christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
You probably really want ldap for that sort of thing.
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:00 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
Ian Forde wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
mailto:christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
You probably really
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ian pointed how he needs to 'replicate' a local copy of user 'accounts'
from Exchange so that he does not kill Exchange. I just pointed out that
this sort of thing can be done also for sites with a very large user
base that will want something that is more
Christopher Chan wrote:
How do you have a remote root exploit if you aren't running as root?
Ask the sendmail advisories for 8.12.x.
Wasn't the last bug found and fixed 5 or 6 years ago?
I fail to see how that becomes an advantage for sendmail.
It lets you control load
Les Mikesell wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
How do you have a remote root exploit if you aren't running as root?
Ask the sendmail advisories for 8.12.x.
Wasn't the last bug found and fixed 5 or 6 years ago?
Which is great. Just saying that if there is one
Christopher Chan wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:00 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
Ian Forde wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
mailto:christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
