I have a dom0 machine running CentOS 5.4 with all the latest updates
using Xen as my hypervisor. I am using Xen in part because this machine
was set up prior to KVM being included in RHEL, and in part because
KVM's network bridging configuration is not nearly as simple as Xen's.
The dom0
- Aaron Clark ophid...@ophidian.homeip.net wrote:
What steps should I take next to debug this?
Downgrade back to where you were bit by bit (or just guess that it's dom0's
kernel) and see when it starts working again.
What does the busted guest say when it tries to boot while you watch its
Estimados señores, ayer compramos un disco para un servidor ftp, la cosa es
que monte el disco y luego aprobeche de cambiar el home al nuevo disco, al
momento de reiniciar el disco /dev/hdd1 fallo que es en el cual esta el home
ahora.
El problema es que el servidor es un raid particionado en 3 y
Hola Juan pablo, gracias por tu respuesta, si, efectivamente es un .exe, el
programa fue desarrollado en clipper y el ejecutable es el que se visualiza
en todos clientes, todos los clientes ejecutan esta aplicacion desde el
escritorios en win xp.
No se como puedo hacer que ese ejecutable funcione
Hola no se si te sirva usar wine, que es un emulador de windows que
funciona en linux yo lo uso para emular algunos programas como dreanwever
y otros simplemente.
Lo uso de forma local no en red no se si haya forma de ejecutarlo por la red
yum -y install wine
César
Hola Juan pablo, gracias
Gracias pero wine no me sirve, porque la conexion sera en red, wine es para
ejecuatble spero con toda la paqueteria instalada en una maquina.
El 27 de marzo de 2010 17:18, César Martínez
cmarti...@servicomecuador.comescribió:
Hola no se si te sirva usar wine, que es un emulador de windows que
You could use ACL's, I use this ti give my normal user access to these logs,
saving me logging in as root.
On 26 March 2010 15:55, Carlos Santana neu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to give read-only access to mysql and apache-http server
log files to a non-root user. I can modify group
Benjamin Franz wrote:
Robert Heller wrote:
I suspect that this is a simular case to what I did: I have a server
with 4 drives. I have several (small) RAID1 partitions (/boot, /,
/usr, /var, etc.) with 4 mirrors and one large RAID5 with three
partitions and a hot spare (a LVM volumn group,
Robert Spangler wrote:
On Thursday 25 March 2010 18:10, Robert Heller wrote:
The prefered way to go would be RAID10 (RAID1 (mirror) + RAID0 (stripe)).
Form pairs as RAID1, then strip the pairs. With 8 disks, this would 4
pairs, 1.5TB/pair = 1.5*4 = 6TB total.
I am just
Why doesn't my internet-connection script work?
When I plug the ethcable out, it just waits...and waits...and waits...
The script: http://pastebin.com/AE9U1qdL
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi Jozsef,
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Jozsef Vadkan jozsi.avad...@gmail.com wrote:
Why doesn't my internet-connection script work?
I suggest you double-check the Advanced Bash Scripting Guide.
You posted this to a couple of sites.
In your if statements, you must do if `statement`; then
On 27 March 2010 12:07, Jozsef Vadkan jozsi.avad...@gmail.com wrote:
Why doesn't my internet-connection script work?
When I plug the ethcable out, it just waits...and waits...and waits...
The script: http://pastebin.com/AE9U1qdL
This is a ping script I use to check my boxes are all up an
On 27 March 2010 12:47, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 March 2010 12:07, Jozsef Vadkan jozsi.avad...@gmail.com wrote:
Why doesn't my internet-connection script work?
When I plug the ethcable out, it just waits...and waits...and waits...
The script:
Am 27.03.2010 13:48, schrieb James Bensley:
Would help if I actually put the link in maybe? Doh!
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=QRYHjDpQ
Why `ping -c $PCount $hosts | grep 64 bytes | wc | awk {'print $1'}'
when `ping -c $PCount $hosts | grep -c 64 bytes' is sufficient?
Alexander
On 27 March 2010 12:56, Alexander Dalloz
ad+li...@uni-x.orgad%2bli...@uni-x.org
wrote:
Am 27.03.2010 13:48, schrieb James Bensley:
Would help if I actually put the link in maybe? Doh!
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=QRYHjDpQ
Why `ping -c $PCount $hosts | grep 64 bytes | wc | awk {'print
On Mar 27, 2010, at 5:07 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Robert Spangler wrote:
On Thursday 25 March 2010 18:10, Robert Heller wrote:
The prefered way to go would be RAID10 (RAID1 (mirror) + RAID0
(stripe)).
Form pairs as RAID1, then strip the pairs. With 8 disks, this
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Benjamin Franz wrote:
Yup. 8 way RAID1 for the OS, 8 way RAID6 for the data. I was hoping when
I setup the 8-way RAID1 for the OS that I would get really good read
speeds since md is supposed to stripe reads from RAID1, but in practice
the RAID6
On Saturday 27 March 2010 05:07, John R Pierce wrote:
for all practical purposes its the same thing. if it was really
stripe then mirror, a naive mirror handler would think it would have to
remirror both drives when one half of one of the stripesets failed and
was replaced. but in
On Saturday 27 March 2010 09:22, Ross Walker wrote:
for all practical purposes its the same thing. if it was really
stripe then mirror, a naive mirror handler would think it would have
to
remirror both drives when one half of one of the stripesets failed and
was replaced.
Jozsef Vadkan wrote:
Why doesn't my internet-connection script work?
When I plug the ethcable out, it just waits...and waits...and waits...
The script: http://pastebin.com/AE9U1qdL
DNS lookups take a long time to time out and fail. You could try a ping to
your
default gateway's IP
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 15:54 +0100, Niki Kovacs wrote:
I'd like to handle the two PCs from the medical office remotely with
FreeNX. I figured that the best way to distinguish them would be to
assign a different port for SSH to each of them, and then redirect each
of the ports respectively.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:14:18AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
Robert Heller wrote:
I suspect that this is a simular case to what I did: I have a server
with 4 drives. I have several (small) RAID1 partitions (/boot, /,
/usr, /var, etc.) with 4 mirrors and one large RAID5 with three
Hi all,
Where i want to arrive:
1) having two storage server replicating partition with DRBD
2) exporting via GNBD from the primary server the drbd with GFS2
3) inporting the GNBD on some nodes and mount it with GFS2
Assuming no logical error are done in the last points logic this is the
G'day.
I am trying to get a very old Solaris 5.7 server to ftp data to my
updated CentOS 5.4 server but the Solaris box keeps losing
networking after sending some data. I can't ping the Solaris box
from any of the servers on my network.
Could this be related to a much newer (modern) TCP/IP
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Wade Hampton wadehampto...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day.
I am trying to get a very old Solaris 5.7 server to ftp data to my
updated CentOS 5.4 server but the Solaris box keeps losing
networking after sending some data. I can't ping the Solaris box
from any of the
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 13:02 -0400, Wade Hampton wrote:
I can't ping the Solaris box
from any of the servers on my network.
---
That in it self should tell you to look at the cabling and nic card. I
suspect its a very old nic card like ISA or begining PCI. Just because
it is Sol 5 does not
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Well, here's the tale: we got a replacement kit for some APC SmartUPS
3000 - rackmount UPSs. The kit, costing about half of what APC is
asking, is just the batteries, and you pull the tray out, open it up, and
swap out the batteries. Except, I did this on one... and the
Thanks for the feedback. On Linux I have tried setting:
rmem_default=32768
rmem_max=65536
tcp_window_scaling=0
tcp_sack=0
tcp_fack=0
I can send data to the Solaris x86 box all day with no problems.
It is only when it sends data to my Linux box that it crashes.
The NIC is
JohnS wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 13:02 -0400, Wade Hampton wrote:
I can't ping the Solaris box
from any of the servers on my network.
---
That in it self should tell you to look at the cabling and nic card. I
suspect its a very old nic card like ISA or begining PCI. Just
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:14:18AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
Yup. 8 way RAID1 for the OS, 8 way RAID6 for the data. I was hoping when
I setup the 8-way RAID1 for the OS that I would get really good read
speeds since md is supposed to stripe reads from RAID1, but
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:49 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
JohnS wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 13:02 -0400, Wade Hampton wrote:
I can't ping the Solaris box
from any of the servers on my network.
---
That in it self should tell you to look at the cabling and nic card. I
Firstly my gateway 217.20.xxx.1
My ip adress 188.72.xxx.189
Sub net 255.255.255.0 this settings works on fedora 12 perfect but on
centos ubuntu freebsd or fedora core it is not working but on all this
systems i am able to use nat, i have installed linux again and again
thousands of time the
2010/3/27 cahit Eyigünlü cahit.eyigu...@gmail.com:
Firstly my gateway 217.20.xxx.1
My ip adress 188.72.xxx.189
Sub net 255.255.255.0 this settings works on fedora 12 perfect but on
centos ubuntu freebsd or fedora core it is not working but on all this
systems i am able to use nat, i have
please check the attachments fedora is working with the properties given,
and nat is working also on cent os but bridged is not working i tryed Eero
what you write but still netstat -rn is same and i could not ping my
gateway
2010/3/27 Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
2010/3/27 cahit
Wade Hampton wrote:
Trying ndd /dev/elx \? results in couldn't push module 'elx'.
so no idea how to tune it. I can run ndd /dev/ip \? and I get
a list of tuneables
i'm pretty sure its /dev/elx0 or /dev/elx1 or whatever and not just /dev/elx
oldest sol box I still have warm is
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
Firstly my gateway 217.20.xxx.1
My ip adress 188.72.xxx.189
there's something you're not telling us here, as the gateway has to be
reachable via a network, and 217.20.xxx.1 is not part of either network
shown in your route or ifconfig output.
check fedora's txt i've send it is working perfect
my gateway : 217.20.117.1
my ip 188.72.255.289
subnet 255.255.255.0
fedora 12 is working when i set ip directly but any other linux dist is not
:( please i need help :(
2010/3/27 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
At Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:01:08 -0700 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:14:18AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
Yup. 8 way RAID1 for the OS, 8 way RAID6 for the data. I was hoping when
I setup the 8-way RAID1 for the OS that
2010/3/27 cahit Eyigünlü cahit.eyigu...@gmail.com:
check fedora's txt i've send it is working perfect
my gateway : 217.20.117.1
my ip 188.72.255.289
subnet 255.255.255.0
fedora 12 is working when i set ip directly but any other linux dist is not
:( please i need help :(
maybe you need to
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
check fedora's txt i've send it is working perfect
my gateway : 217.20.117.1
my ip 188.72.255.289
subnet 255.255.255.0
fedora 12 is working when i set ip directly but any other linux dist
is not :( please i need help :(
thats not a valid IPv4 network configuration.
did you get the attachment i am adding again , 188.72.255.189 already added
but there is sth. different with fedora which is working with bridged
connection esppecially gateway, beside this i could not ping my own gateway
there are 4 other windows machines and all of them working perfect
At Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:54:04 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
check fedora's txt i've send it is working perfect
my gateway : 217.20.117.1
my ip 188.72.255.289
subnet 255.255.255.0
fedora 12 is working when i set ip directly but any other linux dist is not
:(
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
did you get the attachment i am adding again , 188.72.255.189 already
added but there is sth. different with fedora which is working with
bridged connection esppecially gateway, beside this i could not ping
my own gateway there are 4 other windows machines and all of
This is fedora's route table :
r...@lin [~]# netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
217.20.117.10.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH0 0 0
eth0
78.159.97.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0
it was 188.72.255.189 i wrote wrong with 289 sorry
2010/3/27 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
did you get the attachment i am adding again , 188.72.255.189 already
added but there is sth. different with fedora which is working with
bridged connection esppecially
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
This is fedora's route table :
r...@lin [~]# netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window
irtt Iface
217.20.117.10.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH0 0
0 eth0
78.159.97.0 0.0.0.0
Fedora 12 designed automatically and i need same settings because centos is
in the same machine with fedora under vmware ...
the only one difference is fedora's ip address 78.159.97.xx and centos is
188.72.255.189 everything else same
2010/3/27 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
cahit Eyigünlü
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:01:08AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:14:18AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
Yup. 8 way RAID1 for the OS, 8 way RAID6 for the data. I was hoping when
I setup the 8-way RAID1 for the OS that I would get really
At Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:07:49 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
This is fedora's route table :
r...@lin [~]# netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
217.20.117.10.0.0.0
i tryed this :
[r...@lin2 ~]# route add default gw 217.20.117.1 dev eth0
the answer
siocaddrt : network is unreachable
2010/3/27 Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com
At Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:07:49 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
This is fedora's route table :
r...@lin
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:14:18AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
Robert Heller wrote:
I suspect that this is a simular case to what I did: I have a server
with 4 drives. I have several (small) RAID1 partitions (/boot, /,
/usr, /var, etc.) with 4 mirrors and one large
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
Fedora 12 designed automatically and i need same settings because
centos is in the same machine with fedora under vmware ...
the only one difference is fedora's ip address 78.159.97.xx and centos
is 188.72.255.189 everything else same
why so many different network
this is given by datacenter and 188.72.255.188 my webserver's static ip
2010/3/27 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
Fedora 12 designed automatically and i need same settings because
centos is in the same machine with fedora under vmware ...
the only one difference is
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
i tryed this :
[r...@lin2 ~]# route add default gw 217.20.117.1 dev eth0
the answer
siocaddrt : network is unreachable
Manual setup:
[r...@lin2 ~]# route add default gw 217.20.117.1 dev eth0
[r...@lin2 ~]# route add host 217.20.117.1 netmask
i am newbee :( could you please write in order the routes must added for me
ip 188.172.255.189
subnet 255.255.255.0
gateway 217.20.117.1
2010/3/27 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
i tryed this :
[r...@lin2 ~]# route add default gw 217.20.117.1 dev eth0
the answer
I can't get my HP DeskJet D2345 (USB) to work on my CentOS 5.3 machine.
It'll work on another machine (with Fedora 7).
I compared the installation details (in CUPS http://localhost:631) -
seems that Cent does not have the driver. On the F7 machine, the device
is D2345 (HP D2300 series) and the
i understand you the answer machine name could not resolved
27 Mart 2010 22:01 tarihinde cahit Eyigünlü cahit.eyigu...@gmail.comyazdı:
i am newbee :( could you please write in order the routes must added for me
ip 188.172.255.189
subnet 255.255.255.0
gateway 217.20.117.1
2010/3/27 John R
Try the ppd file here:
http://www.openprinting.org/printer/HP/HP-DeskJet_D2300
Cheers
Ubuntu 7.10, Linux 2.6.31-20-generic unknown 16:40:15 up 1 day, 2:29, 1
user, load average: 0.33, 0.20, 0.10
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 16:12 -0400, Michael Klinosky wrote:
I can't get my HP DeskJet D2345 (USB)
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
this is given by datacenter and 188.72.255.188 my webserver's static ip
That doesn't make sense. They should give you a gateway address that is within
the range of your own IP's netmask. If it works at all under any OS it must be
because the gateway router is
but how fedora works perfect also windows too
2010/3/27 Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
this is given by datacenter and 188.72.255.188 my webserver's static ip
That doesn't make sense. They should give you a gateway address that is
within
the range of your own
Thanks. I'll try it on Monday when I get back to the machine.
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 2:45 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Wade Hampton wrote:
Trying ndd /dev/elx \? results in couldn't push module 'elx'.
so no idea how to tune it. I can run ndd /dev/ip \? and I get
a list
it worked thankes every body i had a problem with activating
network card :D
[r...@lin2 ~]# route add default gw 217.20.117.1 dev eth0
[r...@lin2 ~]# route add host 217.20.117.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 dev eth0
that is solution
27 Mart 2010 22:50 tarihinde cahit Eyigünlü
B.J. McClure wrote:
Try the ppd file here:
http://www.openprinting.org/printer/HP/HP-DeskJet_D2300
Apparently, you can't download just a ppd file. :/ It seems like I'd
have to download the whole hplip package (basically upgrade).
The F7 box (where the printer works) has version 1.7.4
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Michael Klinosky m...@enter.net wrote:
B.J. McClure wrote:
Try the ppd file here:
http://www.openprinting.org/printer/HP/HP-DeskJet_D2300
Apparently, you can't download just a ppd file. :/ It seems like I'd
have to download the whole hplip package
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 19:45 -0400, Michael Klinosky wrote:
B.J. McClure wrote:
Try the ppd file here:
http://www.openprinting.org/printer/HP/HP-DeskJet_D2300
Apparently, you can't download just a ppd file. :/ It seems like I'd
have to download the whole hplip package (basically
MHR wrote:
Is there some special reason you don't update to 5.4 and see if that
helps? If it's just your home machine, that shouldn't be too much of
a stretch
I didn't really think about updating; 5.3 works OK. Well, that is,
unless 5.4 would fix this.
Or did you misstate your CentOS
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 20:50 -0400, Michael Klinosky wrote:
Craig wrote:
put any downloaded/custom ppd files in /usr/share/cups/model and then
you can choose them. They can be in tar.gz form if you want.
Well, if you can show me where to get a ppd file, I'd really appreciate
it! (I
On 03/28/2010 05:04 AM, Wade Hampton wrote:
me, I'd get on the console (most Sparc's newer than about 10 years old
have a ALOM or RSC or whatever remote console module you can telnet or
ssh to, older ones were almost all serial console, which is typically
connected to a cyclades type console
68 matches
Mail list logo
